@HalCranmer @ChrisACole @IslandPirates77 @elaine_hali @J_D_Klein That's not what the data in this study show. The data show that they're probably effective, but not at the mostly-arbitrary p=0.05 level. Instead of was p=0.10.
Probably effective but can't be sure is a reasonable interpretion.
@HalCranmer@ChrisACole@IslandPirates77@elaine_hali@J_D_Klein这不是本研究中的数据所显示的。数据显示，它们可能是有效的，但在大多数任意的p=0.05水平上并不有效。而不是p=0.10。
可能有效，但不能确定这是一个合理的解释。