By terminal goals I *roughly* mean things like convenience, safety, fun, enjoyment, status, love, health...
Terminal goals aren't "individual" or "collective", they just are. What *is* individual or collective are the strategies for achieving these ends.
我所说的终极目标大致是指便利、安全、乐趣、享受、地位、爱情、健康。。。
最终目标不是“个人”或“集体”，而是。什么是个人或集体是实现这些目标的战略。
I've been thinking about *why* this is true, and I might have an explanation. Basically, I think it comes down to a confusion between terminal goals ("the things we ultimately want") and our strategies for achieving them... https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
Rhetorical tip: you can often frame either side of a debate as being individualist or collectivist.
Example:
"Instead of worrying so much about our individual safety, we should focus more on our collective need to have a rich and enjoyable shared life that's worth living for"
我一直在想为什么这是真的，我可能有一个解释。基本上，我认为这归结为最终目标（“我们最终想要的东西”）和我们实现它们的战略之间的混淆。。。https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
修辞技巧：你经常可以把辩论的任何一方定义为个人主义者或集体主义者。
例子：
“与其如此担心我们的个人安全，我们应该更多地关注我们的集体需要，拥有一个丰富而愉快的共享生活，值得为之生活”
RT: Freedom has long faced the threat of tyranny.
But realism saved the day.
Science & technology offer a new solution.
But social technology leads the way.
Watch the excellent #InnoMinds E6 with @Ethereum co-founder @VitalikButerin on @TaiwanPlusNews.🔽
https://www.taiwanplus.com/ori...
RT：自由长期面临着暴政的威胁。
但现实主义挽救了这一天。
科学与；技术提供了一种新的解决方案。
但社会技术领先。
在TaiwanPlusNews上观看与@Ethereum联合创始人@VitalikButerin合作的出色的#InnoMinds E6。🔽
https://www.taiwanplus.com/ori...
Rhetorical tip: you can often frame either side of a debate as being individualist or collectivist.
Example:
"Instead of worrying so much about our individual safety, we should focus more on our collective need to have a rich and enjoyable shared life that's worth living for"
修辞技巧：你经常可以把辩论的任何一方定义为个人主义者或集体主义者。
例子：
“与其如此担心我们的个人安全，我们应该更多地关注我们的集体需要，拥有一个丰富而愉快的共享生活，值得为之生活”
@robbensinger @MichaelTrazzi Probably correct to have me leaning a little more "bad" than "good"
@robbensinger@MichaelTrazzi让我倾向于“坏”而不是“好”可能是正确的
@robbensinger @MichaelTrazzi I like how two people's impressions of me ended up on opposite sides of the square!
(In reality I think I'm in the middle of the soon vs not-soon distribution; my probability distribution on "when it will happen" is quite wide)
@robbensinger@MichaelTrazzi我喜欢两个人对我的印象是如何在广场的对面结束的！
（事实上，我认为我处于“很快”与“不会很快”的分布中间；我关于“何时会发生”的概率分布相当广泛）
@Noahpinion Yeah, the average user has to be paying fees on net.
@是的，普通用户必须在网上付费。
@Noahpinion Think of it as similar to a $X signup bonus, with an added bonus to the project of giving them a widely dispersed ownership distribution. That's the best way to frame the case for it imo.
@Noahpinion将其视为类似于X美元的注册奖金，为项目增加了一个额外的奖金，即给予他们广泛分散的所有权分布。在国际海事组织（imo）看来，这是为it构建案例的最佳方式。
RT: 🧊 Gray Glacier Upgrade Announcement 🧊
At block 15,050,000, the Ethereum network will undergo the Gray Glacier fork to push back the difficulty bomb, *hopefully* for the last time ever 😁
If you run a node or validator, make sure to upgrade 🔜!
https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...
转发：🧊 Gray Glacier升级公告🧊
在15050000街区，以太坊网络将经历灰色冰川分叉，以击退难度炸弹，*希望*这是有史以来最后一次😁
如果运行节点或验证器，请确保升级🔜!
https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...
@cryptonickstro @WatcherGuru lol gold and silver are soooo last millennium
@cryptonickstro@WatcherGuru lol黄金和白银在上千年是如此之多
@zengjiajun_eth How would that work? The smart contract verifies answers to security questions by checking the hash?
(I actually do have ideas for how to do something like that much more safely than how most people conceive of security q's, but I think relying on friends might still be better)
@zengjiajun\u eth这是怎么回事？智能合约通过检查哈希来验证安全问题的答案？
（事实上，我确实有一些想法，知道如何做这样的事情比大多数人想象的安全q更安全，但我认为依赖朋友可能更好）
@PsychpunkNFTs @zengjiajun_eth No it's not lol, go back to 2021.
@PsychpunkNFTs@zengjiajun\u eth不，这不是lol，回到2021。
@zengjiajun_eth One other important thing in social recovery is making sure your friends ask security questions before signing off on anything. This doesn't need to be complicated and hard, actually security questions can be a fun game to re-live old memories. https://t.co/7hm7FdBIZs
@曾家俊eth社会恢复中的另一件重要事情是确保你的朋友在签署任何东西之前问安全问题。这并不需要复杂和困难，事实上，安全问题可以是一个有趣的游戏，重新活出旧的记忆。https://t.co/7hm7FdBIZs
@adrupsytov @zengjiajun_eth It's possible to set up a social recovery system in such a way that you're friends don't know what they're recovering until/unless you have to actually call on them to recover.
@adrupsytov@zengjiajun\u eth建立一个社会康复系统是有可能的，这样你的朋友就不知道他们在恢复什么，直到/除非你真的要求他们恢复。
Ever wondered how specifically ZK-SNARKs are used to preserve privacy, including some of the non-obvious tricks like how to prevent double-spending, and what the limits of ZK-SNARKs are?
This post tries to explain some of these ideas:
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
有没有想过ZK SNARK是如何专门用来保护隐私的，包括一些不明显的技巧，如如何防止双重消费，以及ZK SNARK的限制是什么？
这篇文章试图解释其中的一些想法：
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
RT: We've got a special announcement... 🥳
#ETHNewYork is already set to be our largest in-person event, but we found a little more space!
If you're on the waitlist, check your emails—but if you haven't applied, Friday is your last chance!
👇
https://nyc.ethglobal.com/
RT：我们有一个特别通知。。。🥳
#EthinewyWork已经成为我们最大的个人活动，但我们发现了更多的空间！
如果你在等待名单上，检查你的电子邮件，但如果你还没有申请，星期五是你最后的机会！
👇
https://nyc.ethglobal.com/
@Bananaplanet2 @cronokirby ok I literally can't tell if you are making a math pun
@Bananaplanet2@cronokirby好吧我真的不知道你是不是在说数学双关语
@joshgans @glenweyl I definitely think there are ways of achieving these goals that break things and ways that don't break things. Pairwise-matching feels on the safe side; if you try to lie to look uncorrelated and win big on one matching opportunity, you're missing out on lots of other matches.
@joshgans@glenweyl我绝对认为有办法实现这些目标，打破现状，也有办法不打破现状。成对匹配的感觉更安全；如果你试图撒谎，让自己看起来不相关，并在一场比赛中大获全胜，那么你就错过了很多其他比赛。
@joshgans @glenweyl > don’t we want truthful voting of preferences?
We definitely do, though cooperative game theory tells us that once you move away from (unrealistic) individual-choice assumptions achieving the optimum is often impossible, so we have to be more humble in what the goals are.
@joshgans@glenweyl>；难道我们不想要真实的偏好投票吗？
我们当然会这样做，尽管合作博弈论告诉我们，一旦你摆脱了（不切实际的）个人选择假设，实现最优往往是不可能的，所以我们必须对目标更加谦虚。