@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral Cost benefit, agree of course. It is doubtful that any of the places that suppressed had greater impacts than those that didn't. Specifics matter of course, eg. measures at schools and (ugh) parks vs restaurants.
"Moderate" mitigation is probably the worst strategy of all.
@凯瑟琳78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral成本效益，当然同意。令人怀疑的是，任何一个被压制的地方都比那些没有压制的地方产生了更大的影响。细节当然很重要，例如学校和（呃）公园与餐厅的措施。
“适度”缓解可能是最糟糕的策略。