@buchmanster @soulbound_human @Leo_Glisic @TrustlessState @tokenterminal Listened to that one 2 days ago!
I think my own view is that I'm ultimately a bit confused by money-mythologizing because the term "money" combines together SoV, MoE and UoA and the crypto space is moving toward those being very very separable.

@buchmanster@soulbound\u human@Leo\u Glisic@TrustlessState@tokenterminal两天前听过这个！
我认为我自己的观点是，我最终对货币神话化有点困惑，因为“货币”一词结合了SoV、MoE和UoA，加密空间正朝着非常非常可分离的方向发展。

@NathanpmYoung I wonder if @Ukraine would be interested!

@NathanpmYoung我想知道“乌克兰”是否会感兴趣！

@Leo_Glisic @TrustlessState @tokenterminal Basically this. The idea that "monetary premium" and "utility" are separable narratives has always been false. https://t.co/KXUzsr32Ia

@Leo\u Glisic@TrustlessState@tokenterminal基本上就是这样。认为“货币溢价”和“效用”是可分离的说法一直是错误的。https://t.co/KXUzsr32Ia

@NathanpmYoung Just need the delivering to be done by robots. I suspect if we built a city for it from scratch we could do it today. But even in existing cities, won't take long.

@NathanpmYoung只需要机器人来完成传送。我怀疑，如果我们从头开始为它建造一座城市，我们今天就能做到。但即使在现有的城市，也不会花太长时间。

@NathanpmYoung One of the best benefits of being wealthy is being able to go to restaurants 3x a day.
Another big benefit of being wealthy is not having to work at a restaurant.
Ergo, the only way universal wealth is mathematically possible is if the restaurants are run by robots.

@NathanPmeyoung富有的最大好处之一就是每天可以去3次餐厅。
富裕的另一大好处是不必在餐馆工作。
因此，从数学上讲，唯一可能实现普遍财富的方法就是让餐厅由机器人经营。

@NathanpmYoung Restaurants are actually a great example of why automation is so key to widely shared wealth.

@NathanPmeung餐厅实际上是一个很好的例子，说明了为什么自动化对广泛共享财富如此关键。

@tyler_m_john @littmath @lastpositivist And we all know people are too prone to discount far-future things.

@tyler\u m\u john@littmath@LastPositive，我们都知道人们太容易忽视遥远的未来。

@tyler_m_john @littmath @lastpositivist Also, "would you rather sleep through this uncomfortable phase in your life" is an insufficient test, because from the PoV of your personal experience, that just shifts the rest of your life leftward, so the moment you "lose" is at the end of your life.

@tyler\u m\u john@littmath@LastPositive同样，“你愿意在你生命中这个不舒服的阶段睡觉吗”是一个不充分的测试，因为从你个人经历的角度来看，这只会将你的余生向左转移，所以你“失去”的那一刻就是你生命的终点。

@tyler_m_john @littmath @lastpositivist I'm pretty sure I'd rather have a life of being stressed and a bit uncomfortable every day than not have a life at all!
Positive and negative emotions are relative categories, I think "negative emotion" = "worse than not existing" only rarely.

@tyler\u m\u john@littmath@LastPositivest我敢肯定，我宁愿过一种每天都有压力和有点不舒服的生活，也不愿过一种完全没有压力的生活！
积极情绪和消极情绪是相对的范畴，我认为“消极情绪”=“比不存在更糟糕”只是很少。

@AnthonyLeeZhang Most writing seems to be an adaptation to the incentives of the writer. Titles are clickbaity, news is sensational, corporate comms are bland and inoffensive, academic writing is defensive and dense both to minimize risk of blame for omission and maybe to tire out the reviewer.

@安东尼·李章（AnthonyLeeShang）的大多数作品似乎都是对作家动机的改编。标题是点击诱饵，新闻是耸人听闻的，公司通信是平淡和无害的，学术写作是防御性的和密集的，以尽量减少因遗漏而受到指责的风险，并可能使评论者疲劳。

@recmo @Noahpinion Where congestion is lower, marginal costs are low relative to fixed costs, so you'd be discouraging too many riders by trying to fully recoup costs.

@recmo@Noahpinion在拥堵较低的地方，边际成本相对于固定成本较低，因此，试图完全收回成本会让太多乘客感到沮丧。

@recmo @Noahpinion My instinct would be that profitability makes the most sense in areas where transit is highly congested (and even sometimes overcongested), so some kind of "auction" is inevitable, whether paid in dollars or in long lines or overcrowding inconvenience.

@recmo@Noahpinion我的直觉是，在交通高度拥挤（甚至有时过于拥挤）的地区，盈利能力是最有意义的，因此某种“拍卖”是不可避免的，无论是以美元支付，还是以长队支付，或是过于拥挤的不便。

RT: I wrote up a detailed explanation of the 7-block re-org that occurred last week on the beacon chain. It goes over the basics of the PoS Ethereum consensus and shows visually how the re-org happened, and why it is not inherent to the protocol https://barnabe.substack.com/p...

RT：我详细解释了上周在beacon链上发生的7块重组。它回顾了PoS以太坊共识的基本内容，直观地展示了重组是如何发生的，以及为什么重组不是协议固有的https://barnabe.substack.com/p...

@recmo @Noahpinion I think Noah's point is that we should be concave here
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
Free public transit and profitable public transit are both bad ideas, the optimal point is in the middle

@recmo@Noahpinion我想Noah的观点是我们应该在这里是凹的
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
免费公交和盈利公交都是坏主意，最佳点在中间

@jadler0 @sreeramkannan The goal is that recourse to user intervention may be required in extreme cases, but forcing that recourse necessarily loses the attacker a huge amount of eth

@jadler0@sreeramkannan目标是在极端情况下可能需要求助于用户干预，但强制求助必然会使攻击者损失大量eth

@jadler0 @sreeramkannan The idea in ethereum PoS is that things like majority censorship attacks get resolved with *user-activated* soft forks that choose the minority chain.

@jadler0@sreeramkannan以太坊PoS的想法是，像多数审查攻击这样的事情可以通过选择少数链的“用户激活”软叉来解决。

@tyler_m_john @littmath @lastpositivist Interesting... I would guess that most miscalculations go in the opposite direction!
eg. we typically think people who commit suicide are wrong about their feeling that they have nothing left to live for
What's the intuitive case for people overvaluing their future experiences?

@tyler\u m\u john@littmath@LastPositive有趣。。。我猜大多数的计算错误都是朝着相反的方向发展的！
我们通常认为自杀的人错误地认为他们已经没有生活的意义了
人们高估未来经历的直觉是什么？

RT: @VitalikButerin Let me try to nuance further. On the one hand, I don't think blockchains are necessary to "solve the double spend problem" and that there are many better approaches we will get to. On the other hand, the idea that the features that allow it to solve that problem are mostly

RT：@VitalikButerin让我试着进一步细化。一方面，我不认为区块链对于“解决双倍支出问题”是必要的，我们会找到很多更好的方法。另一方面，允许it解决该问题的功能主要是

RT: ⟠ Latest Week in Ethereum News!
🦄 @Uniswap $1 trillion cumulative trading volume
🤿 @jon_charb Ethereum roadmap deep dive
🕹️ @GameStop L1 & @loopringorg L2 wallet
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
Thanks to https://speedrunethereum.com/ for making this issue possible 🙏

转发：⟠ 以太坊新闻最新一周！
🦄 @Uniswap累计交易额1万亿美元
🤿 @jon\u charb以太坊路线图深入研究
🕹️ @游戏停止L1（&S）@loopringorg L2钱包
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
幸亏https://speedrunethereum.com/使此问题成为可能🙏

@koeppelmann @jaemin_eth @gakonst @gnosischain > how close/ different would be such a design from tendermint in your estimation?
Two key differences from TM:
1. We'll have to have *some* way to recover from >1/3 offline
2. We need to support 100k+ validators, so lots of work on really good BLS aggregation

@koeppelmann@jaemin\u eth@gakonst@gnosischain>；据您估计，这样的设计与tendermint有多接近/不同？
与TM的两个关键区别：
1、我们必须有*某种*方法来恢复>；1/3离线
2、我们需要支持超过10万个验证器，因此需要在非常好的BLS聚合方面做大量工作