@Blockworks_ SEC has alleged our marketing of patent applications to be fraudulent, yet those same patent apps have become granted patents. If the proposed exchange definition happens, SEC "may" (I'm no lawyer) have mandated exchanges infringe our "fraudulent" '566 patent to operate. Ironic? https://t.co/GtnIDX6PC6
@Blockworks_uuSEC指控我们对专利申请的营销存在欺诈行为,但这些专利申请已被授予专利。如果拟议的交易所定义发生了,SEC“可能”(我不是律师)已经授权交易所侵犯我们的“欺诈”566专利。反语的https://t.co/GtnIDX6PC6