@DrLeanaWen @wolfblitzer @CNNSitRoom How does "availability" of vaccines matter to a kid whose parents are skeptical or antivax, or for that matter antimask too?
Throw them to the wolves because a focus group said so? Is that how this works?

@DrLeanaWen@wolfblitzer@CNNSitRoom疫苗的“可用性”对一个父母持怀疑或抗VAX态度的孩子有什么影响，或者对这个问题也有什么影响？
因为焦点小组这么说就把它们扔给狼？这就是工作原理吗？

@2Mombie @luckytran The data is focus group data
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@2Mombie@luckytran数据是焦点小组数据
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@luckytran It's political, and was orchestrated with a leading wave of white house-affiliated "experts" selling the pivot since some time in January. No one is looking at those numbers.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@幸运的是，它是政治性的，自1月的某个时候以来，它与一批与白宫有关联的“专家”一起策划了这一潮流。没有人在看这些数字。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@sicilianslice12 @DrLeanaWen Reported here. HT @luckytran
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@西西里岛12@DrLeanaWen报道。HT@luckytran
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@luckytran Shocker: https://t.co/qXISxY512y

“幸运的冲击：https://t.co/qXISxY512y

@RadCentrism @kprather88 I'd count that as comms, or perhaps outreach, organizing community efforts, etc. Similar categories.

@RadCentrism@kprather88我将其视为通信，或者外联，组织社区活动等类似类别。

@hjelle_brian Probably a matter of low severity. Wasn't there data showing lower protection against reinfection with lower severity with previous variants too?

@hjelle_brian可能是个不太严重的问题。难道没有数据表明，以前的变种对再感染的保护程度较低，严重程度也较低吗？

@hillcountryrai1 @DrLeanaWen There is a good bit of that.

@hillcountryrai1@DrLeanaWen有一个很好的例子。

@hillcountryrai1 @DrLeanaWen ''You have to be willing to think “cases may be coming down n spite of measures” or “measures may have made things worse”''
I'm willing but evidence doesn't show that in most cases. Contrarian theories are okay to examine, but usually just wrong.

@hillcountryrai1@DrLeanaWen“你必须愿意思考“尽管采取了措施，案件可能会减少”或“措施可能让事情变得更糟”
我愿意，但大多数情况下，证据并不能证明这一点。相反的理论可以检验，但通常是错误的。

@hillcountryrai1 @DrLeanaWen Cloth masks probably help a little (few percent not overstating it) but in practice when masks are needed, lots of people wear masks better than cloth masks even though cloth masks are the minimum standard.

@hillcountryrai1@DrLeanaWen布面口罩可能有一点帮助（百分之几不夸张），但在实践中，当需要口罩时，许多人戴口罩比布面口罩更好，尽管布面口罩是最低标准。

@sicilianslice12 @DrLeanaWen Deaths are a lagging indicator. Wearing or not wearing masks won't change deaths happening among people who were infected weeks ago.

@西西里岛12@DrLeanaWen死亡人数是一个滞后指标。戴或不戴口罩不会改变数周前感染者的死亡情况。

@DrTomFrieden You better hope it doesn't emerge in a western country since most lack the capacity for effective measures and haven't shown any intent to build it.

@Tomfrieden博士你最好希望它不会出现在西方国家，因为大多数国家缺乏采取有效措施的能力，也没有表现出任何建设它的意图。

@hjelle_brian Is it less lethal than WT?

@hjelle_brian它的致命性比WT低吗？

@spectatorindex This story is hours old.

@这个故事已经有好几个小时了。

@ryu_pl @WalkerBragman To repopulate of course.

@当然，ryu_pl@WalkerBragman需要重新填充。

@Terminal_GForce @duty2warn @TomJChicago It's more than 25% of THEIR voters.

@Terminal_GForce@duty2warn@TomJChicago超过25%的选民支持他们。

@69L46 @Capt3958 @JeromeAdamsMD Some difference between 80% when rising and when falling.

@69L46@Capt3958@JeromeAdamsMD上升和下降时80%之间的差异。

@IanRicksecker @JeromeAdamsMD @Capt3958 It has to be some combination of R and case levels. At very low case levels (if you don't fully eradicate), you can have transitory high R but measures that are sufficient contain cases and bring R back down. Not the same measures needed as high R + high cases.

@IanRicksecker@JeromeAdamsMD@Capt3958必须是R和病例水平的某种组合。在非常低的病例水平（如果你没有完全根除），你可以有短暂的高R，但足够的措施可以控制病例，并使R下降。与高R+高病例所需的措施不同。

@heartmamaof4 @justthefacts85 It's actually not dark at all. Just open your eyes.

@heartmamaof4@justthefact85其实一点也不暗。睁开眼睛。

@sinz54 @BlakeMMurdoch Agree. Different question though.

@sinz54@BlakeMMurdoch同意。但问题不同。