@Wizard_of_Ouzo @dao_veri @GeorgeSiosi No, it implies what happened occurred in the past. There is no contractual obligation for Ve to stand behind the VERI token, for that was destroyed by the SEC's actions. If that makes you uncomfortable, then by all means be so. It's understandable. Some still see value, though.
@Wizard_of_Ouzo @dao_veri @GeorgeSiosi 不，它暗示过去发生的事情。 Ve 没有合同义务支持 VERI 代币，因为 SEC 的行动破坏了这一点。如果这让你感到不舒服，那么无论如何都是这样。这是可以理解的。不过，有些人仍然看到了价值。