@HalCranmer @ChrisACole @IslandPirates77 @elaine_hali @J_D_Klein It shows lack of scientific competence and credibility on the part of the critic.
In this specific case, "Not statistically significant" refers to only a small part of the results but he fails to even acknowledge that most of results ARE. Bad faith.
Can't have it both ways.
@HalCranmer@ChrisACole@IslandPirates77@elaine_hali@J_D_Klein这表明评论家缺乏科学能力和可信度。
在这种特殊情况下，“无统计学意义”指的只是结果的一小部分，但他甚至没有承认大多数结果都是有意义的。恶意
不能两全其美。