@Nutmeg031992 @trvrb I think some of that is much worse vax coverage in high risk populations (e.g. >65). Hard to tell exactly how bad because vax statistics are pretty bad too.
I think the ratio in the US is >6x. Perhaps 7x or 8x.
@肉豆蔻031992@trvrb我认为在高危人群（例如，>；65）中，其中一些vax覆盖率要差得多。很难说到底有多糟糕，因为vax统计数据也很糟糕。
我认为美国的比例是>；6倍。可能是7倍或8倍。