@WhiteHouse @POTUS Why are you quoting "doses" rather than courses?

@WhiteHouse@POTUS为什么引用“剂量”而不是课程？

@MedHatDentist @WesPegden @walidgellad Difference is over a season vs at one time. Season is say 100 days, course of infection is 10 days (made up numbers for easy estimation) = 4% at one time.

@Medhatdent@WesPegden@walidgellad的差异是一个赛季对一个时期。季节是100天，感染过程是10天（为便于估计而编造的数字）=4%。

@kittensnotkids @Reuters Tell her not me.

@kittensnotkids@Reuters告诉她不要告诉我。

@TKevin6710 @Incindery1 @DrLeanaWen In England where they are actually able to collect data, 2/3 to 3/4 of hospitalized covid patients are there primarily for covid and in some of the other cases it is a contributing factor.

@TKevin6710@Incindery1@DrLeanaWen在英国，他们实际上能够收集数据，2/3到3/4的住院新冠病毒患者主要是因为新冠病毒，在其他一些病例中，这是一个促成因素。

@DrHarryThomas Probably more likely to volunteer to get tested with a reason to believe may be infected. Right now it is hard to get tests.

@DrHarryThomas可能更愿意自愿接受检测，并有理由相信可能受到感染。现在很难进行测试。

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt Here's another one that is similar, doors opened briefly, transmission from one room to another.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt这是另一个类似的，门短暂打开，从一个房间传输到另一个房间。
https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt You can find the original report easily, regardless of who posted it to twitter. I believe some of them (maybe not the outdoor cafe, probably indoor fleeting contact) was sequenced and confirmed, and seen on video just walking by each other (not coughing).

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt无论是谁在推特上发布的，你都可以轻松找到原始报告。我相信他们中的一些人（可能不是室外咖啡馆，可能是室内短暂的接触）是被测序和确认的，并且在视频中看到了他们只是相互走动（不是咳嗽）。

@juli_bg_bs 30% of the country is not positive. It's more like a percent or two.

@全国30%的人口是不乐观的。更像是百分之一或百分之二。

@LYMALJO @odessit @Reuters There is a large space between mild/inconsequential and hospitalized.

@LYMALJO@Odesit@Reuters轻度/无关紧要和住院之间有很大的距离。

@Dara_4democracy @Reuters How about children over five whose parents are antivaxers or just hesitant?

@Dara_4democracy@Reuters五岁以上的孩子，他们的父母是反吸血鬼或者只是犹豫不决，怎么样？

@ashishkjha @doritmi Considering that isolation is to protect OTHERS, how do we ensure that people do wear that high quality mask in order to protect others in workplaces and essential services?
Or we just suggest it, wash our hands of any further responsibility for public safety, and call it a day?

@ashishkjha@doritmi考虑到隔离是为了保护他人，我们如何确保人们佩戴高质量的口罩，以便在工作场所和基本服务中保护他人？
或者我们只是建议，不要再为公共安全承担任何责任，今天就到此为止？

@radioramin @Reuters It was her idea to throw the number out there, so apparently she think 200m vaxed, 130m unvaxed means something. I'm not sure what.

@radioramin@Reuters把这个数字公布出来是她的主意，所以她显然认为2亿VAX，1.3亿未VAX意味着什么。我不知道是什么。

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt A lot of transmissions in unstructured settings are hard to document. That was before genomic sequencing was available or used to establish specific transmission links (even now, uncommon), and the original virus in 2020 was less transmissible too.

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt非结构化环境中的许多传输很难记录。那是在基因组测序可用或用于建立特定传播联系之前（即使是现在，也不常见），而2020年的原始病毒传播性也较低。

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt At a restaurant (cafe), no less
https://twitter.com/DrEricDing...

@Finnegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt在一家餐厅（咖啡馆），同样如此
https://twitter.com/DrEricDing...

@Reuters So let's see...checks calculator....that's 130 million not vaccinated.

@路透社，让我们看看。。。检查计算器。。。。那就是1.3亿人没有接种疫苗。

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt A virus doesn't have a timer, and 30% of the people mentioned were just other customers at the restaurant. Fleeting transmission in a few seconds, even outdoors, has been documented. Sitting in a restaurant for enough time for a meal is plenty.

@Finnegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt病毒没有计时器，提到的人中有30%只是餐厅的其他顾客。在几秒钟内，即使是在户外，也有短暂的传播记录。在餐馆里坐上足够的时间吃饭就足够了。

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt Here's one more. Google is your friend. They're easy to find.
https://projectprotech.ca/comm...

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt还有一个。谷歌是你的朋友。它们很容易找到。
https://projectprotech.ca/comm...

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt Here's an easy one to find, only a few weeks ago.
https://www.coronaheadsup.com/...

@Finnegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt这是一个很容易找到的，就在几周前。
https://www.coronaheadsup.com/...

@Finnegenegen @ashishkjha @DLeonhardt There are countless case reports of these suprespreader events. I'm not going to do your research for you, assuming you are actually interested.
Hospitalizations and deaths don't depend on where someone is infected, or where the person who infected them was.

@Finnegenegen@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt有无数关于这些超级传播者事件的案例报告。假设你真的感兴趣，我不会为你做研究。
住院和死亡并不取决于某人在哪里被感染，也不取决于感染者在哪里。

@SueSueCurious @LazarusLong13 There are a million doctors and five million nurses in the US. His "hundreds" should make whole lot of no difference whatsoever.

@Suesue@LazarusLong13美国有一百万名医生和五百万名护士。他的“百人”应该不会有什么不同。