Aeon 的最新消息

@sinz54 @BlakeMMurdoch Better filtration doesn't drastically increase energy costs, and may not at all (higher quality filters can have lower back-reassure even while filtering better, but cost more). Ventilation can use energy recovery, again costs more up front but little energy cost.

@sinz54@BlakeMMurdoch Better filtering不会大幅增加能源成本,而且可能根本不会(即使过滤效果更好,但质量更高的过滤器也会降低背部舒适度,但成本更高)。通风可以利用能量回收,前期成本更高,但能源成本很低。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@kprather88 With $100M all you can really do is comms.

@kprather88和1亿美元,你真正能做的就是通信。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BCChildrensHosp @beansprouts_mom @DavidWa59907969 @Fraserhealth @CAPPEM2 WTAF

@BCChildrensHosp@beansprouts_mom@davidwa5907969@Fraserhealth@CAPPEM2 WTAF

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@WalkerBragman You're right, but in practice
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@yaneerbaryam Living with the virus in any actual sense would require significant permanent adaptations. In reality, no one is suggesting that or executing on it, rather using "live with the virus" as sugar coated version of "do nothing".

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@WalkerBragman你说得对,但实际上
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@在任何实际意义上与病毒共存的亚内尔巴亚姆都需要进行重大的永久性适应。事实上,没有人建议或执行它,而是使用“与病毒共存”作为“无所事事”的糖衣版本。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Speak_Kind @itosettiMD_MBA @disclosetv According to her profile she lives in Swiss and went to school in Spain and Italy. I'm sure she knows many people in both, may have grown up in one or the other (don't know).

@根据她的个人资料,她住在瑞士,在西班牙和意大利上学。我相信她在这两个地方都认识很多人,可能在其中一个地方长大(不知道)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin @itosettiMD_MBA Hasn't it already?

@alexmeshkin@itosettiMD_MBA不是已经有了吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GalacticaZ @Gab_H_R It's actually the second or third pretend it is over phase. For Denmark it is literally the second even officially.
This happened last year: https://t.co/ZjktemaAec

@GalacticaZ@Gab_H_R实际上是第二或第三个阶段,假装已经结束。对丹麦来说,这几乎是第二次,甚至是正式的。
这发生在去年:https://t.co/ZjktemaAec

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EdmundMP @chopperface69 @lamejediron9 @neontaster Realistically it's probably both. Spotify has 400m users which dwarfs his audience, so at least a few may find him that way.

@EdmundMP@chopperface69@lamejediron9@neontaster现实地说,可能两者都有。Spotify拥有4亿用户,这让他的观众相形见绌,所以至少有几个人会这么认为。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RBReich Starbucks is a luxury good. Pick your battles better.

@RBReich星巴克是一家奢侈商品。选择更好的战斗。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@umairh That came off badly. As I said, everyone's situation is different and I was a put off by stories from downplayers who say the they've had it three times and it's no big deal. You (and your wife) are of course not that.
Please accept my apology, I'm going to delete the tweet.

@乌迈尔的表现很糟糕。正如我所说,每个人的情况都不一样,我对来自悲观者的故事感到不快,他们说他们已经经历了三次,这没什么大不了的。你(和你妻子)当然不是这样。
请接受我的道歉,我将删除这条推文。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@UK_Centrist @NoyesJHumphrey @JoeBiden Can't really do worse at this point.
At some point, it makes more sense to withhold your vote to force it to be earned with a pivot rather than choose the lesser evil which actually isn't.

@英国中间派@NoyesJHumphrey@JoeBiden在这一点上做得再糟糕不过了。
在某种程度上,更合理的做法是保留你的投票权,迫使它通过一个支点来赢得,而不是选择实际上不是的较小的邪恶。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@WHCOS "If not for inflation and covid".
Didn't even have to open the link to get the real reality check.

@WHCOS“如果不是通货膨胀和新冠肺炎”。
甚至不需要打开链接就能了解真实情况。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrLeanaWen Cases falling rapidly is a good thing!
Why rush to remove the measures where are helping them to fall? Do you want to extend the surge?
Falling 'rapidly' = don't have long to wait until cases are low.
So wait.

@Leanawen博士病例快速下降是件好事!
为什么要匆忙取消帮助他们跌倒的措施?你想延长增兵时间吗?
快速下降=不需要等待很长时间,直到病例减少。
等等。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@danjcyr @zorinaq @ianmSC Agree with that but not in terms of the sorts of case trajectories you see on graphs.

@danjcyr@zorinaq@ianmSC同意这一点,但不是从图表上看到的案例轨迹来看。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrLeanaWen @PostOpinions Ah, yes. The ploy of presenting one's own position, which is actually at the extreme in terms of current policy decisions, as the reasonable compromise.

@DrLeanaWen@postOperations啊,是的。把自己的立场作为合理的妥协,这在当前的政策决定中实际上是极端的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani Sure, there is an element of protecting vulnerable that was reasonable, AND WAS BEING DONE (of course, as with many things could be done better). This was never a *credible* alternative to other measures, since it was already being done and the other measures were still needed.

@Marco_Piani当然,保护弱势群体的一个要素是合理的,而且正在做(当然,许多事情可以做得更好)。这从来不是其他措施的“可信”替代方案,因为它已经在实施,其他措施仍然需要。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani It was never a sincere suggestion to focus protection. I get that there is a style of discourse and debate where one assumes good faith and that statements are sincere, but that's just not the case. It was all spin for "don't close (or regulate) business". The rest was fluff.

@Marco_Piani这从来不是一个专注于保护的真诚建议。我明白,有一种谈话和辩论的方式,人们假设自己是真诚的,并且陈述是真诚的,但事实并非如此。这一切都是为了“不要关闭(或监管)业务”。其余的都是绒毛。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justlikekevin @zorinaq @ianmSC Yes. "Mask mandate" doesn't affect virus. It may have an effect on mask usage (potentially w/lag) which has a downstream effect on virus. Country A may have a mask mandate and country B not, but country B may have higher mask usage. e.g. Japan, I think.

@Justlikeevin@zorinaq@ianmSC是的。“口罩指令”不会影响病毒。它可能会影响口罩的使用(可能是w/lag),从而对病毒产生下游影响。A国可能有口罩授权,B国可能没有,但B国可能有更高的口罩使用率。e、 我想是日本。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@danjcyr @zorinaq @ianmSC Not sure that matters. 10% reduction in household-to-household transmission means 10% reduction in in-house transmission too (in absolute numbers, which is what is being measured and graphed).

@danjcyr@zorinaq@ianmSC不确定这是否重要。家庭间传播减少10%也意味着内部传播减少10%(以绝对数字计算,这是正在测量和绘制的数字)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DailyJLee @wsbgnl @clhvelo Three days later, Singapore closed schools (which had previously been open during most of the pandemic) warning that the delta variant affected children more severely.

@DailyJLee@wsbgnl@clhvelo三天后,新加坡关闭了学校(此前在大流行期间大部分时间都是开放的),警告说,德尔塔变种对儿童的影响更严重。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情