@MichaelSFuhrer @GYamey @nikkharris @CT_Bergstrom @TIME @alexandraphelan @Boghuma Yes it is possible that a new variant in three months would be a "new pandemic" (as with pandemic influenza). However, I think most common sense would reject that, thus should reject declaring anything to be over.

@MichaelSFuhrer @GYamey @nikkharris @CT_Bergstrom @TIME @alexandraphelan @Boghuma 是的，三个月内的新变种可能会成为“新的大流行”（与大流行性流感一样）。但是，我认为大多数常识都会拒绝这一点，因此应该拒绝宣布任何事情都结束了。

@GYamey @MichaelSFuhrer @nikkharris @CT_Bergstrom @TIME @alexandraphelan @Boghuma They're all basically guessing. How is there possibly certainty that a highly immune evasive and highly pathogenic variant won't emerge in, say, three months?
Only with the test of time can anyone be truly said to be post- anything. Until then, the correct phrasing is "may be".

@GYamey @MichaelSFuhrer @nikkharris @CT_Bergstrom @TIME @alexandraphelan @Boghuma 他们基本上都是在猜测。怎么可能确定在三个月内不会出现高度免疫回避和高致病性变异？
只有经过时间的考验，才能真正称得上是后期。在那之前，正确的措辞是“可能是”。

@GYamey @MichaelSFuhrer @nikkharris @CT_Bergstrom @TIME It can only be determined in hindsight. Any attempt to declare an end is inherently a "Mission Accomplished" moment.

@GYamey @MichaelSFuhrer @nikkharris @CT_Bergstrom @TIME 只能事后才能确定。任何宣布结束的尝试本质上都是“任务完成”的时刻。

@DaveStroup @ZoeMcLaren They do not.

@DaveStroup @ZoeMcLaren 他们没有。

@fitterhappierAJ It might have been intricate but it was bad advice that ignored repeated risks.

@fitterhappierAJ 这可能很复杂，但这是一个忽略重复风险的坏建议。

@kallmemeg @KarenCutter4 @glbabbington When there are *more* excess deaths in the 90 day period after covid than in other time periods (say, for illustration, 90 days before covid), that's not just incidental.
That seems be what is being claimed here, but perhaps I misunderstood.

@kallmemeg @KarenCutter4 @glbabbington 当新冠病毒后 90 天的死亡人数比其他时间段（例如，新冠病毒前 90 天）的死亡人数*多*多时，这不仅仅是偶然的。
这似乎是这里所说的，但也许我误解了。

@PeterHotez @AnjKhem @YahooNews @YahooFinance "than earlier in the pandemic"
His own words.

@PeterHotez @AnjKhem @YahooNews @YahooFinance “比大流行早期”
他自己的话。

@EtanG33557750 @BallouxFrancois Significant questions raised about that study
https://www.medicalnewstoday.c...

@EtanG33557750 @BallouxFrancois 关于该研究提出的重要问题
https://www.medicalnewstoday.c...

@AltMiddlePeds Something can't be "over" based on observations a limited period of time. The word is inherently forward looking.

@AltMiddlePeds 根据在有限时间内的观察，某些事情不能“结束”。这个词本质上是前瞻性的。

@SusannahUnion @MeerkatEyes @Mssarahmssarah The gray line is deaths. Most have been trending up, and the national total has been trending up.

@SusannahUnion @MeerkatEyes @Mssarahmssarah 灰线是死亡。大多数呈上升趋势，全国总量呈上升趋势。

@SusannahUnion @MeerkatEyes @Mssarahmssarah NY Times doesn't show deaths trending down

@SusannahUnion @MeerkatEyes @Mssarahmssarah 纽约时报没有显示死亡人数呈下降趋势

@DNBurner @bearlymade_it @bengrossbg @Noahpinion That probably means mask-incompatible things like drinks/meals.

@DNBurner @bearlymade_it @bengrossbg @Noahpinion 这可能意味着面罩不兼容的东西，比如饮料/餐点。

RT: @bearlymade_it @bengrossbg @Noahpinion The original tweet says avoiding indoor socialization entirely for the rest of her life

RT：@bearlymade_it @bengrossbg @Noahpinion 最初的推文说，在她的余生中完全避免室内社交

@SusannahUnion @MeerkatEyes @Mssarahmssarah 7 day average per NY Times is 516. Some days the number is higher, for example September 15 it was 760. Obviously some days lower.
These are newly reported deaths. Statistics using date of date will show lower numbers for recent days because many death reports are delayed.

@SusannahUnion @MeerkatEyes @Mssarahmssarah 7 天平均每纽约时报是 516。有些日子这个数字更高，例如 9 月 15 日是 760。显然有些日子更低。
这些是新报告的死亡人数。由于许多死亡报告被延迟，使用日期的统计数据将显示最近几天的较低数字。

@tjsmcmlxii @wsbgnl @nohomelikeplace Not growing. In five months of polling only in one month did it increase at all.

@tjsmcmlxii @wsbgnl @nohomelikeplace 没有增长。在五个月的民意调查中，仅在一个月内它就完全增加了。

@moonyends @wsbgnl @NotPotBol "Popular" meaning people disagree with it two to one?

@moonyends @wsbgnl @NotPotBol “流行”的意思是人们对它二比一的不同意？

@MdFacep @EricTopol @POTUS Even setting aside the massive undercount, cherry picking one day with unusually low reporting is absurdly disingenuous. You should delete this.

@MdFacep @EricTopol @POTUS 即使撇开大量的低估，在报告异常低的情况下采摘一天也是荒谬的不诚实。你应该删除这个。

@fmokren @whatsgoingon00 @ArditiMd @EricTopol @POTUS The third largest cause of death isn't the victory declaration you think it is.

@fmokren @whatsgoingon00 @ArditiMd @EricTopol @POTUS 第三大死因不是你认为的胜利宣言。

@wsbgnl https://t.co/QwenF4aIKS

@wsbgnl https://t.co/QwenF4aIKS

@maggiehagan @luckytran He doesn't. Major new policy initiatives or funding would undermine his messaging of it being over.

@maggiehagan @luckytran 他没有。重大的新政策举措或资金将破坏他关于它已经结束的信息。