@danaludwig @kareneolson @StephTaitWrites @ahandvanish China, of course, is 2-4 grid lines lower, so 99%-99.99% lower.
Elimination is almost magic, when achievable. But the above point that Japan may have accomplished a preferred cost-benefit is still worth considering.

@当然,danaludwig@kareneolson@StephTaitWrites@ahandvanish China的网格线要低2-4条,所以要低99%-99.99%。
消除几乎是魔术,如果可以实现的话。但上述日本可能实现了首选成本效益的观点仍然值得考虑。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin