@TheDanDraper1 @4rch02 @weatherbuzzword @GetITFromMike @WRBillingsley @uspto @JoeBiden @a16z @BainCapCrypto Discussing modeling @coinbase investment in @compoundfinance #DAO, my lead dev & lead forensic analyst asked me why VCs were buying buying governance tokens with no claim on IP, patent(s)/pending, nor any claims on cashflows. I said "I dunno, maybe maximizing return adjusted risk

@Dandraper1@4rch02@weatherbuzzword@Getitfrom Mike@WRBillingsley@uspto@JoeBiden@a16z@BainCapCrypto讨论建模@coinbase investment in@compoundfinance#DAO，我的首席开发人员；首席法医分析师问我，为什么风投在购买治理代币时没有对知识产权、专利/未决或现金流提出任何索赔。我说“我不知道，也许是最大化回报调整后的风险。”

@TheDanDraper1 @4rch02 @weatherbuzzword @GetITFromMike @WRBillingsley @uspto @JoeBiden @a16z @BainCapCrypto On the team conference call this morning, I coined conventional #DAO investing "return adjusted risk"!
:-)

@在今天上午的团队电话会议上，我创造了传统的DAO投资“回报调整风险”！
:-)

@blockchainfitz @vamosvigilante @kurtwuckertjr Let's dance!

@blockchainfitz@Vamoswilligate@kurtwuckertjr让我们跳舞吧！

@thejessejensen @kyashjp @blocks i guess we need to look into that, don't we?

@Jessejensen@kyashjp@街区我想我们需要调查一下，不是吗？

@WRBillingsley @weatherbuzzword @GetITFromMike @uspto @JoeBiden Correction: 14, and counting...

@WRBillingsley@weatherbuzzword@GetITFromMike@uspto@JoeBiden更正：14，正在计数。。。

@TheDanDraper1 I am fairly familiar with the strategy being used, and honestly.... I don't see how a summary judgement in favor of the @InventFi can be avoided.
If @MakerDAO responds, then it proves there's a centralized entity to go after. If there's no such entity, then... summary judgement!

@Andraper1我对正在使用的策略相当熟悉，老实说。。。。我不明白怎样才能避免对@InventFi做出有利于它的简要判断。
如果@MakerDAO做出响应，那么它就证明了有一个集中的实体需要追求。如果没有这样的实体，那么。。。即决判决！

RT: @ShibaAkitaWolf @ReggieMiddleton @THETA_ECOSYSTEM @THETAtv @Theta_Network IMHO:
Code pirates looking for the big buy-out open their future purchasers to obsolescence, blackmail & worse by stealing patented code.
Stolen code WILL be prosecuted - especially Middleton’s🦁
Investors must nip in the bud or own💩
Signed: Old enough to remember phreaking

转发：@ShibaAkitaWolf@reggiemidleton@THETA_生态系统@THETAtv@THETA_网络IMHO:
代码盗版者正在寻找大规模收购，这让他们未来的买家面临淘汰、敲诈等风险；更糟糕的是窃取专利代码。
被盗代码将被起诉，尤其是米德尔顿的🦁
投资者必须防患于未然，否则就必须持有股份💩
签名：年纪大了，还记得说话吗

@Tyrone15232018 @CryptoNomadLFC @dao_veri @Veritaseuminc Look here https://t.me/William_VeRI

@Tyrone15232018@CryptoNomadLFC@dao_veri@Veritaseuminc看看这里https://t.me/William_VeRI

@TheDanDraper1 I'm waiting for the first jurisdictional dispute to a DLT patent, for jurisdiction is a lot trickier than those lawyers not well-versed in crypto mechanics may believe. Riddle me this... If US has 23% of active nodes, is the use of a node(s) by foreign actors giving jurisdiction

@我正在等待DLT专利的第一次管辖权争议，因为管辖权比那些不精通密码机制的律师可能认为的要复杂得多。给我猜这个谜语。。。如果美国拥有23%的活动节点，那么外国行为者使用节点是否具有管辖权

@TheDanDraper1 The WY "fix" while well done, and elegant (kudos and hats off to them), is still, as you said, only at state level. >risk is at the federal level.
As for IP issues, so many are off the mark. A strong patent in the US, China, Japan (or to a lesser extent EU) effects whole industry

@正如你所说，虽然WY“修复”做得很好，很优雅（对他们表示敬意和敬意），但它仍然只是在州一级>；风险在联邦层面。
至于知识产权问题，那么多都是不恰当的。在美国、中国、日本（或在较小程度上在欧盟）拥有强大的专利会影响整个行业

@TheDanDraper1 Well, considering how effectively the SEC shut down the ICO space (though I truly disagree with their enforcement tactics), I think it's both proven and acknowledged that there is no immunity from legal or regulatory challenge. The patent law issue will likely cut deeper then SEC

@考虑到SEC关闭ICO空间的有效性（尽管我真的不同意他们的执法策略），我认为已经证明并承认没有法律或监管挑战的豁免权。专利法问题可能会比SEC更为严重

We're running scenarios where @square A) gets its credit line pulled (worse case scenario) and B) has constraints on additional funding (more likely scenario).
#Block @square has been served with notice of infringement, these scenarios are realistic. See https://boombustblog.com/compo... https://t.co/zVPErY4bdi

我们正在运行这样的场景：@square A）的信用额度被取消（更糟糕的场景），B）对额外资金有限制（更可能的场景）。
#Block@square已收到侵权通知，这些场景是现实的。看见https://boombustblog.com/compo... https://t.co/zVPErY4bdi

I'd put legal risk ahead of coding risk. DAOs are built mostly by devs who have at least a modicum of knowledge in risk mgmt, re: code audits, best practices, etc.
On J&S liability & patent infringement side, they seem CLUELESS. 3x damages can be avoided by paying license fees https://twitter.com/TheDanDrap...

我会把法律风险放在编码风险之前。DAO主要由在风险管理、代码审计、最佳实践等方面至少有一点知识的开发人员构建。
关于J&；S.责任和义务；专利侵权方面，他们似乎一无所知。支付许可证费用可以避免3倍的损失https://twitter.com/TheDanDrap...

Finally someone (besides me) is stating what should be obvious to all if they were actually paying attention. Bitcoins are #NFTs https://youtu.be/e48Mk-D3aIo?t...
See the video above cast in laypersons terms, then the summary/synopsis below. https://twitter.com/kurtwucker...

最后，有人（除了我之外）在说，如果他们真的在注意的话，什么应该是显而易见的。比特币是#NFThttps://youtu.be/e48Mk-D3aIo?t...
请看上面以外行术语播放的视频，然后是下面的摘要/概要。https://twitter.com/kurtwucker...

@CryptoNomadLFC @Tyrone15232018 @dao_veri @Veritaseuminc Which is what crypto is truly all about. Reliance on authoritative 3rd parties are what we are trying to minimize.

@CryptoNomadLFC@Tyrone15232018@dao_veri@Veritaseuminc这就是crypto真正的意义所在。我们正努力减少对权威第三方的依赖。

@StevenYeager74 @ErikVoorhees Read the statement that you are replying to again, very slowly, word by word. You are debating a statement that you say you agree with.

@Steveny74@ErikVoorhees逐字逐句地阅读你正在回复的声明。你在辩论一份你表示同意的声明。

@CRE8ZION @ethereum @solana @Ripple @Bitcoin It really is... Just that simple!

@CRE8ZION@ethereum@solana@Ripple@Bitcoin真的是。。。就这么简单！

RT: We have NOMINATED @ReggieMiddleton for the prestigious @USPTO #NMTI award for his innovative, disruptive, and GROUNDBREAKING work as THE patented creator and inventor of #DeFi (decentralized finance). We want letters of recommendation so @JoeBiden can HONOR our Brother. Thanks.

RT：我们已经提名@ReggieMiddleton获得著名的@USPTO#NMTI奖，表彰他作为#DeFi（分散化金融）专利创造者和发明家的创新性、颠覆性和开创性工作。我们想要推荐信，这样@JoeBiden就能尊敬我们的兄弟了。谢谢

@will48234823 @ErikVoorhees I can go down a list, but I don't have the time. I have to bow out of this discussion, because I have work to do.

@will48234823@ErikVoorhees我可以列个清单，但我没有时间。我不得不退出这次讨论，因为我还有工作要做。

@BimboHammed @ErikVoorhees You apparently failed to imbibe the entire statement. It was about not being a member of the socioeconomic majority.
By your own definition, that means your statement speaks to your "own self imposed limitations", but I will not go there, because I don't know you like that. Hmm..

@BimboHammed@ErikVoorhees你显然没能理解整个陈述。这是关于不成为社会经济多数群体的一员。
根据你自己的定义，这意味着你的陈述说明了你“自我施加的限制”，但我不会去那里，因为我不知道你喜欢那样。隐马尔可夫模型。。