@PPathole @Twitter Any sensible random sampling process is fine. If many people independently get similar results for % of fake/spam/duplicate accounts, that will be telling.
I picked 100 as the sample size number, because that is what Twitter uses to calculate <5% fake/spam/duplicate.
@PPathole@Twitter任何合理的随机抽样过程都可以。如果许多人在%的虚假/垃圾邮件/重复账户中独立获得类似的结果，这就说明了问题。
我选择了100作为样本量，因为这是Twitter用来计算的<；5%虚假/垃圾邮件/重复。