@cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github Your prove my point. I would have bothered to glance at the video had you said "It's a point by point rebuttal of Craig's argument". Instead you went ad hominem. When I tell you to stick to the point for credibility you retort "You seem determined to join the Craig/BSV cult."
@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github你证明了我的观点。如果你说“这是对克雷格论点的逐点反驳”，我会不厌其烦地看一眼视频。相反，你去了一家。当我告诉你为了信誉坚持到底时，你反驳说“你似乎下定决心要加入Craig/BSV崇拜。”
@cyberat2600 For the record, ad hominem attacks detract from your credulity, not @Dr_CSWright's If you want to discredit him, step through the BSV @github posted code and show where it is NOT turing complete after he has stated that t is. Don't post videos about his college grades. Childish!
@cyberat2600作为记录，ad-homeem攻击会降低你的轻信度，而不是@Dr_CSWright的。如果你想诋毁他，请仔细查看BSV@github发布的代码，并在他声明t是完整的后，显示它不完整的地方。不要发布关于他大学成绩的视频。幼稚！
@TeamSatoshi Inquiry du jour: "Does #Bitcoin + (requisite) add-ins >scale, >perform, >secure relative to #Ethereum et. al./progeny?
The obvious comparisons are #BSV vs #Ethereum.
Problem: Many considered knowledgeable/authoritative/intelligent in this space are mired in popularity contests
@TeamSatoshi Inquiry du jour:#比特币+（必备）插件相对于#以太坊等公司/子公司是否具有规模、性能和安全性？
比较明显的是#BSV和#以太坊。
问题：在这个领域，许多被认为有知识、有权威、有智慧的人深陷人气竞赛的泥潭
@WolfgangLohmann Your contribution was most welcome, quite informative. There's no need to apologize. My micro-soliloquy was not directed at you. There are some in the crypto-Twitter community who struggle to separate their likes/dislikes from critical analysis & discussion should be empirical
@WolfgangLohmann您的贡献非常受欢迎，内容丰富。没必要道歉。我的微独白不是针对你的。在加密Twitter社区中，有些人很难将自己的好恶与批判性分析区分开来；讨论应该是经验性的
@RaoulGMI I have identified three individuals in crypto, that combined, and potentially (1 case) even individually, may control the considerable majority of the industry.
If you haven't interviewed them, you haven't even come close to bringing your viewers the who's who in crypto & beyond!
@拉乌尔格米一世已经确定了三名加密技术人员，他们加在一起，甚至可能（1例）单独控制该行业的大部分。
如果你还没有采访过他们，你甚至还没有接近于让你的观众了解加密技术中的名人录；超过
RT: Certainly the US and Japan patents and the associated regulatory "attention" warrants @ReggieMiddleton interview. Once you've heard his story then move on to @jeremykauffman and @bgarlinghouse. You may observe a trend. https://twitter.com/RaoulGMI/s...
RT：当然，美国和日本的专利以及相关的监管“关注”值得@ReggieMiddleton采访。一旦你听了他的故事，就转到@jeremykauffman和@bgarlinghouse。你可以观察到一种趋势。https://twitter.com/RaoulGMI/s...
RT: @RaoulGMI How can that be true @Raoul if you haven’t interviewed the founder of defi, @ReggieMiddleton? No shade, just saying. Holder of a @Veri important IP in the crypto space. I think in order for your claim to be true and hold weight you must at least interview @ReggieMiddleton.
转发：@RaoulGMI@Raoul如果你还没有采访defi的创始人@reggiemidleton，那怎么可能是真的？没有阴影，只是说说而已。拥有加密空间中的@Veri重要IP。我认为，为了让你的说法真实可信，你至少必须采访@ReggieMiddleton。
Hmm..... https://twitter.com/RaoulGMI/s...
Every Friday I interview the biggest names and most important thinkers in the digital asset space on Raoul's Adventures in Crypto. Unique guests and in-depth conversations that get us all up the learning curve.
In a space that is moving this fast, let me act as your guide 1/
隐马尔可夫模型。。。https://twitter.com/RaoulGMI/s...
每周五，我都会就拉乌尔的加密奇遇采访数字资产领域的知名人士和最重要的思想家。独特的客人和深入的对话，让我们都有机会学习。
在一个发展如此之快的空间里，让我来做你的向导/
@JPinnacle2 @Joanna_MaGrath FOIA is not available for private entities, only federal government agencies. AT least, as far as I know.
@JPinnacle2@Joanna_MaGrath FOIA不适用于私人实体，仅适用于联邦政府机构。至少，据我所知。
Looking for critical comments on the following, whether pro or con. If you're not aware that a critical comment can be in favor of the matter commented on, then this request is likely not directed towards you.
All who understand what I'm requesting and are qualified, weigh in. https://twitter.com/WolfgangLo...
@ReggieMiddleton a) A Proof of Turing Completeness in Bitcoin Script. In: Bi Y., Bhatia R., Kapoor S. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1037. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
b) a practical prove,
1/
寻找以下方面的评论，无论是赞成还是反对。如果你不知道批评性评论可能有利于被评论的事情，那么这个请求可能不是针对你的。
所有理解我的要求并且有资格的人都加入进来。https://twitter.com/WolfgangLo...
@ReggieMiddleton a）比特币脚本中图灵完整性的证明。摘自：Bi Y.，Bhatia R.，Kapoor S.（eds）智能系统与应用。IntelliSys 2019。《智能系统与计算的进展》，第1037卷。查姆，斯普林格。https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
b） 一个实际的证明，
1/
This the Genesis episode of the VeriDAO @dao_veri YouTube channel. https://youtu.be/ArVg4CuSI14
这是VeriDAO@dao_veri YouTube频道的《创世纪》一集。https://youtu.be/ArVg4CuSI14
@TheDanDraper1 Trust me, we've been following.
This is all very good for us!
@相信我，我们一直在跟踪。
这对我们都很好！
@Frassle Opine!? https://medium.com/coinmonks/t...
@frassle opine！？https://medium.com/coinmonks/t...
@TheDanDraper1 The key question is, "Was it settled onchain or offchain?". If settled offchain, was it collateralized through conditional value transfer through wallets with private keys?
The fact that it was non-deliverable likely means offchain, but collateralization needs to be done onchain
@关键的问题是，“它是在链上解决还是在链外解决？”。如果在链外结算，是否通过带私钥的钱包进行有条件的价值转移进行抵押？
不可交付的事实可能意味着链外交易，但抵押需要在链上完成
I read this, and it is simplistic and not fleshed out yet https://forum.sushi.com/t/sush.... Some thoughts"
* the only way to avoid US & Japan legal liability is to operate solely outside the US/JP.
** that means NO US/Japanese users
** NO US/Japan nodes
** NO US/Japan tech, ie, swaps, ETH https://twitter.com/TheDanDrap...
Is the @SushiSwap $SUSHI Swiss Proposal A Clever Escape for U.S. Patent Liabilities?
We've been asked about the $SUSHI news relating to matters of U.S. No. 11,196,566 (@ReggieMiddleton) and U.S. No. 10,025,797 (@InventFi )
short answer appears "no" under 271(g) and 271(f) https://t.co/ztgfqXsmNp
我读过这篇文章，它过于简单化，还没有具体化https://forum.sushi.com/t/sush....“一些想法”
*避开我们的唯一方法&；日本的法律责任是仅在美国/日本以外的地区运营。
**这意味着没有美国/日本用户
**没有美国/日本节点
**没有美国/日本技术，即互换，ETHhttps://twitter.com/TheDanDrap...
@SushiSwap$SUSHI-swap-swap-Swiss-Swiss提案是美国专利责任的巧妙逃避吗？
我们被问及有关美国第11196566号（@reggiemidleton）和美国第10025797号（@InventFi）事件的美元寿司新闻
在271（g）和271（f）项下，简短回答为“否”https://t.co/ztgfqXsmNp
@UtilityHodler @JohnEDeaton1 @novogratz No, I'm not talking about circumstantial evidence, conspiracy theories (even if they're true, which the above looks to be) or anything of that sort. I'm looking for exactly how the deal was put together.
@实用性Hodler@JohnEDeaton1@novogratz不，我不是在谈论间接证据、阴谋论（即使它们是真的，上面看起来是真的）或诸如此类的东西。我想知道这笔交易是如何达成的。
I'm quite curious to know exactly how this deal was put together. Anyone know?
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/2...
我很想知道这笔交易是如何达成的。有人知道吗？
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/2...
This requires scrutiny and discussion as well. https://twitter.com/sinoTrinit...
@oudekaas3 @VitalikButerin All the criticisms of bitcoin in the eth whitepaper are debunked https://link.medium.com/qCxtrs...
发表时间：4年前 作者：xhliu @sinoTrinity这也需要仔细审查和讨论。https://twitter.com/sinoTrinit...
@oudekaas3@VitalikButerin eth白皮书中对比特币的所有批评都被揭穿https://link.medium.com/qCxtrs...
I'd like the more technically astute among my followers to weight in on this. It deserves discussion. https://twitter.com/oudekaas3/...
research it? If not, isn’t that gross negligence towards investors?
Why did Craig know in 2015 Bitcoin is turing complete?
Bitcoin is turing complete using unrolled loops with script..... https://scryptdoc.readthedocs....
As is shown with scrypt on BSV.... nog GAS required! https://t.co/f8GWEIDV25
我希望我的追随者中技术上更精明的人也能参与进来。这值得讨论。https://twitter.com/oudekaas3/...
研究一下？如果不是，这不是对投资者的严重疏忽吗？
为什么克雷格在2015年知道比特币是图灵完整的？
比特币是图灵完成的，使用脚本展开循环。。。。。https://scryptdoc.readthedocs....
如BSV上的scrypt所示。。。。不需要汽油！https://t.co/f8GWEIDV25