@nullpackets @nominal_broom @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital @CornellUnivers @initc3org 1) I can tell you haven't read the patent. You do realist hat is not my patent, don't you?
2) The patent represents government recognized ownership of property. Yes, the right to sue comes with that. Would Chainlink exercise their right to sue if I took their hardware property?

@nullpackets@nominal_broom@thedraper1@ChainLinkGod@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital@CornellUnivers@initc3org 1）我可以告诉你，你还没有读过这项专利。你知道现实主义的帽子不是我的专利，不是吗？
2） 该专利代表政府承认的财产所有权。是的，起诉权也随之而来。如果我拿走他们的硬件财产，Chainlink会行使他们的起诉权吗？