@amysoyka @CBadcock @ProfPCDoherty @certifiedwise @ConversationEDU This doesn't imply (or not) covid.

@amysoyka @CBadcock @ProfPCDoherty @certifiedwise @ConversationEDU 这并不意味着（或不）covid。

@AndrewNoymer @MullingMueller That's beside the point. There ARE people who believe it is a leaked bioweapon and some who have claimed it (not necessarily the same), and many of those are still often minimizers.
The only way that makes sense is if it is a really dumb/ineffective bioweapon.

@AndrewNoymer @MullingMueller 这不是重点。有些人认为它是一种泄露的生物武器，有些人声称它（不一定相同），其中许多人仍然经常是最小化者。
唯一有意义的方法是它是否是一种非常愚蠢/无效的生物武器。

@juicedpotato @seirl_ @B_helpdesk @Noahpinion @wtogami I think ground source will still work for most.

@juicedpotato @seirl_ @B_helpdesk @Noahpinion @wtogami 我认为地面源仍然适用于大多数人。

@jmcrookston People were using masks at the time right? Without source control you might get different results from the surface samples.

@jmcrookston 人们当时在使用口罩，对吗？如果没有源代码控制，您可能会从表面样本中获得不同的结果。

@gardengirl778 @j_g_allen Masks not mentioned there, even as e.g. South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, etc were already using them effectively. He was always an anti masker.

@gardengirl778 @j_g_allen 那里没有提到面具，即使是例如韩国、日本、台湾、新加坡等已经在有效地使用它们。他一直是一个反蒙面者。

@marc_lepage @FourWinns298 @DFisman I don't think they tested a 4th dose. But probably similar to 3rd if time has passed.

@marc_lepage @FourWinns298 @DFisman 我不认为他们测试了第四剂。但如果时间过去了，可能类似于第 3 次。

@marc_lepage @FourWinns298 @DFisman From the article
"The two bivalent vaccines increased mouse neutralizing antibodies against BA.1 and BA.5 significantly more than a third shot of the original vaccine"

@marc_lepage @FourWinns298 @DFisman 来自文章
“这两种二价疫苗增加了针对 BA.1 和 BA.5 的小鼠中和抗体，显着超过了原始疫苗的第三次注射”

@StanphylCap "Helping"
https://twitter.com/CNBC/statu...

@StanphylCap“帮助”
https://twitter.com/CNBC/statu...

@AriDavidPaul @wtogami @Noahpinion Not quite just carbon because there are other environmental impacts. But it's a good start.

@AriDavidPaul @wtogami @Noahpinion 不仅仅是碳，因为还有其他环境影响。但这是一个好的开始。

@seirl_ @juicedpotato @B_helpdesk @Noahpinion @wtogami Heat pumps aren't cost effective in temperate climates when the heating requirements are limited. Then again you wouldn't be mining much in lieu of heat in that climate either.

@seirl_ @juicedpotato @B_helpdesk @Noahpinion @wtogami 在加热要求有限的温带气候中，热泵不具有成本效益。再说一次，在那种气候下，你也不会开采太多来代替热量。

@CBadcock @ProfPCDoherty @certifiedwise @ConversationEDU She stated in public that after covid she was a lot more fatigued. That's not enough to tie to cause of death but is enough to question whether she actually fully recovered.

@CBadcock @ProfPCDoherty @certifiedwise @ConversationEDU 她公开表示，在新冠病毒之后，她更加疲惫。这不足以与死因联系起来，但足以质疑她是否真的完全康复了。

@FinchTH Most major insurance companies have a pathway to get the tests without needing to pay and get reimbursement, either at partner pharmacies or mail order service. However, it's not always easy to find or navigate.

@FinchTH 大多数主要保险公司都有一种途径来获得测试，而无需支付和获得报销，无论是在合作药房还是邮购服务。但是，查找或导航并不总是那么容易。

@TRyanGregory @itosettiMD_MBA @UCSF The sweet smell of right wing money.
BTW, how does Barry know that the masks were useless?

@TRyanGregory @itosettiMD_MBA @UCSF 右翼金钱的甜味。
顺便说一句，巴里怎么知道面具没用？

@michaeldweiss @Felix_Nuno How much does it weigh?

@michaeldweiss @Felix_Nuno 它有多重？

@lb_412 @FinnMacCool8 @sahilkapur @TheStalwart @FoxNews A small number of rich people go to the US for a few elite hospitals (NY Presbyterian, Cedar Sinai, etc.). That's not remotely representative of US healthcare overall.

@lb_412 @FinnMacCool8 @sahilkapur @TheStalwart @FoxNews 少数有钱人去美国为几家精英医院（NY Presbyterian、Cedar Sinai 等）。这并不能完全代表美国的医疗保健。

@lb_412 @FinnMacCool8 @sahilkapur @TheStalwart @FoxNews Minimum wages affect large parts of the lower end of the wage scale. It's not limited to people literally making the minimum.

@lb_412 @FinnMacCool8 @sahilkapur @TheStalwart @FoxNews 最低工资会影响工资规模的大部分低端。它不仅限于人们真正做到最低限度。

@sahilkapur @FoxNews Biggest turning point was 12-16. What happened during that time period?

@sahilkapur @FoxNews 最大的转折点是 12-16。那段时间发生了什么？

@jbview @PeterHLemieux The thermostatic effect is mostly a function of the electoral cycle. You won't see it on decades long timescales.

@jbview @PeterHLemieux 恒温效应主要是选举周期的函数。你不会在几十年的时间尺度上看到它。

@TuurDemeester @hodlportugal @adam3us I'm almost certain this is out of context. It's comparing proof of work to just nodes, not comparing it to proof of stake (which has its own issues but sybil nodes isn't one of them).

@TuurDemeester @hodlportugal @adam3us 我几乎可以肯定这是断章取义的。它将工作证明与节点进行比较，而不是将其与权益证明进行比较（这有其自身的问题，但女巫节点不是其中之一）。

@least_recent @yangxifan @sherberrtttt It's probably not transmission from the phone, pillowcases, etc. that motivates it, it's just adding another way to detect if the owner is infected without relying solely on the nasal swab or saliva.

@least_recent @yangxifan @sherberrtttt 激发它的可能不是来自手机、枕套等的传播，它只是增加了另一种方法来检测主人是否被感染，而不仅仅依赖于鼻拭子或唾液。