@BestinthePNW_ @drlucymcbride @kprather88 It wasn't that small. You have to look more closely and see that their intervention was "encouraging masking". The increase in masking was small but when you scale the transmission effect it comes to about 25% IIRC. Reducing R by 25% at population level usually a huge difference.
@BestinPNW_@drlucymcbride@kprather88它没那么小。你必须更仔细地观察，看到他们的干预是“鼓励掩饰”。掩蔽的增加很小，但当你缩放传输效果时，它会达到约25%的IIRC。在人口水平上将R降低25%通常是一个巨大的差异。