Aeon 的最新消息

@mpp75214 @snorman1776 @No3spera @BNODesk Some, not many. Excess deaths align both in total and in terms of contours of places and time with covid deaths, and are mostly of causes that align with covid (pneumonia, organ failure, etc.), not random things like car accidents.

@mpp75214@snorman1776@No3spera@BNODesk一些,不是很多。过量死亡与新冠病毒死亡在总体上、地点和时间上都是一致的,并且主要是与新冠病毒(肺炎、器官衰竭等)一致的原因,而不是像车祸这样的随机事件。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@snorman1776 @No3spera @mpp75214 @BNODesk A lot of covid deaths are not in hospitals, even the confirmed ones included in official covid death stats, but of course many others not included.

@snorman1776@No3spera@mpp75214@BNODesk许多新冠病毒死亡病例都不在医院,甚至包括官方新冠病毒死亡统计数据中确认的病例,但当然还有许多其他病例没有包括在内。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@cindymclennan @CDCDirector @CDCMMWR She is up to date according to CDC recommendations.
Israel data says that another booster reduces her risk of hospitalization to 1/3, probably less (due to more waning than for people in Israel getting 4th dose). As usual, CDC has no usable data of its own and has fallen behind

@cindymclennan@CDCDDirector@CDCMMWR根据CDC的建议,她是最新的。
以色列的数据显示,另一种助推器将她住院的风险降低到1/3,可能更少(因为比在以色列服用第四剂的人减少更多)。像往常一样,CDC没有自己的可用数据,已经落后了

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AinesMomForever @CDCDirector @CDCMMWR It's actually long past.

@AinesMomForever@cdcddirector@CDCMMWR实际上已经过去很久了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen Yes, there is a vocal minority of antimask and antivax, but more harm is being done by leaders and platformed "experts" who attempt to deflect responsibility for their own failure with an ineffective individualized approach the general public does not want.
Stay well as well

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen是的,反任务和反VAX的声音很小,但领导者和平台化的“专家”正在造成更大的伤害,他们试图用一种公众不希望看到的无效的个性化方法来转移自己失败的责任。
保持身体健康

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@james1chas3 @NickytaLeb It is literal not figurative.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@typbrunette @DrLeanaWen @mehdirhasan Give her a bit of slack, spinning an incoherent and immoral policy message as part of Biden's Blue Check Army is hard work. https://t.co/ke3KWsfN5G

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@james1chas3@NickytaLeb这是字面意思,不是比喻。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Typbrenette@DrLeanaWen@mehdirhasan让她放松一点,作为拜登蓝格子军的一部分,编造一个语无伦次、不道德的政策信息是一项艰巨的工作。https://t.co/ke3KWsfN5G

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen You can't NOT depend on others. Most of the determinants of safety are systemic, not individual.

@你不能不依赖别人。大多数安全性的决定因素是系统性的,而不是个体性的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen You're safe because of seat belts AND roads are designed and sometimes modified for safety AND cars designed and redesigned for safety AND drivers are licensed and chronically bad drivers unlicensed AND traffic laws are enforced (sometimes updates for safety), etc.

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen由于安全带和道路的设计,有时是为了安全而修改,为安全而设计和重新设计的汽车,司机有执照,长期不良司机无执照,交通法规得到执行(有时是为了安全而更新),等等。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen True safety comes from layered systemic measures. You're not (relatively) safe in a car because you wear a seat belt (but you should, and it makes you safer).

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen真正的安全来自分层的系统性措施。你在车里(相对)不安全,因为你系了安全带(但你应该系,这样会让你更安全)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen They do, but not to an extent that accumulated risk won't eventually get you. If you're 90% protected (very good, but likely optimistic, assumes property continuous use) then it means instead of getting infected in a month it might take 10 months.

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen他们是这样做的,但并没有达到累积风险最终无法让你受益的程度。如果你得到了90%的保护(非常好,但可能很乐观,假设财产持续使用),那么这意味着你可能需要10个月的时间,而不是在一个月内被感染。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@itosettiMD_MBA @AHS_media Tools

@itosettiMD_MBA@AHS_媒体工具

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen Acceptable when supplies are limited, although it's frankly not what I've seen recently. There are ample supply of 1870 (pink straps). Workers are trained and fit tested for them (9205 from HD fits the same as 1870). If don't pass test w/Aura, different protection given.

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen在供应有限的情况下是可以接受的,尽管坦率地说,这不是我最近看到的情况。1870条(粉色肩带)的供应充足。工人接受了培训,并接受了健康测试(HD的9205名工人与1870名工人的健康状况相同)。如果没有通过测试,则提供不同的保护。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen Also, coworkers are wearing masks, vaxed and in many cases boosted. Again, it just isn't realistic to claim this means regular folks can rely solely on a mask to stay safe in unmanaged and often unsafe environments.
Safety is systemic and layered, not individual.

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen同样,同事们戴着口罩,在很多情况下,戴着口罩。再说一次,声称这意味着普通人可以仅仅依靠口罩在不受管理且通常不安全的环境中保持安全是不现实的。
安全是系统性和层次性的,而不是个人的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RedLittleladyin @tammyischatty @DrLeanaWen ER docs are not only wearing an mask. Standards for ventilation in medical facilities are higher. Medical employers provide the masks and fit testing (or papr if needed). Patients screened and masked when they come through the door before the doc ever sees them. Not comparable.

@RedLittleladyin@tammyischatty@DrLeanaWen ER医生不仅戴着口罩。医疗设施的通风标准更高。医疗雇主提供口罩和健康测试(或papr,如果需要)。当患者在医生看到他们之前通过门时,他们会进行筛查并戴上口罩。不可比。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ZiemniakKaren @DrLeanaWen @PostOpinions Put that down on the list of things that won't happen.

@Ziemniakkare@DrLeanaWen@postOperations将其列在不会发生的事情清单上。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@No3spera @snorman1776 @mpp75214 @BNODesk No idea, but it's odd because total mortality per year in the US is well over 2 million.

@No3spera@snorman1776@mpp75214@BNODesk不知道,但这很奇怪,因为美国每年的总死亡率远远超过200万。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BeeryManilow @Craig_A_Spencer Not sure which tests you mean but at least some of the new RATs being shipped out have one year expiration dates.

@BeeryManilow@Craig_A_Spencer不确定你指的是哪种测试,但至少有些被运出的新老鼠有一年的有效期。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MattHitch @Craig_A_Spencer There is one that works, and others are in development.
But no telling what will work with a future variant (could be very different from Omicron and more like another variant), so should stockpile all of them.

@MattHitch@Craig_A_Spencer有一个有效,其他的正在开发中。
但不知道未来的变体(可能与Omicron非常不同,更像是另一个变体)会有什么效果,所以应该将它们全部储存起来。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Craig_A_Spencer The best way to prepare for future variants is to build capacity for a different and better response, especially testing (including robust surveillance), tracing, and isolation. A new variant always starts w/low cases, meaning it can be contained early.
Why repeat failures?

@Craig_A_Spencer为未来的变种做准备的最佳方法是建立不同和更好的应对能力,尤其是测试(包括强大的监控)、追踪和隔离。一个新的变体总是从低案例开始,这意味着它可以在早期得到控制。
为什么要重复失败?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AndrewMakeTweet @DrLeanaWen @j_g_allen There is no perhaps. People wants more public health measures and a more robust response, not less, full stop.
She is either lying, spinning, and/or clueless.
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

“People tire of [mandates]”
Support for Mask Mandates
July 2021: 74%
Aug 2021: 64%
Nov 2021: 72%
Jan 2022: 69% https://twitter.com/ashishkjha... https://t.co/JG98Vg79Bc

发表时间:4年前 作者:wsbgnl @wsbgnl

@AndrewMakeTweet@DrLeanaWen@j_g_allen也许没有。人们想要更多的公共卫生措施和更有力的回应,而不是更少的句号。
她要么在撒谎、旋转,要么不知所措。
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

“People tire of[mandates]”
支持面具mandates
2021:74%
2021年8月:64%
Nov 2021:72%
Jan 2022:69%https://twitter.com/ashishkjha... https://t.co/JG98Vg79Bc

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情