@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ That's just factually wrong. The evidence is right there. ("Evidence" isn't conclusive, of course, but this is a careful, well-designed study which does show strong *extremely* strong evidence of effect p<0.001.)
@kknnaabb @_mbdr_ 这实际上是错误的。证据就在那里。 （当然，“证据”不是决定性的，但这是一项精心设计的精心设计的研究，确实显示了强有力的*非常*强有力的证据证明了 p