@barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @big_guerilla @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk It was, perhaps not clearly. CDC said to continue mask mandates, quarantines, etc. Dec to May. WHO never said to drop measures. Fauci and several commentators (Gottlieb being one, probably others) said in 2020 that immunity would likely not last.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/0...

@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@big_游击队@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk，也许不太清楚。疾控中心表示将在12月至5月期间继续实施口罩要求、隔离等措施。从来没说过要放弃措施。Fauci和几位评论员（Gottlieb就是其中之一，可能还有其他人）在2020年表示，免疫可能不会持续。
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/0...

@big_guerilla @barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk All sorts of extreme views on twitter, some may be sincere, some may be troll or bots, who knows. Can't account for that in any case.

@big_游击队@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk twitter上有各种极端观点，有些可能是真诚的，有些可能是巨魔或机器人，谁知道呢。无论如何都不能解释。

@barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @big_guerilla @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk Sincere and realistic experience and views. Thank you for sharing.

@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@big_游击队@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk真诚而现实的经验和观点。谢谢分享。

@big_guerilla @barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk https://twitter.com/WHO/status...

@大游击队@bartels2@ChristosArgyrop@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODeskhttps://twitter.com/WHO/status...

@big_guerilla @barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk No one is suggesting locking in houses, which many places never happened and most places hasn't been the case in 1-2 years.
https://twitter.com/WHO/status...

@大游击队@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk没有人建议把房子锁起来，这在很多地方从未发生过，大多数地方在1-2年内都没有发生过。
https://twitter.com/WHO/status...

@barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @big_guerilla @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk At some point in dealing with vaccine hesitancy, the nonsensical idea of vaccines as an "incentive" to drop everything else emerged. But, again, it never made sense and still doesn't.

@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@big_游击队@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk在处理疫苗犹豫不决的问题时，出现了一个荒谬的想法，即疫苗是放弃一切的“诱因”。但是，再一次，它从来没有意义，现在仍然没有。

@barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @big_guerilla @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk This wasn't, BTW, the original message which was take vaccine to reduce disease but continue other measures. Leaders were warned that vaccines would likely only confer temporary immunity and would weaken and fail to variants with ongoing transmission.

@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@big_游击队@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk顺便说一句，这不是最初的信息，即采取疫苗来减少疾病，但继续采取其他措施。领导人被警告说，疫苗可能只会带来暂时的免疫力，并会削弱和阻止正在传播的变种。

@barttels2 @ChristosArgyrop @big_guerilla @fitterhappierAJ @james1chas3 @BNODesk If you paid attention to some (albeit many, certainly too many) of the experts who were pushing nonsensical 'offramp' messages. It never made sense and still doesn't.

@barttels2@ChristosArgyrop@big_guerrla@fitterhappierAJ@james1chas3@BNODesk，如果你注意到一些（尽管很多，当然也太多）正在推动荒谬的“下线”信息的专家的话。它从来没有意义，现在仍然没有意义。

@DrLeanaWen @shefalil Somehow, you seem intent on ignoring the inconvenient fact that these vaccines are not very effective in stopping infection, mild to moderate illness, and transmission. Masks and vaccines are not alternatives in any logical sense, they do different things.

@DrLeanaWen@shefalil不知何故，你似乎有意忽视一个令人不安的事实，即这些疫苗在阻止感染、轻中度疾病和传播方面不是非常有效。口罩和疫苗在任何逻辑意义上都不是替代品，它们的作用不同。

@DrLeanaWen @shefalil This is exactly a 'fear of infection' strategy. You're removing measures which help stop school outbreaks, leaving kids whose parents decide against vaccination poorly protected, and even vaccinated kids will get sick and miss school.

@DrLeanaWen@shefalil这正是一种“害怕感染”的策略。你正在取消有助于阻止学校疫情爆发的措施，让那些父母决定不接种疫苗的孩子得不到很好的保护，甚至连接种疫苗的孩子也会生病缺课。

@GraceDa06 @DrLeanaWen @AndrewMakeTweet @j_g_allen Likewise vaccine mandates:
"Just over half of respondents said they supported employers requiring COVID-19 vaccines or weekly testing, while 39% said they opposed such mandates"

@GraceDa06@DrLeanaWen@andrewmakeweet@j_g_allen：
“超过半数的2019冠状病毒疾病患者表示，他们支持雇主需要COVID-19疫苗或每周检测，而39%的受访者表示反对这种授权。”

@GraceDa06 @DrLeanaWen @AndrewMakeTweet @j_g_allen As usual the headline is terrible. Texans are "split" perhaps in some sense, but not even remotely evenly:
"About 57% of respondents said they support local governments requiring people to wear masks or face coverings in most public places, while 35% opposed such rules."

@GraceDa06@DrLeanaWen@andrewmakeweet@j_g_allen一如既往，标题很糟糕。德克萨斯人在某种意义上可能是“分裂”的，但甚至不是一分为二的：
“大约57%的受访者表示，他们支持地方政府要求人们在大多数公共场所佩戴口罩或口罩，而35%的人反对这样的规定。”

@wsbgnl "Don't care" isn't that interesting. What is interesting is 45% being more likely to support officials in favor of mask mandate while 32% said less likely to support or definitely would not support.

@wsbgnl“不在乎”没那么有趣。有趣的是，45%的人更可能支持官员支持口罩授权，而32%的人表示不太可能支持或肯定不会支持。

@snorman1776 @mpp75214 @No3spera @BNODesk Life expectancy at age 103 is about 2 years. So a good part of the reasons for death is likely to be some overlapping combination of age-related ailments, illnesses and susceptibility to illnesses included.
Realistically though, 103 is an outlier.

@snorman1776@mpp75214@No3spera@BNODesk 103岁时的预期寿命约为2年。因此，死亡的大部分原因可能是与年龄相关的疾病、疾病和对疾病的易感性的重叠组合。
但实际上，103是一个异常值。

@mpp75214 @snorman1776 @No3spera @BNODesk If you don't like attributing 1 million deaths to covid, you could instead characterize it as 10 million years of life lost to covid (both approx). That's more "accurate" in a sense, but mostly the same thing.

@mpp75214@snorman1776@No3spera@BNODesk如果你不喜欢将100万人的死亡归因于新冠病毒，你可以将其描述为新冠病毒导致的1000万年生命损失（两者都大约）。这在某种意义上更“准确”，但基本上是一样的。

@mpp75214 @snorman1776 @No3spera @BNODesk This happens all the time. Someone in a car accident might survive if perfectly strong and healthy but not pull through if moderately frail. We still attribute the latter to the accident because it is the primary reason for dying at THAT time instead of some time later.

@mpp75214@snorman1776@No3spera@BNODesk这种情况经常发生。车祸中的人如果非常强壮和健康，可能会活下来，但如果身体适度虚弱，就无法渡过难关。我们仍然将后者归咎于事故，因为这是当时死亡的主要原因，而不是一段时间之后。

@mpp75214 @snorman1776 @No3spera @BNODesk That's always how cause of death is assigned.
In practice the median years lost of a covid death is about 10. So mostly its 90% covid 'caused' in the sense that someone in that situation has maybe a 10% chance of dying that year, which got promoted to 100%.

@mpp75214@snorman1776@No3spera@BNODesk死亡原因总是这样分配的。
实际上，新冠病毒死亡的平均损失年数约为10年。因此，90%的新冠病毒“造成”的主要原因是，处于这种情况的人当年可能有10%的死亡几率，而这一几率被提升到了100%。

@mpp75214 @snorman1776 @No3spera @BNODesk That's always how cause of death is assigned.
In practice the median years lost of a covid death is about 10. So mostly its 90% covid in the sense that someone in that situation has maybe a 10% chance of dying that year, which got promoted to 100%.

@mpp75214@snorman1776@No3spera@BNODesk死亡原因总是这样分配的。
实际上，新冠病毒死亡的平均损失年数约为10年。所以主要是90%的新冠病毒，也就是说，处于这种情况下的人当年可能有10%的死亡几率，而这一比例被提升到了100%。

@dog_envier @wsbgnl It smells of wagon circling and being a team player, not a credible candid opinion. Once you get to that point there really isn't any point in debating its accuracy.

@dog_envier@wsbgnl它闻起来像是一辆马车在兜圈子，是一名团队成员，而不是一个可信的坦率的意见。一旦你达到了这一点，就没有必要再讨论它的准确性了。

@wsbgnl Results? Who cares.

@wsbgnl结果如何？谁在乎呢。