@SueSueCurious @LazarusLong13 He's bragging about "hundreds" of doctors and nurses.

@Suesue@LazarusLong13他在吹嘘“数百”名医生和护士。

@MaggieEThornton Ask Biden
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@maggieethornton ask biden
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@StephMeisner2 @TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder CDC guidance for schools still calls for 10 days of isolation, I think.

@我认为，疾病预防控制中心对学校的指导仍然要求隔离10天。

@FinchTH "Confirmed COVID-19" means symptoms then confirmed with a positive test. Those without symptoms weren't generally tested, at least not for the primary endpoint. I think some other tests might have been done incidentally.

@FinchTH“确认的新冠病毒-19”指随后通过阳性试验确认的症状。没有症状的患者通常没有进行测试，至少没有进行主要终点测试。我想其他一些测试可能是顺便做的。

@pickettjessica @walidgellad I'm not even commenting on the numbers, just that "vaccines" don't do anything at all, only vaccinations, and few or no vaccinations in those groups.

@pickettjessica@walidgellad我甚至没有对数字发表评论，只是“疫苗”根本不起任何作用，只是疫苗接种，这些群体中很少或根本没有疫苗接种。

@thecamizzx @EpiEllie Short term? Uh, no. The message on protecting schools has been the same for over a year, and enormous unprecedented funding ($1M/school) has been available for almost a year. If it wasn't done, don't blame the messenger, blame the people who didn't do it!

@EpiEllie短期内会有什么变化？呃，不。关于保护学校的信息已经有一年多了，而且史无前例的巨额资金（100万美元/所学校）已经提供了将近一年。如果没有做到，不要责怪信使，责怪那些没有做到的人！

@EpiEllie Testing. You forgot testing.
If you don't measure something, you can't know how well you are protecting it.

@EpiEllie测试。你忘了测试。
如果你不测量某个东西，你就不知道你保护它的效果有多好。

@pickettjessica @walidgellad How does it reduce the risk when mass infecting kids under 5 or the great majority of older kids who aren't vaccinated?

@pickettjessica@walidgellad当大规模感染5岁以下儿童或绝大多数未接种疫苗的年长儿童时，它如何降低风险？

@alexmeshkin It was AT the start, but then it was time to declare the 100 days of masking over and celebrate independence from the virus, so the message switched to vaccinated people don't get infected, don't transmit, and don't get sick.

@阿列克斯梅斯金：这是一开始，但后来是时候宣布100天的掩蔽期结束了，庆祝从病毒中独立出来，所以信息转向接种疫苗的人不会感染、不会传播，也不会生病。

@SuzieSm28138769 @alexmeshkin It was, that's why masks and other transmission mitigations were kept in place. There was then a pivot to claiming that vaccines alone were enough, masks could be cut with scissors or burned, and it was time declare independence from the virus.

@SuzieSm28138769@alexmeshkin确实如此，这就是为什么口罩和其他传播缓解措施一直存在的原因。当时有一个支点，声称疫苗本身就足够了，口罩可以用剪刀剪断或烧掉，现在是宣布独立于病毒的时候了。

@happyhexer @POTUS @CDCDirector @US_FDA Zientz is doing exactly what Biden wants him to do, why would he fire him?

@Happyhever@POTUS@cdcedirector@US_FDA Zientz正在做拜登希望他做的事情，他为什么要解雇他？

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt It accurately fits real world case trajectories. Assuming transmission happens at home (which doesn't even make the slightest logical sense) does not. https://t.co/vyPYk0MX0g

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt它精确地符合现实世界的案例轨迹。假设传播发生在家里（这甚至没有一点逻辑意义）不会发生。https://t.co/vyPYk0MX0g

@FinchTH Symptomatic infection.

@发现症状性感染。

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt https://www.restaurantbusiness...

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardthttps://www.restaurantbusiness...

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt False. Someone always brings it into the home, generally from a school, workplace, bar, or restaurant (may be both).

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt假。有人总是把它带到家里，通常是从学校、工作场所、酒吧或餐馆（可能两者都有）。

@Emgee_7 @politicsNdogs @fitterhappierAJ Agree with that. It's a good monitor. Fortunately yours remains low but you never know when it might not.

@Emgee_7@politicsNdogs@fitterhappierAJ同意这一点。这是个好显示器。幸运的是，你的价格仍然很低，但你永远不知道什么时候可能不会。

@tarahaelle @vzlui Asymptomatic OR improving

@tarahaelle@vzlui无症状或好转

@MullingMueller @AshaRangappa_ It's not actually a win if you cheat, just an outcome.

@MullingMueller@AshaRangappa_uu如果你作弊，那实际上不是一场胜利，只是一个结果。

@mattyglesias In practice, many who do make binding rules model them after CDC guidance. Some other people might sometimes follow them even if not binding. That's what it means. You're welcome.

@mattyglesias在实践中，许多制定约束性规则的人在CDC指导下对其进行建模。有些人有时可能会跟随他们，即使没有约束力。这就是它的意思。不客气。

@NuritBaytch That doesn't explain the wording "and wants to test" so it isn't the only reason. They clearly want to make it optional even if available.

@NuritBaytch没有解释“并且想要测试”的措辞，所以这不是唯一的原因。他们显然想让它成为可选的，即使是可用的。