@Linklevosstwins @C52867822 @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @UgurMersin61 @gun52slingers @tbr90 @chainlink @Amberdataio @ChainlinkoracIe @TheLinkbull @LinkiesLeaks @Don_ChainLink @LinkWarLord @LINKNewsOracle I beg to differ on that. 1st mover advantage and market penetration will not be so advantageous if they are infringing on a patent in running their primary business and that patent holder decides to, or is already in that business. They can essentially be shut down. Risk is real!

@Linklevosstwins@C52867822@TheAndRaper1@ChainLinkGod@UgurMersin61@gun52slingers@tbr90@chainlink@Amberdatio@ChainlinkoracIe@TheLinkbull@LinkiesLeaks@Don_ChainLinkWarord@LINKNewsOracle我对这一点不敢苟同。如果他们在经营其主要业务时侵犯了一项专利，而该专利持有人决定或已经在该业务中，则先发优势和市场渗透将不会如此有利。它们基本上可以被关闭。风险是真的！