@APazyryk @justthefacts85 The whole interview is here
https://twitter.com/MehdiHasan...

@APazyryk@justthefact85整个采访都在这里
https://twitter.com/MehdiHasan...

@DrLeanaWen @MagisterBracey They came back in a small minority of places, and most of the businesses that required them nationally and provided safer access to essential services even in places without local mandates, including pharmacy and grocery chains, never brought them back.
Also, what restrictions?

@DrLeanaWen@MagisterBracey他们在少数地方回来了，而在全国范围内需要他们的大多数企业，甚至在没有地方授权的地方，包括药房和杂货连锁店，也提供了更安全的基本服务，却从未让他们回来。
还有什么限制？

@DailyJLee @AlanaKinrich Certainly fast and loose with the facts, but someone claimed she doesn't do much if any patient care (I don't know if accurate) so perhaps she actually has no idea.

@DailyJLee@AlanaKinrich当然对事实毫不含糊，但有人声称她没有做太多的病人护理（我不知道是否准确），所以她可能真的不知道。

@MelpomeneMel @SheriD17536431 Calling out her bullshit = "Attacks"
Of course it is.

@MelpomeneMel@SheriD17536431大声喊她的废话=“攻击”
当然是。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn Well, it is in Washington, and most others too. I can't speak to literally all 50. We already covered that some states are so stupid they allow smoking in a restaurant, so who knows.

@tiggerbluedevil@msKathleenquin嗯，它在华盛顿，还有其他大多数地方。我不能和50个人说话。我们已经报道过，有些州愚蠢到允许在餐厅吸烟，所以谁知道呢。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn The requirement (which as you say as you say, varies by location) is to post the covid requirements (e.g. 25% capacity, max 10, masks, whatever), which are under some sort of emergency management act, which is legislation. You don't get to pick and choose which laws "count".

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin要求（正如你所说，因地点而异）是发布新冠病毒要求（例如25%容量，最多10个，口罩，等等），这些要求是根据某种紧急管理法案（即立法）发布的。你不需要选择哪些法律是“重要的”。

@tylerblack32 She, was, in fact completely wrong.
HT @JudahWorldChamp
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal....

@tylerblack32事实上，她完全错了。
HT@JudahWorldChamp
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal....

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn Many of the covid restrictions just require a different number to be written on the wall (or posted up front). Same difference.
Conditions change, what is safe under some conditions isn't safe under others.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin许多新冠病毒限制只要求在墙上写上不同的数字（或在前面张贴）。同样的区别。
条件变化，在某些条件下安全的东西在另一些条件下不安全。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn I get it, you don't like the idea of covid restrictions, but they all serve the same purpose, which is determining the number of people who can occupy a space sufficiently safely.
Response to the unexpeted (e.g. pandemics) is written into law too (usually emergency response act)

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin我明白了，你不喜欢新冠病毒限制的想法，但它们都有相同的目的，那就是确定能够充分安全地占用空间的人数。
对未失效（如流行病）的反应也写入法律（通常是《应急响应法案》）

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn Call it what you like, it all comes down to what is too much crowding for the level of safety that society deems appropriate and what isn't. That's not a set number defined by geometry, it is a matter of making tradeoffs.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin随你怎么说，这一切都归结为社会认为合适的安全水平的过度拥挤和不合适的程度。这不是几何定义的固定数字，而是一个权衡的问题。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn I'm not sure capacities are written into law, it's usually regulatory, but in any case, the important point is that it IS restricted, not anything goes, and what is a reasonable restriction depends on conditions.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin我不确定能力是否写入法律，它通常是监管性的，但在任何情况下，重要的一点是，它是受限制的，而不是任何东西，什么是合理的限制取决于条件。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn It's 100% normal to have numbers in restaurants restricted. Most places every restaurant has a maximum capacity posted. This is a normal safety restriction.
The question is what that capacity should be, which likely varies according to what safety threats there are.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin餐厅里的人数受到限制是100%正常的。大多数地方，每家餐厅都有一个最大容量张贴。这是正常的安全限制。
问题是该容量应该是多少，这可能会根据存在的安全威胁而有所不同。

@cooperlund @CriticalCricket @notdred "Up to" meaning with a recent booster, but not all that many are boosted and many of those aren't that recent.
So it really shouldn't be that high, I think other things are going on.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@cooperlund@CriticalCricket@notdred“达不到”的意思是最近的一次助推，但并不是所有的人都得到了助推，而且很多人都不是最近的。
所以它真的不应该那么高，我认为还有其他事情在发生。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@notdred Not to say that the vaccines aren't working, since they clearly are, but those charts are kind of weird.
One would really expect a lesser effect in terms of cases, but it doesn't really show up. Suggests some significant bias or confounding between vaxed and exposure.

@我不想说疫苗不起作用，因为它们显然起作用了，但这些图表有点奇怪。
从案例来看，人们真的希望效果会更小，但它并没有真正显现出来。表明VAX和暴露之间存在一些明显的偏差或混淆。

@mindstalk @Noahpinion @LenaTownend @linseymarr @jljcolorado @mattyglesias It's probably not a matter of masks vs not masks but masks plus what else.

@Mindstape@Noahpinion@LenaTownend@linseymarr@jljcolorado@mattyglesias这可能不是口罩与口罩的问题，而是口罩加上其他什么的问题。

@DrLeanaWen @nytimes A much better framing after several rounds of failed predictions of an "end" would be to consider how to respond to an "evolving" pandemic. Perhaps it evolves to an "end", which will really only be known in hindsight, or that may not happen for a long time.

@ DrLeanaWen @纽约时报一个更好的框架后，几轮失败的预测“结束”将是如何应对一个“不断演变的”大流行。也许它会发展到一个“终点”，这真的只有事后才知道，或者这可能不会发生很长一段时间。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn @andyaschmidt Yes there is a map here. Most of US has an outright ban, some places still allow bars or other exceptions, and several states in the southeast (and Wyoming) have no ban.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@是的，这里有一张地图。我们大多数人都有彻底的禁令，一些地方仍然允许酒吧或其他例外，东南部的几个州（和怀俄明州）没有禁令。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@DrLeanaWen @nytimes 1. Yes, you should try understanding the will of the people who are generally in favor of stronger public health measure than what politicians want to implement (except the costliest ones like closures).
2. "The end of the pandemic" is absurd framing. No one knows what is ahead.

@DrLeanaWen@nytimes 1。是的，你应该试着理解人们的意愿，他们通常支持比政客想要实施的更强有力的公共卫生措施（除了关闭等代价最高的措施）。
2.“大流行的结束”是荒谬的说法。没有人知道未来会发生什么。

@FarceUniversal @Thissideofthep1 @EricTopol The question was about updating the initial vaccine (for people not already vaccinated). You're right though, multiple shots could work differently even as boosters.

@FarceUniversal@ThisSideOfp1@EricTopol问题是关于更新初始疫苗（针对尚未接种疫苗的人）。你说得对，即使作为助推器，多发子弹的效果也可能不同。

@tiggerbluedevil @mskathleenquinn @andyaschmidt I said "were". As in 2020.
Was giving background since since she said she lived in Italy.

@tiggerbluedevil@mskathleenquin@andyaschmidt我说“是”。就像2020年一样。
自从她说自己住在意大利后，她就一直在提供背景资料。