@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait That was 100% not what was said from the beginning, you are simply wrong. Here is an article from early 2021 which is very clear what was being said.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 这 100% 不是从一开始就说的，你完全错了。这是 2021 年初的一篇文章，内容非常清楚。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@toadmeister Stop posting antivax nonsense. I look at the paper. Protection from recovery alone was 91% down to 63% after 4 months. With added vaccination, it was 94%->79%. Vaccination didn't destroy protection from recovery, it increased it!

@toadmeister 停止发布 antivax 废话。我看着纸。 4 个月后，仅对恢复的保护就从 91% 下降到 63%。加上疫苗接种后，它是 94%-

@erroltps @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait You should change doctors.*
* There might be some rare circumstances where someone is medically disqualified. But most likely your doctor is unqualified. Even more likely, you are just lying and this goes on the long list of things people say on social media that didn't happen.

@erroltps @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 你应该换医生。*
* 可能存在一些罕见的情况，即某人在医学上被取消资格。但很可能你的医生不合格。更有可能的是，你只是在撒谎，而这在人们在社交媒体上说的一长串没有发生的事情上。

@Mr_Malakia @jmamaemu @benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait This is completely wrong. ARR and RRR are basically the same when the disease spreads so widely that almost everyone is exposed, which is what happened. You're the one who is being misled by this antivax nonsense.

@Mr_Malakia @jmamaemu @benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 这完全错了。当疾病传播如此广泛以至于几乎每个人都暴露时，ARR和RRR基本相同，这就是发生的事情。你是被这种反病毒废话误导的人。

@Mr_Malakia @benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Bill Gates is not relevant here. At all. He's not an expert, not a public official. Basically just a self-promoter.

@Mr_Malakia @benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Bill Gates 在这里不相关。完全没有。他不是专家，也不是公职人员。基本上只是一个自我推销员。

@TravAlvord @djchicus @SobkowiczC @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Exactly all of these people defending DeSantis are actually just antivaxers who claim they don't work much at all (or at all), which is complete bullshit. DeSantis is courting the antivaxer vote.

@TravAlvord @djchicus @SobkowiczC @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 正是所有这些为 DeSantis 辩护的人实际上只是声称他们根本不工作（或根本不工作）的反吸血鬼，这完全是胡说八道。德桑蒂斯正在争取反吸毒者的投票。

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait It's impossible to interpret these montages. They were often reporting on new data at different times and sometimes misleadingly edited. e.g, another one I watched in this thread cut off the last three words when one of those said "highly effective against severe disease". Gross.

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 无法解释这些蒙太奇。他们经常在不同时间报告新数据，有时还会进行误导性编辑。例如，当其中一个说“对严重疾病非常有效”时，我在此线程中看到的另一个切断了最后三个词。总的。

@TrumpUndead @NJoIdaR @jonathanchait There is a range of severity, some people have no symptoms or virtually no symptoms, some die. This is true of flu as well. Comparatively, covid has been 10-20x more likely to kill adults at every age, and generally speaking the severity is higher, but individual experiences vary

@TrumpUndead @NJoIdaR @jonathanchait 有一系列严重程度，有些人没有症状或几乎没有症状，有些人死亡。流感也是如此。相比之下，covid 在每个年龄段杀死成年人的可能性要高出 10-20 倍，而且一般来说严重程度更高，但个人经历各不相同

@erroltps @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Yeah, well, don't listen to politicians, especially about science and medicine. I think you already knew that, but you like to forget it when convenient.

@erroltps @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 是的，好吧，不要听政客的话，尤其是关于科学和医学的。我想你已经知道了，但你喜欢在方便的时候忘记它。

@MasonMarauder @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Not true. The virus changed, which was the biggest factor. Delta began to infect and transmit from vaccinated people at a high rate which never happened before. That was the primary cause of big surge in summer 2021 after months of low transmission post vax.

@MasonMarauder @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不正确。病毒发生了变化，这是最大的因素。三角洲开始以前所未有的高比率感染和传播接种疫苗的人。这是在 vax 后数月的低传播率之后，2021 年夏季大幅上涨的主要原因。

@MichaelM_697 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait It wasn't "predicted" to stop transmission.

@MichaelM_697 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 并没有“预测到”停止传输。

@MichaelM_697 @boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait They were tested to stop symptomatic disease which they did, and secondarily stop hospitalization and death, which they also did. After having evidence of that it would not have been reasonable to wait more moths or years for testing of transmission. That would have killed many.

@MichaelM_697 @boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 他们接受了测试以阻止他们所做的症状性疾病，其次是停止住院和死亡，他们也这样做了。在获得证据之后，等待更多的飞蛾或数年进行传输测试是不合理的。那会杀死很多人。

@ShortedTriac @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Good for you. Something like 90% of the world did get it. The immune system didn't stop it.

@ShortedTriac @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 对你有好处。世界上 90% 的人确实得到了它。免疫系统并没有阻止它。

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Bill Gates? Come on.

@RTawneyJr @Jeffislouie @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 比尔盖茨？来吧。

@jdembrunop @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait None of this is true.

@jdembrunop @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 这些都不是真的。

@Faye44506836 @BertThere @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait I watched some of it, and I saw a lot of clips of saying "high effective" which remains true to this day, and one saying 94-95% specifically against mild and moderate disease which is no longer true but was at the time.

@Faye44506836 @BertThere @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 我看了一些，我看到很多说“高效”的片段，直到今天仍然如此，还有一个说 94-95% 专门针对轻度和中度疾病不再是真实的，但在当时是真实的。

@mylemondrop @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Nobody claimed 100% effective in contracting or spreading. There were some sloppy words by public spokespeople about "you're not going to get covid" but no study ever gave the number 100% for contracting or spreading. It didn't happen.

@mylemondrop @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 没有人声称在收缩或传播方面 100% 有效。公众发言人有一些关于“你不会感染新冠病毒”的草率言论，但没有研究给出 100% 的感染或传播数字。它没有发生。

@ScottB99329729 @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait There are multiple motivations for boosters but the main one was that the original schedule just wasn't very good. It was the first thing tried that worked at all, but without going through multiple iterations. It probably should have always been a 3 dose series.

@ScottB99329729 @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 助推器有多种动机，但主要的动机是最初的时间表不是很好。这是第一个尝试的东西，它完全有效，但没有经过多次迭代。它可能应该一直是一个 3 剂量系列。

@ScottB99329729 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait No it didn't. England was reporting 80-90% up until Delta even with waning.

@ScottB99329729 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不，它没有。直到三角洲，英格兰报告了 80-90% 的增长，即使在减弱。