@mskathleenquinn @tiggerbluedevil @andyaschmidt Most places in the US don't allow smoking indoors but there are exceptions. I don't think any Starbucks allow it (not sure).

@Ms Kathleenquin@tiggerbuedevil@和Yaschmidt美国大多数地方都不允许在室内吸烟，但也有例外。我不认为任何星巴克允许（不确定）。

@mskathleenquinn @tiggerbluedevil @andyaschmidt Depending on location in the US, restaurants were restricted to take out and some (especially fast food chains) voluntarily have only offered take out from time to time. I don't think anywhere in the US ever closed restaurants entirely, but of course some close if staff are sick.

@Ms Kathleenquin@tiggerbluedevil@和Yaschmidt根据在美国的位置，餐馆被限制外卖，一些（尤其是快餐连锁店）自愿只偶尔提供外卖。我不认为美国任何地方都曾完全关闭过餐厅，但如果员工生病，当然也会关闭一些餐厅。

@mskathleenquinn @tiggerbluedevil @andyaschmidt When those making this argument start talking about "restrictions" we know it is bad faith. I very, very strongly suspect bots pushing the (sloganistic) "live with it" message, and many bots has been demonstrated numerous times, but each one will deny it of course.

@Ms Kathleenquin@tiggerbuedevil@和Yaschmidt当有人开始谈论“限制”时，我们知道这是不诚实的。我非常非常强烈地怀疑机器人推（斯洛根主义的）“与它一起生活”的信息，许多机器人已经被演示了无数次，但每个机器人都会否认这一点。

@m_scribe @wsbgnl The most common practice is neither of those things, unfortunately.

@不幸的是，最常见的做法都不是这些。

@TurkeyMedia @fitterhappierAJ original antigenic sin

“土耳其媒体”

@WesPegden @dave_andersen Okay, but probably not useful.

@WesPegden@dave_andersen好吧，但可能没用。

@mr_raiderMD @Mikka_Hog @EricTopol Thank you for explaining.

@谢谢你的解释。

@joncoopertweets Churches should be taxed like any other similar business.

@joncoopertweets教堂应该像其他类似企业一样征税。

@garugurugaru @srg1234 @EricTopol This study is actually saying nothing about how well the original booster works, it's just saying they work about the same.

@garugurugaru@srg1234@EricTopol这项研究实际上并没有说明最初的助推器工作得有多好，只是说它们的工作原理大致相同。

@mr_raiderMD @Mikka_Hog @EricTopol Have the primate results not aligned with human results in the past?

@_raiderMD@Mikka_Hog@EricTopol先生过去灵长类动物的结果与人类的结果不一致吗？

@Thissideofthep1 @EricTopol Some zero covid countries I guess. That might be useful.

@我猜这是一些零新冠病毒国家的情况。这可能有用。

@Thissideofthep1 @EricTopol Where do you find unvaccinated and uninfected people to even test?

@这一边的P1@EricTopol你在哪里找到未接种疫苗和未感染的人进行检测？

@Howitzer203 @EricTopol It does in a small number. The number is larger than experience severe disease from delta after three doses, which is concerning not so much for immediate magnitude (still small) because of the progression in the direction of immune escape.

@榴弹炮203@EricTopol它的数量很少。这一数字比三次注射后从delta感染严重疾病的人数还要多，因为免疫逃逸方向的进展，这与其说是直接的数量（仍然很小）。

@MrTheposter @EricTopol Yes it's a tweaked Moderna.

@是的，这是一个经过调整的摩德纳。

@RASmith2017 I guess the disinformation grifters are all realizing that it's hard to engage or allow engagement without being called out on your bullshit. So just retreat to one way media.

@RASmith2017我猜虚假信息的骗子们都意识到，如果不被你的胡说八道叫来，很难参与或允许参与。所以就退到单向媒体。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn @andyaschmidt It's not as clear as it could be, I agree.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquinn@和Yaschmidt我同意这并不是很清楚。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn @andyaschmidt Similarly, it wasn't known originally if vax would even keep people from dying (that was NOT measured in the trial) but you almost never heard that, likely for similar reasons.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin@和Yaschmidt类似地，最初不知道vax是否能阻止人们死亡（这在试验中没有测量），但你几乎从未听说过，可能是出于类似的原因。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn @andyaschmidt As I said earlier, it probably wasn't explained clearly, partially on purpose (to encourage uptake). I don't know whether to call that "lying" or not. Case could be made either way.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquinn@andyaschmidt正如我之前所说，它可能没有被清楚地解释，部分是有意的（为了鼓励人们理解）。我不知道该不该称之为“撒谎”。这两种情况都有可能。

@WesPegden @dave_andersen We don't know the magnitude of what would happen in the SAME situation without masks.
e.g. hypothetical
w/masks in mandate location = case rates X
w/o masks in mandate location = case rates 10X
w/o masks somewhere else, case rates = X

= no conclusion

@WesPegden@dave_andersen我们不知道在没有面具的情况下会发生什么。
e、 g.假设的
任务地点带口罩=病例率X
任务地点不带口罩=病例率10倍
其他地方没有口罩，病例率=X
=没有结论

@LazarusLong13 @projectn95 That's cool. Doesn't even LOOK like it has a valve.

@LazarusLong13@projectn95太酷了。甚至看起来都没有阀门。