RT: For those in the #crypto space interested in the
@Veritaseuminc usecase, @ReggieMiddleton
explains here https://youtube.com/watch?v=rv... https://t.co/uVpzC0Tmal

RT：对于那些在加密领域对
@Veritaseuminc用例@ReggieMiddleton
这里解释https://youtube.com/watch?v=rv... https://t.co/uVpzC0Tmal

Reggie explains the use case for Veritaseum https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Reggie explains the use case for veritaseumhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Read "Is DeFi’s Greatest Invention Legal Risk Transfer?"
I'm going to release a similar analytical piece in a few hours, but apparently I was beaten to the punch.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

阅读“DeFi最伟大的发明是合法的风险转移吗？”
我将在几个小时后发布一篇类似的分析文章，但显然我被打败了。
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

@waterssamuel Direct asset purchases is what the big CBs have been doing. The jig appears to be up.

@大型哥伦比亚广播公司一直在做的就是直接购买资产。吉格舞似乎已经开始了。

Lack of IP Due Diligence in the Crypto Space is Downright Appalling, Expect Stakeholder Suits Momentarily.
This is bad enough to potentially amount to breach of fiduciary duty, IMO (I'm no legal expert). I offered my card, but she left it on the table
https://youtu.be/hJGWLTd3CH8 https://t.co/85Qw0m8jU7

在加密领域缺乏知识产权尽职调查是彻头彻尾的骇人听闻，预计利益相关者会立即提起诉讼。
国际海事组织（IMO）（我不是法律专家）称，这已经严重到可能构成违反信托义务的地步。我把名片给了她，但她把它忘在桌上了
https://youtu.be/hJGWLTd3CH8 https://t.co/85Qw0m8jU7

@MrSteedly Not explicitly. Payment is only received when voluntary licensing occurs, or when a jury awards it.
Of course, citation does mean that there's a material (very) chance of infringement occurring if said tech is brought to market.

@先生显然没有明确表示。只有在自愿许可或陪审团裁决时，才会收到付款。
当然，引用确实意味着，如果将上述技术推向市场，就有很大（非常）可能发生侵权。

Our patents receive a new citation every ~two and a half wks, meaning our patented IP is base layer for much of the new crypto inventions submitted to patent office.
I'd like to liken our P2P capital market patent '566 to US174,465. You know that story!
https://boombustblog.com/compo... https://t.co/4o5a1dys5W

我们的专利每两周半就会收到一次新的引用，这意味着我们的专利IP是提交给专利局的许多新密码发明的基础层。
我想把我们的P2P资本市场专利'566比作US174465。你知道那个故事！
https://boombustblog.com/compo... https://t.co/4o5a1dys5W

For those who aren't well macro-versed, the days of unbounded QE are over and we're in uncharted territory. QE has been the faux-solution du jour since Japan invented it in the 1980s (ref. 40 yr lost decade) & every CB since copied them despite fact it never worked. Smart crypto? https://t.co/nfdomuSb7h

对于那些不熟悉宏观经济的人来说，无限量量化宽松的日子已经结束，我们正处在一个未知的领域。自从日本在20世纪80年代发明量化宽松以来，量化宽松一直是一种人造的解决方案；此后，每个CB都复制了它们，尽管事实上它从未起作用。智能加密？https://t.co/nfdomuSb7h

@TeamSatoshi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github This statement makes absolutely no sense.
The quality of this thread has diminished significantly
Let's simply put an end to it. I thought I could glean an answer from the wisdom of the crowd, but the alas that is not the case.
Have a good day..

@TeamSatoshi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github这句话毫无意义。
这根线的质量已经大大降低了
让我们简单地结束它。我以为我能从人群的智慧中得到答案，但可惜事实并非如此。
祝您今天过得愉快。。

@TeamSatoshi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github Only assertion that I have here is that from my objective observations, both the pro & con CSW camps are so deeply ensconced in their feelings that they can't have a polite, professional, non-confrontational conversation. I asked a simple question, ~40% of responses were insults!

@TeamSatoshi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github我在这里唯一的断言是，从我的客观观察来看；con CSW夏令营深陷于他们的情感之中，以至于他们无法进行礼貌、专业、非对抗性的对话。我问了一个简单的问题，~40%的回答都是侮辱！

@TeamSatoshi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github "Your point seems valid" is "word salad?"?
It is amazing how you guys communicate.
I give up!

@TeamSatoshi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github“你的观点似乎有效”是“单词沙拉”吗？
你们沟通的方式真是太棒了。
我放弃！

@TeamSatoshi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github CSW detractors spend more energy in personal attacks than empirically disproving his attestations, significantly fracturing credibility, making objective truth seekers' jobs difficult due to the noise.
Your point seems valid, but pro-CSW camp's referencing https://scrypt.io/

@TeamSatoshi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github CSW诽谤者在人身攻击上花费的精力比在经验上反驳他的证词要多，这大大破坏了可信度，由于噪音，客观真相寻求者的工作变得困难。
你的观点似乎是正确的，但支持CSW阵营https://scrypt.io/

@CryptoQuantum @RaoulGMI No need to fret. Patented IP doesn't just go away. If it is foundational, it actually does just the opposite. It becomes deeper ingrained, and more significant, as each day goes on - whether prevalent in the media or not.

@CryptoQuantum@RaoulGMI无需担心。专利知识产权不会消失。如果它是基础性的，它实际上做的恰恰相反。随着时间的推移，它变得更加根深蒂固，也更加重要——无论是否在媒体上流行。

@btckershi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github Dude! Why are you continuing this? I clearly said, more than once, that the guy who posted your video deleted it's credibility. I also told you that ad hominem statement was not directed towards you or your video.
Yet, you are still coming with this. Enough. Chill!

@btckershi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github Dude！你为什么继续这样？我不止一次明确地说，发布你视频的人删除了它的可信度。我还告诉过你，ad Homeem声明并不是针对你或你的视频的。
然而，你仍然带着这个。足够地寒冷

@btckershi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github There is nothing to concede. No one claimed your video was an ad hominem attack. I think you need to go back and reread the thread.
The person that posted your video did so as part of an ad hominem, detracting from his credibility, thus disincentivizing me to watch your video

@btckershi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github没有什么可以让步的。没有人声称你的视频是广告人攻击。我想你需要回去重读这篇文章。
发布你的视频的人是作为广告的一部分这样做的，这降低了他的可信度，因此阻止了我观看你的视频

@gardling @WolfgangLohmann This man has directly addressed the question. What do those who assert that Bitcoin is turing complete have to say about his claim?

@gardling@WolfgangLohmann这个人直接回答了这个问题。那些断言比特币是图灵完全的人对他的说法有什么看法？

@btckershi @cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github Ad hominem means "(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining."
He didn't attack me, but he did attack CSW. Mentioning failing a class is not the topic of conversation, yet he used it to attack. Stick to the topic at hand.

@btckershi@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github Ad homeem的意思是“针对某人的争论或反应”，而不是针对他们所持的立场。”
他没有攻击我，但他攻击了CSW。提到一门课不及格并不是谈话的主题，但他用它来攻击。坚持手头的话题。

@gardling @WolfgangLohmann Missing the goal of discussion, thereby diluting & littering the thread.
Query: Is #Bitcoin or #BSV functionally turing complete?
Answer MUST contain provably true facts & empirical argument.
Answer MUST NOT contain ad hominem or tertiary BS. I don't care about plagiarism

@gardling@WolfgangLohmann错过了讨论的目标，从而稀释了&；乱丢线。
问题：#比特币还是#BSV功能图灵完整？
答案必须包含可证明的真实事实；经验论证。
答案不得包含原始答案或三级B。我不在乎剽窃

@cyberat2600 @Dr_CSWright @github I seem to be one of them (presumably, a cult member) because I tell you to refrain from ad hominem attacks and stick to empirical points and relevant facts when trying to make an argument?
Your absence will not be missed in this thread, my friend, Enjoy life.

@cyberat2600@Dr_CSWright@github我似乎是其中之一（大概是一名邪教成员），因为我告诉你，在试图进行辩论时，不要进行人身攻击，并坚持经验观点和相关事实？
我的朋友，在这篇文章中，你的缺席不会被错过，享受生活吧。

RT: We have dozens of hours of EPIC interviews on topics such as:
- Father of DeFi @ReggieMiddleton
- #Bitcoin DeFi w/ @SovrynBTC
- Crypto and Child Support
- #Bitcoin Legends @Davincij15
- The amazing @clif_high
.. And more!!
https://youtube.com/playlist?l...

RT：我们有几十个小时的史诗式访谈，主题包括：
-德菲之父@ReggieMiddleton
-#比特币定义w/@SovrynBTC
-加密和儿童抚养
-#比特币传奇@Davincij15
-令人惊叹的@clif_高中
…还有更多！！
https://youtube.com/playlist?l...