@butts_4_jesus @TheAngryEpi @Walgreens It's showing rate of change. Unless there is a marked shift in the subsample of people getting their tests in walgreens, that should be fine. Just understand it for what it is. e.g. increase from a low level may still be low; decrease from a high level may still be high.
@butts_4_jesus@TheAngryEpi@Walgreens这显示了变化的速度。除非在沃尔格林接受测试的人的子样本发生显著变化，否则这应该没问题。只要理解它是什么。e、 g.较低水平的增长可能仍然很低；从高水平下降可能仍然很高。