@Poppendieck @linseymarr @DrPieterPeach @DocJeffD @MackayIM @Don_Milton @jljcolorado That same paper hypothesizes that vigorous group activity outdoors may still present a risk. Outdoor ventilation is naturally better, but 25-49x risk multiplier is a lot.
I don't know if this has been since observed in practice.
@Poppendieck @linseymarr @DrPieterPeach @DocJeffD @MackayIM @Don_Milton @jljcolorado 同一篇论文假设户外剧烈的集体活动可能仍然存在风险。室外通风自然更好，但 25-49 倍的风险乘数很多。
我不知道这是否已经在实践中观察到。