@eliowa @crabb_vicki The report confuses false discovery rate with false positive rate, and then the tweet mislabels the study as PCR rather than antigen.
@eliowa@crabb_vicki该报告混淆了假发现率和假阳性率，然后推文错误地将该研究标记为PCR而非抗原。
@eliowa @crabb_vicki The report confuses false discovery rate with false positive rate, and then the tweet mislabels the study as PCR rather than antigen.
@eliowa@crabb_vicki该报告混淆了假发现率和假阳性率，然后推文错误地将该研究标记为PCR而非抗原。