@Marco_Piani Sure, there is an element of protecting vulnerable that was reasonable, AND WAS BEING DONE (of course, as with many things could be done better). This was never a *credible* alternative to other measures, since it was already being done and the other measures were still needed.
@Marco_Piani当然，保护弱势群体的一个要素是合理的，而且正在做（当然，许多事情可以做得更好）。这从来不是其他措施的“可信”替代方案，因为它已经在实施，其他措施仍然需要。