@mpawlo @pourteaux @Noahpinion @balajis @JPBarlow It won't remove the power structure. It is creating a new structure that (sometimes awkwardly) works in parallel.
(I wrote about this in long form!) https://t.co/BU64u0aDov
@mpawlo@pourteaux@Noahpinion@balajis@JPBarlow它不会移除权力结构。它正在创建一个并行工作的新结构（有时很尴尬）。
（我写的很长！）https://t.co/BU64u0aDov
@espressoinsight @optimismPBC Interesting!
I know about @OptiPunk but what are the other examples of this?
@espressoinsight@optimismPBC有趣！
我知道@OptiPunk，但这方面的其他例子是什么？
@Noahpinion @mpawlo @balajis @JPBarlow Yep I worry about this too!
Though a bit less than I did 103 days ago. I think a particular event since then has shown us that when a critical time comes, there will inevitably be a lot of dumb twitter noise, but action is still possible.
@Noahpinion@mpawlo@balajis@JPBarlow是的，我也很担心！
虽然比103天前少了一点。我认为，从那以后发生的一件特殊事件向我们表明，当关键时刻到来时，不可避免地会有很多愚蠢的推特噪音，但行动仍然是可能的。
@Noahpinion @mpawlo @balajis @JPBarlow This is of course part of the messiness.
(It would not be messy if that model covered the entire world, but it doesn't, and connections to the outside are indispensable, so...)
@Noahpinion@mpawlo@balajis@JPBarlow这当然是混乱的一部分。
（如果这个模型覆盖了整个世界，那就不会很混乱，但事实并非如此，与外界的联系是必不可少的，所以……）
@Noahpinion @mpawlo @balajis @JPBarlow Ever since that dark metaphorical day when the number of humans increased from 2 to 3, cleanness became mathematically impossible.
https://vitalik.ca/general/202... https://t.co/1uGMbcYdKu
@自从人类从2人增加到3人的那一天起，清洁在数学上就变得不可能了。
https://vitalik.ca/general/202... https://t.co/1uGMbcYdKu
@mpawlo @Noahpinion @balajis @JPBarlow Nation states won't respect the internet's sovereignty any more than the internet respects that of nation states.
I don't expect either of their fundamentally different logics to decisively win out over the other one.
@mpawlo@Noahpinion@balajis@JPBarlow民族国家不会尊重互联网的主权，就像互联网尊重民族国家的主权一样。
我不期望他们两个根本不同的逻辑中的任何一个能够决定性地战胜另一个。
@mpawlo @Noahpinion @balajis @JPBarlow I think the difference between 25y ago and today is that 25y ago (and myself 10y ago) there was a dream of a clean future along those lines, but today it's clear that the only possibility is a messy future, and our positive visions have to accept the messiness.
@mpawlo@Noahpinion@balajis@JPBarlow我认为25年前和今天的区别在于25年前（和我10年前）有一个清洁未来的梦想，但今天很明显，唯一的可能性是一个混乱的未来，我们的积极愿景必须接受混乱。
@Noahpinion I think @balajis is right on this one; the only logical successor state to the USA is the internet.
@Noahpinion我认为@balajis在这一点上是正确的；美国唯一合乎逻辑的继承国是互联网。
@tobinjstone Someone should make a spinoff of The Purge where instead of doing something illegal that's harmful, the heroes use the 12 hour period to transport and install an apartment building into a single family zoned area, and have to defend it until the Purge ends.
@有人应该在这场清洗中分拆出来，英雄们用12个小时的时间将一栋公寓楼运输并安装到一个单独的家庭分区内，而不是做一些非法的有害的事情，并在清洗结束前对其进行保护。
RT: Latest Week in Ethereum News
🐼 @TimBeiko Ropsten testnet to Merge
📧@skiffprivacy e2e encrypted email using Eth wallet & @ensdomains
☠️ @dannyryan liquid staking derivatives dangerous at 25%
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
Thanks to @StarbloomVent🌌 for making this issue possible🙏
RT：最近一周以太坊新闻
🐼 @TimBeiko Ropsten测试网合并
📧@skiffprivacy e2e使用Eth钱包加密电子邮件@ensdomains公司
☠️ @dannyryan液体押注衍生品风险为25%
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
感谢@StarbloomVent🌌 使此问题成为可能🙏
@Noahpinion ie. there's always an interplay between whatever biases its writers and owners naturally have and a "desire to be perceived as centrist"
@Noahpinion，即，无论作家和所有者天生有什么偏见，都与“渴望被视为中间派”之间存在着相互作用
@Noahpinion One of my conclusions from reading The Gray Lady Winked (I do recommend it!) is that a big part of the NYT's failures comes from its often hamfisted attempts to overcorrect for its perceived biases.
@Noahpinion阅读《灰女人眨眼》得出的一个结论（我推荐！）《纽约时报》的失败很大一部分是因为它经常笨拙地试图纠正自己所感知的偏见。
What do you disagree with me the most on?
(followees can reply, anyone else can quote tweet, I'll read both)
你最不同意我的意见是什么？
（followees可以回复，其他任何人都可以引用tweet，我会同时阅读）
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas And without distributed column reconstruction, you would need centralized column reconstruction, which requires someone to get all the rows.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas，如果没有分布式列重建，则需要集中的列重建，这需要有人获取所有行。
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas Because with KZG you can reconstruct not only a row, but also a column (including proofs), because proofs are linear in the polynomial.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas，因为使用KZG不仅可以重建行，还可以重建列（包括证明），因为证明在多项式中是线性的。
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas The biggest weakness of Verkle+SNARK, aside from complexity, is that it's not friendly to distributed builders and distributed self-healing in the way that KZG uniquely is.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas除了复杂性之外，Verkle+SNARK最大的缺点是它对分布式构建器和分布式自愈不友好，不像KZG那样独特。
@gakonst @dankrad @musalbas Actually now that I think about it, no!
We have thought about Merkle+STARK as the post-quantum backup but not Verkle+SNARK.
@gakonst@dankrad@musalbas实际上现在我想起来了，不！
我们认为Merkle+STARK是量子后的后备，但不是Verkle+SNARK。
RT: The latest What's New in Eth2 is out!
Reorgs, Ropsten, research, regular recordings - and lots of other stuff that doesn't alliterate, all in the usual place: https://eth2.news/
#Ethereum
RT：最新的Eth2新增功能发布了！
Reorgs、Ropsten、研究、定期录音，以及许多其他不识字的东西，都在通常的地方：https://eth2.news/
#以太坊
Of course, in the absence of perfect compensation of externalities (ie. the status quo today), we still have moral responsibilities.
当然，在缺乏对外部性的完美补偿（即今天的现状）的情况下，我们仍然有道德责任。