@ashishkjha @DLeonhardt Maybe push to close indoor restaurants and bars to reduce the intensity of rampant community spread and facilitate safe schools. What were the CDC community case-rate thresholds for safe schools before that was sent into the memory hole?

@ashishkjha@DLeonhardt可能会推动关闭室内餐厅和酒吧，以减少猖獗的社区传播的强度，并促进安全的学校。在安全学校被送入记忆洞之前，CDC社区病例率阈值是多少？

@CivisRomanvsSum @mattyglesias Fully asymptomatic isn't really that common, most get symptoms (99% with Omicron in Norway report, 75% over entire pandemic according to CDC), and if asymptomatic, probably no symptoms YET, and often highly contagious.

@CivisRomanvsSum@mattyglesias完全无症状并不常见，大多数人都会出现症状（挪威的奥米克罗报告中有99%的人出现症状，根据疾病预防控制中心的数据，整个大流行期间有75%的人出现症状），如果没有症状，可能还没有症状，而且通常具有高度传染性。

@CivisRomanvsSum @mattyglesias A day or two before symptoms is likely close to peak contagion, if not peak.

@在症状出现前一两天，CivisRomanvsSum@mattyglesias可能接近传染高峰，如果不是高峰的话。

@integritas17 @hjelle_brian @lostinliminal If you want to put anything over an N95 make sure it is a solid cup-style N95. You don't want to deform the folded N95s because that can disrupt fit.

@integritas17@hjelle_brian@lostinliminal如果您想在N95上放置任何东西，请确保它是实心杯型N95。您不希望使折叠的N95变形，因为这会破坏贴合感。

@alexmeshkin There are multiple problems. Definitely the spread of the virus is the root cause. But also a system that responds to congestion by delaying results, degrading their utility. Congestion problems occur in all sorts of systems, usually a solution is building in back pressure.

@阿列克斯金：有很多问题。毫无疑问，病毒的传播是根本原因。但同时也是一个通过延迟结果来应对拥塞的系统，降低了它们的效用。拥塞问题发生在各种系统中，通常解决方案是建立在背压中。

@alexmeshkin I'm sure you agree that test results being returned after 96 hours is a real problem. Throwing up one's hands and saying "that's how it works" doesn't seem ideal.

@阿列克斯梅斯金：我肯定你同意96小时后返回测试结果是一个真正的问题。举手说“这就是它的工作原理”似乎并不理想。

@alexmeshkin I understand the stress of being in the trenches and feeling of being criticized but it wasn't intended that way at all, just an observation.

@我理解身处战壕的压力和被批评的感觉，但这根本不是故意的，只是一种观察。

@WinfieldSmart @tmprowell @carlquintanilla Even setting aside that this is comparing estimate deaths for everything other than covid to confirmed covid deaths (undercounted by multiples), this chart is very old and the covid numbers are much higher now.

@WinfieldSmart@tmprowell@carlquintanilla即使撇开这是将除新冠病毒以外的所有病毒的估计死亡与确认的新冠病毒死亡进行比较（倍数计算不足），这张图表也非常古老，新冠病毒的数字现在要高得多。

@tmprowell Pandering doesn't require coherent logic.

@tmprowell迎合不需要连贯的逻辑。

@alexmeshkin Yes, I do understand that, and that is exactly the broken system. It needs more coordination. Not necessarily a lot more. Quotas on how many samples can be submitted would be sufficient.

@阿列克斯金：是的，我明白这一点，而这正是破碎的系统。它需要更多的协调。不一定更多。可以提交多少样本的配额就足够了。

@alexmeshkin Broken system. Shouldn't be collecting more samples than can be processed in 24-48h.

@阿列克斯金破坏了系统。采集的样本不应超过24-48小时内可以处理的数量。

@myrabatchelder Sick pay.

@迈拉巴奇尔德病假工资。

@swd2 @kaitlancollins It's actually going to make matters worse.

@swd2@kaitlancollins实际上会让事情变得更糟。

@politicsNdogs @Emgee_7 @fitterhappierAJ CO2 tells you ventilation (outside air) not filtration. The filtration is a supplement.

@政治犬@Emgee_7@fitterhappierAJ二氧化碳告诉你通风（室外空气）而不是过滤。过滤是一种补充。

@politicsNdogs @fitterhappierAJ Switch to N95 or an elastomeric if you can. Sturdier and more secure fit than KF94 for something you're wearing all day in a high risk environment.

@politicsNdogs@fitterhappierAJ切换到N95或弹性体（如果可以）。与KF94相比，KF94更坚固、更安全，适合在高风险环境中全天穿着。

@0detteroulette @LeiaRx @emilyakopp @CDCgov @WhiteHouse @POTUS @JoeBiden @PressSec @VP This is what I see on the CDC web site https://t.co/kKfPnpGkCH

@0detteroulete@LeiaRx@emilyakopp@CDCgov@WhiteHouse@POTUS@JoeBiden@PressSec@VP这是我在疾病控制中心网站上看到的https://t.co/kKfPnpGkCH

@DailyJLee @_Eric_Reinhart @wsbgnl Interesting and seems like it could be modeled reasonably well.

@DailyJLee@_Eric_Reinhart@wsbgnl很有趣，似乎可以很好地建模。

@JReq13 @wsbgnl At least some of the funding needs to go directly to the people and businesses impacted.

@JReq13@wsbgnl至少部分资金需要直接流向受影响的人员和企业。

@_Eric_Reinhart @wsbgnl Agree about sustained measures of course. "Living with the virus" = ADAPTING to living with the virus. Unfortunately most advocates of LWTV think it means pretend to be in 2019.

@_Eric_Reinhart@wsbgnl当然同意持续措施。“与病毒共存”=适应与病毒共存。不幸的是，LWTV的大多数支持者认为这意味着在2019年假装是。

@JReq13 @wsbgnl Because it needs funding. Funding comes from the federal government for the most part. Only a few very wealthy states can do anything meaningful on funding and even that is limited.

@JReq13@wsbgnl，因为它需要资金。资金大部分来自联邦政府。只有少数几个非常富裕的州可以在资金上做任何有意义的事情，即使这样也很有限。