RT: @ErikVoorhees @0xca333 @THORChain @AtomicDEX Even though liquidity is indeed lower than most EVM-style DEXes, Atomics are superior in security due to their simplicity when compared to the EVM-like pools/contracts. Not to mention impermanent loss. How about working together and fixing the liquidity issue on atomic swaps?

转发:@ErikVoorhees@0xca333@THORChain@AtomicDEX尽管流动性确实低于大多数EVM类型的指数,但与EVM类型的池/合约相比,原子型指数由于其简单性,在安全性方面更优越。更不用说短暂的损失了。一起合作解决原子互换的流动性问题怎么样?

发表时间:1年前 作者:Komodo @KomodoPlatform