@alrhemistt The predecessor to Vyper was called Serpent.
https://github.com/ethereum/se...
@Vyper的前身alrhemistt被称为蛇。
https://github.com/ethereum/se...
用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息
@dhaiwat10 @crypdoughdoteth I wrote the earliest versions of Vyper!
https://github.com/vyperlang/v...
So glad to see a competent team working for so long to turn it into a great fully-fledged language.
@dhaiwat10@crypdoughteth我写了Vyper的最早版本！
https://github.com/vyperlang/v...
很高兴看到一个能干的团队工作了这么长时间，把它变成了一种成熟的语言。
Vyper is quietly continuing to progress and become a better and better Ethereum high-level language.
https://vyper.readthedocs.io/e...
https://vyper-by-example.org/
Great and hardworking team @vyperlang and many community contributors. https://t.co/gBdhpnuvp0
Vyper正在悄悄地继续发展，成为一种越来越好的以太坊高级语言。
https://vyper.readthedocs.io/e...
https://vyper-by-example.org/
伟大而勤奋的团队@vyperlang和许多社区贡献者。https://t.co/gBdhpnuvp0
@FUCORY How are the economics here at all different between PoW and PoS?
@FUCORY PoW和PoS的经济学有什么不同？
@zengjiajun_eth Wechat definitely far outperforms google et al on ease of account recovery.
@曾家俊（zengjiajun_）在账户恢复的便利性方面肯定远远优于谷歌（google）等。
@zengjiajun_eth Errr I hope it's much easier!
(From all the experiences I've heard, recovering a web2 account is often extremely hard)
@曾家俊：我希望这会容易得多！
（根据我所听到的所有经验，恢复web2帐户通常非常困难）
@NathanpmYoung Counterpoint: if AGI happens the world will be either utopia or paperclips and our actions today don't matter, so it's actually correct to silo between (i) working to increase the chance the AI transition goes well and (ii) thinking about other issues under assumption of no AGI
@NathanpmYoung对位：如果AGI发生，世界将要么是乌托邦，要么是回形针，我们今天的行动无关紧要，因此实际上正确的做法是：（i）努力增加人工智能过渡顺利进行的机会；（ii）在假设没有AGI的情况下思考其他问题
Proposals to adjust memory gas costs
Doc: https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb...
EthMag thread for discussion: https://ethereum-magicians.org...
调整内存气体成本的建议
文件：https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb。。。
EthMag讨论线程：https://ethereum-magicians.org...
@wongisrite @jamesdueck @TrustlessState @daveefreiburger These weren't laceless, they came with laces and I took the laces out.
@Wongistrite@jamesdueck@TrustlessState@daveefreiburger这些不是没有鞋带的，它们带有鞋带，我把鞋带拿了出来。
@TrustlessState @wongisrite @daveefreiburger I did as of this morning!
@TrustlessState@Wongistrite@daveefreiburger我今天早上就这么做了！
@SmthWckd @0FJAKE It's actually quite nontrivial to go through the procedures to change your state name in a lot of cases.
@事实上，在很多情况下，通过程序更改州名是非常重要的。
@0FJAKE You get an instant like for using "legal name" instead of "real name"!
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...
Please stop using "real name" to refer to your passport name. Your government doesn't get to define who you "really" are. If you use a different name in most day-to-day interactions, that is your real name.
"Passport name", "legal name", "slave name" to be edgy are all fine.
@0FJAKE你用“法定名称”而不是“真名”会得到一个瞬间的喜欢！
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...
请停止使用“真名”来指代您的护照名。你的政府无法定义你“真正”是谁。如果你在大多数日常互动中使用不同的名字，那就是你的真名。
“护照名”、“法定名”、“奴隶名”都可以用。
@least_nathan @sonyasupposedly And https://slatestarcodex.com/201...
@至少nathan@sonyasupposedly和https://slatestarcodex.com/201...
@least_nathan I guess in mechanism design there is the assumption that the mechanism itself is supposed to lead to good outcomes if nobody colludes.
If the mechanism is broken, then yeah you're not in that world. Alternatively, you could collude to balance out other people who are colluding!
@至少，我想在机制设计中有一个假设，即如果没有人串通，机制本身应该会产生良好的结果。
如果机械装置坏了，那么是的，你不在那个世界。或者，你可以串通来平衡其他正在串通的人！
@least_nathan So "violating the intent of a mechanism" and "globally net good vs net bad" are different axes, agree!
@至少，“违背机制意图”和“全球净善与净恶”是不同的轴，同意！
@least_nathan I'd say a key factor is whether or not you're violating the intent of some broader mechanism.
@至少我要说的是，一个关键因素是，你是否违反了某些更广泛机制的意图。
@WillWaitz @least_nathan I am indeed a proud rootless cosmopolitan.
(More precise than "globalist" imo; some use "globalist" to mean supporting a global government, and I'm not in that camp)
I do have plenty of commitments though! https://t.co/hhnHH1hOsN
@WillWaitz@至少nathan我确实是一个自豪的无根世界主义者。
（在我看来，这比“全球主义者”更准确；有些人用“全球主义者”来表示支持全球政府，而我不在这个阵营中）
不过我有很多承诺！https://t.co/hhnHH1hOsN
@least_nathan But yeah, it definitely is easy to misuse words and just get them to mean "stuff I like" and "stuff I don't like".
Though I'll add that this happens to just about every word!
Compare: "REAL freedom requires basic human dignity which includes public healthcare!"
@至少nathan是的，很容易误用单词，让它们表示“我喜欢的东西”和“我不喜欢的东西”。
不过我要补充的是，这几乎发生在每个单词上！
比较一下：“真正的自由需要基本的人的尊严，其中包括公共医疗！”
@least_nathan I do have a very clear definition of collusion that I use! https://t.co/lZw52zpl77
@至少nathan我对我使用的共谋有一个非常明确的定义！https://t.co/lZw52zpl77
@tegmark Big thanks to the Shiba Inu community, whose cryptocurrency made these fellowships possible!
@tegmark非常感谢Shiba Inu社区，他们的加密货币使这些研究金成为可能！