@michaelmina_lab @alexmeshkin To be more clear, there is a level of risk reduction that is too low to be useful because the failure rate is so high the outcome is effectively the same on a similar time scale. Where that is, I don't know. 90% might not be that. 30% risk reduction certainly would be.
@michaelmina_lab @alexmeshkin 更清楚地说，风险降低水平太低而无用，因为失败率如此之高，结果在相似的时间尺度上实际上是相同的。那是哪里，我不知道。 90%可能不是这样。 30% 的风险当然会降低。