以太坊 的最新消息

@robertwiblin I had this with Chinese for a long time. I knew how to say "socialism" and "proof of stake" long before "spoon". I still don't know how to say "mattress".

@robertwiblin我和中国人有过很长时间的接触。早在“勺子”之前,我就知道如何说“社会主义”和“利害关系证明”。我还是不知道怎么说“床垫”。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@jurbo_eth Actually my slave name doesn't have the "k". It's annoying and I would change it but the process is actually quite complicated.

@jurbo\u eth实际上我的奴隶名字没有“k”。这很烦人,我会改变它,但过程实际上相当复杂。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: I wrote a thing defending cryptocurrency, but I may delete it later on. https://blog.cryptographyengin...

RT:我写了一篇为加密货币辩护的文章,但我以后可能会删除它。https://blog.cryptographyengin...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@in_saigon Wait I thought I was losing the plot because I'm pro-WEF (I'm not actually but that's what the meme is).
But this feels like an anti-WEF-aligned opinion.
Which plot am I losing?

@在西贡大学等等,我以为我失去了剧情,因为我是世界经济论坛的支持者(实际上我不是,但这就是迷因)。
但这似乎是一种反世界经济论坛的观点。
我失去了哪个情节?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Please stop using "real name" to refer to your passport name. Your government doesn't get to define who you "really" are. If you use a different name in most day-to-day interactions, that is your real name.
"Passport name", "legal name", "slave name" to be edgy are all fine.

请不要用“真名”来指代您的护照名。你的政府无法定义你“真正”是谁。如果你在大多数日常互动中使用不同的名字,那就是你的真名。
“护照名”、“法定名”、“奴隶名”都可以。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@SpencrGreenberg We should be more worried than we are today that "ok boomer" is ageist and is making boomers feel unwelcome.

@SpencrGreenberg我们应该比现在更担心的是,“正常婴儿潮一代”是年龄歧视,让婴儿潮一代感到不受欢迎。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@kevinsekniqi @Corpetty @el33th4xor @CollinCusce Because the level of economic security is much higher when attackers can lose not just potential gains but also their principal.

@kevinsekniqi@Corpetty@el33th4xor@Collincuse,因为当攻击者不仅可能失去潜在收益,还可能失去本金时,经济安全水平要高得多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@accretionist @Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife I do think that it was true in 2014 that "the more moderate libertarians criticize corporations too, the more aggressive ones focus entirely on gov", but in 2022 as far as I can tell that's not true anymore.

@吸积主义者@Suitpossum@第三方生活我确实认为,2014年“更温和的自由主义者也批评公司,更激进的人完全专注于政府”,但在2022年,据我所知,这不再是事实。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@accretionist @Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife I don't even just mean the level-headed Canadian libertarians. I mean.... Bitcoiners. Including the aggressive and not very sane ones. Lots of anti-corporate sentiment, especially when we're talking about the banking system.

@我指的不仅仅是头脑冷静的加拿大自由主义者。我是说。。。。比特币制造者。包括那些好斗和不太理智的人。很多反公司情绪,尤其是当我们谈论银行系统时。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@accretionist @Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife That's what I mean! The libertarians I listen to attack corps all the time. Occasionally they even have to hear *from the outside* the point that sometimes bad stuff the banks do is actually a result of them having to comply with government regulations.

@增值主义者@Suitpossum@第三方生活这就是我的意思!自由主义者我一直在听攻击团的话。有时,他们甚至不得不从外部听到这样一个观点,即有时银行所做的坏事实际上是他们不得不遵守政府法规的结果。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife Ok I think the libertarians you listen to are different from the libertarians I listen to.

@Suitpossum@3rdPartyLife好吧,我想你听的自由主义者和我听的自由主义者是不同的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Suitpossum @3rdPartyLife How is the concern in any way selective? I've heard of lots of criticism of the existing commercial banking system on privacy issues.

@Suitepossum@3rdPartyLife这种关注在任何方面都是有选择性的?我听说很多人批评现有的商业银行系统的隐私问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@dirac_sol But then you're minting coins without corresponding liabilities, and eventually your stablecoin turns into terra.

@dirac\u sol,但是你在铸造没有相应责任的硬币,最终你的马厩变成了terra。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@gatnash Do you happen to know of a good introduction to islamic economics?

@盖特纳什你知道一个很好的伊斯兰经济学入门吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@NathanpmYoung Opinions on ethical values.
"Valuing the welfare of citizens of your own country 100x higher than people on the other side of the world is wrong and bad" doesn't really come with predictions.

@NathanPmeung对道德价值观的看法。
“把自己国家的公民的福利比世界另一边的人高出100倍,这是错误的,也是不好的”并不是真的有这样的预测。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux People do have a natural reason to invest at least some locally: if you're _just_ a renter, then you're negatively exposed to your city's economic well-being (through rent prices, and proxies to other people's rent eg. prices in restaurants), so you want to compensate for that

@pourteaux人有一个自然的理由至少在当地投资一些东西:如果你只是一个租客,那么你会对你所在城市的经济状况产生负面影响(通过租金价格和其他人的租金代理,例如餐馆的价格),所以你想对此进行补偿

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux This is a big part of why I support some kind of city coin (or for now just get a city-specific REIT)
You get wealth building, economic alignment with the place you live, but low hassle and more flexibility.

@pourteaux这是我为什么支持某种城市货币的一个重要原因(或者现在只需要获得一个特定于城市的REIT)
你可以积累财富,经济上与你居住的地方保持一致,但麻烦少,灵活性强。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: L1s do not assume majority correctness.
a full node rejects invalid state transitions signed by the majority
why won’t this cursed meme die https://twitter.com/kevinsekni...

转发:L1不假定多数正确性。
完整节点拒绝由多数签名的无效状态转换
为什么这个被诅咒的模因不会死https://twitter.com/kevinsekni...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: Summary of the Ropsten testnet merge: 🧵 https://t.co/xHBManCuru

RT:Ropsten testnet合并摘要:🧵 https://t.co/xHBManCuru

发表时间:4年前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum详情

@tszzl I do think that the morale effect of realizing that Elon could take over twitter if he wanted to still carries over somewhat even if it never happens. In which case I guess this prediction may turn out very correct, because the other effects equal zero 🤣
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

The largest consequence of Elon taking over Twitter may well be not any specific policy decision he makes, but rather the morale effect of his supporters feeling emboldened and his detractors feeling like they are arguing on enemy territory. This is happening already.

发表时间:4年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@Tzzle我确实认为,如果埃隆想继续接管推特,即使这种情况从未发生,他也可以接管推特,这会对士气产生一定的影响。在这种情况下,我想这个预测可能会非常正确,因为其他效应等于零🤣
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

埃隆接管推特的最大后果很可能不是他做出的任何具体政策决定,而是他的支持者感到胆大包天,而他的诽谤者感到他们在敌方领土上争论,从而产生了士气效应。这已经发生了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情