@jmcrookston Statements like "no proof _____" are often strictly speaking accurate but irrelevant. You don't operate an incident response (or anything else in the real world) in basis of proof or lack of proof. Success rests on weighing probabilities and contingencies.
@像“无证据”这样的jmcrookston陈述通常严格来说是准确的，但并不相关。你不会在证据或缺乏证据的基础上操作事件响应（或现实世界中的其他任何事情）。成功取决于权衡可能性和偶然性。