@CarolinaGirl585 @joaquinlife Mask and vax mandates in some places. Some added requirements for international travel. That's pretty much it.

@CarolinaGirl585@joaquinlife面具和vax在某些地方是强制性的。一些人增加了国际旅行的要求。差不多就是这样。

@joaquinlife @mskathleenquinn Yup. The yo-yo is also what results in fatigue and frustration, rather than being honest about the need to develop sustainable strategies so people can get on with doing so.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@joaquinlife@msKathleenquin是的。溜溜球也是导致疲劳和沮丧的原因，而不是诚实地认为需要制定可持续的战略，这样人们才能继续这样做。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@whstancil WELL under 50%. 26% to be exact.

@whstancil低于50%。准确地说是26%。

@cloudydays1971 @wsbgnl Paying staffing firms high rates to fill those shortages doesn't sound like a winning MBA strategy to me. I get trying to convince the WH to drive down the rates, of course.

@cloudydays1971@wsbgnl向人力资源公司支付高额费用以填补这些短缺，在我看来，这并不是一个成功的MBA战略。当然，我正试图说服WH降低利率。

@wsbgnl Not black or white though, the former certainly increases the need and usage of the latter.

@虽然wsbgnl不是黑白的，但前者肯定会增加后者的需求和使用。

@wsbgnl There are some chronic understaffing situations (which is also real problem) but these are primarily surge requirements due to increased patient load or staff absences. It's normal and reasonable to use staffing firms to provide temporary workers who get moved around as needed.

@wsbgnl存在一些长期人手不足的情况（这也是一个真正的问题），但这些主要是由于患者工作量增加或员工缺勤而导致的需求激增。利用人力资源公司提供临时工是正常和合理的，他们可以根据需要四处走动。

@Dealiah3 @DanPriceSeattle Dirty secret is that good rx is also a parasitic middleman. They just happen to take somewhat less.

@Dealiah3@Danprice西雅图肮脏的秘密是，好的rx也是一个寄生的中间人。他们只是碰巧拿得少一点。

@vvalkyri @BoomSardonic @michaelmina_lab @YouAreLobbyLud @DailyJLee *unusually large

@vvalkyri@BoomSardonic@michaelmina_lab@YouAreLobbyLud@DailyJLee*异常大

@vvalkyri @BoomSardonic @michaelmina_lab @YouAreLobbyLud @DailyJLee And lockdown in NZ wasn't particularly "extended" either. It was locked down less than most western countries during 2020-2021, but as you say, able and willing to take a different approach.

@vvalkyri@BoomSardonic@michaelmina_lab@YouAreLobbyLud@DailyJLee，新西兰的封锁也没有特别“延长”。在2020年至2021年期间，它的封锁程度低于大多数西方国家，但正如你所说，它能够并愿意采取不同的做法。

@vvalkyri @BoomSardonic @michaelmina_lab @YouAreLobbyLud @DailyJLee Small population seems largely irrelevant. Size of economy is unremarkable relative to population. In fact, tourism sector is usually large, making this actually harder to do.
Agree measures vary in feasibility and difficulty.

@vvalkyri@BoomSardonic@michaelmina_lab@YouAreLobbyLud@DailyJLee小群体似乎在很大程度上无关紧要。相对于人口而言，经济规模并不显著。事实上，旅游业通常规模很大，这实际上很难做到。
一致认为各种措施的可行性和难度各不相同。

@chud_meridian Hong Kong is another one that comes to mind. Business and school closures now for Omicron. How workers are taken care of, I don't know.

“香港”是另一个想到的。Omicron现在停课。我不知道工人们是如何被照顾的。

@chud_meridian Some European countries had lockdowns, although its a bit unclear that was "in response to omicron" since delta was also in the mix at the time. Not sure what compensation was included, but I'd guess some (perhaps routine safety net).

@chud_meridian一些欧洲国家实施了封锁，尽管有点不清楚这是“对omicron的回应”，因为达美航空当时也在其中。我不确定赔偿金是多少，但我猜是一些（也许是常规的安全网）。

@ibrake4ants Wasn't there something in her profile about tweeting much less? That seems to be gone now.

@ibrake4ants在她的个人资料中没有少发推文吗？这似乎已经过去了。

@chud_meridian Pretty sure many countries did, including arguably the US. Various compensation schemes accompanied lockdowns in 2020.
However, willingness to do more of it waned quickly.

@chud_meridian很肯定很多国家都这么做了，包括美国。2020年，各种补偿计划伴随着封锁。
然而，做更多事情的意愿迅速减弱。

@wheatpond Important point that is not particularly apparent on that chart.

@wheatpond是一个重要的点，在该图表上并不是特别明显。

@vvalkyri @BoomSardonic @michaelmina_lab @YouAreLobbyLud @DailyJLee Not so much approval or disapproval, but more a question of accuracy. Welding doors seems not part of what China is doing for the past two years. I honestly don't know why people bring it up in this context. Seems irrelevant.

@vvalkyri@BoomSardonic@michaelmina_lab@YouAreLobbyLud@DailyJLee与其说是赞成或反对，不如说是准确性的问题。焊接门似乎不是中国过去两年所做的事情的一部分。我真的不知道为什么人们会在这种情况下提起它。似乎无关紧要。

@justlikekevin @andrewmhersh @RAFALOCA1 @zorinaq Well, a lot was known but it was also ignored. More was known later, fair, but that's not really a point in time distinction either.

@Justlikeevin@Andrewhersh@RAFALOCA1@zorinaq好吧，人们知道了很多，但也被忽略了。后来知道了更多，这很公平，但这也不是真正的时间点区别。

@VanGennepD @zorinaq This old thread and the linked github/paper is interesting, but doesn't consider recent data.
https://twitter.com/joe_sill/s...

这个老线程和链接GITHUB/纸很有趣，但是没有考虑最近的数据。
https://twitter.com/joe_sill/s...

@VanGennepD @zorinaq Is there necessarily one? I mean, there's probably one "most dominant" factor, but there may be several factors with very significant impact.

@VanGennepD@zorinaq一定有吗？我的意思是，可能有一个“最主要”的因素，但可能有几个因素具有非常显著的影响。

@zorinaq Immunity and death of vulnerables at the beginning could very well turn into an "inherent advantage" in this context.

@zorinaq免疫力和易受伤害者的死亡在一开始很可能会成为这种情况下的“固有优势”。