Aeon 的最新消息

@robinzharley @ASlavitt 200k isn't a small number. That's around 8% increase in total mortality. YEARS of reduced life expectancy. Nothing like that has been seen in modern times. More so if you're right about higher numbers.

@robinzharley@ASlavitt 200k不是一个小数字。这意味着总死亡率增加了8%左右。预期寿命缩短的年份。这种情况在现代还没有出现过。如果你对更高数字的看法是正确的,那就更重要了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DantzlerLowe @kchoudhu As does Nicolas van Saberhagen
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@kchoudhu Remember, Satoshi Nakamoto contains the letters N, S, and A.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@DantzlerLowe@kchoudhu以及Nicolas van Saberhagen
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@记住,Satoshi Nakamoto包含字母N、S和A。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@kchoudhu Remember, Satoshi Nakamoto contains the letters N, S, and A.

@记住,Satoshi Nakamoto包含字母N、S和A。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@HFentonMudd @ChristosArgyrop @LazarusLong13 Still not sure how Fauci got to five.

@Hventonmudd@ChristosArgyrop@LazarusLong13仍然不确定Fauci是如何做到五点的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@HFentonMudd @ChristosArgyrop @LazarusLong13 Remdesivir. It's authorized for outpatient early treatment now, but inconvenient (three infusions).

@Hventonmudd@ChristosArgyrop@LazarusLong13 Remdesivir。它现在被授权进行门诊早期治疗,但不方便(三次输液)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ChristosArgyrop @LazarusLong13 I'm not sure how he got five (I count four), but I guess whatever it was it is one fewer now.
Fauci: https://t.co/iItykSBIUh

@ChristosArgyrop@LazarusLong13我不确定他是怎么得到五个(我数了四个),但我想不管是什么,现在都少了一个。
福西:https://t.co/iItykSBIUh

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@opentodialogue @EricTopol UK counts deaths differently. Deaths within 28 days of a positive test are counted. In US, cause of death is assigned on a death certificate, usually by a medical practitioner. Obviously this isn't precise but it generally aligns with excess deaths, in fact the latter is higher.

@opentodialogue@EricTopol UK统计的死亡人数有所不同。检测呈阳性后28天内的死亡人数被计算在内。在美国,死因通常由医生在死亡证明上注明。显然这并不精确,但它通常与过度死亡相一致,事实上后者更高。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@opentodialogue @EricTopol It's called the practice of medicine.

@opentodialogue@EricTopol它被称为医学实践。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EricTopol @SixandLaura In fact, many CAN be numb to it.

@EricTopol@SixandLaura事实上,很多人对此已经麻木了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@_PARENT_TEACHER @MarkLevineNYC @GovKathyHochul Exactly. NYC is very different from the rest of the state. Everything is more crowded and many people have fewer or no options to avoid high exposure. Should have its own mandate.

@_家长和老师@marklevineyc@GovKathyHochul完全一样。纽约与该州的其他地方大不相同。一切都更加拥挤,许多人几乎没有或没有避免高暴露的选择。应该有自己的授权。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@617to416 @krupali Team blue thinks caving to team red will make team red like them more instead of just flipping to a different flavor of outrage, which is what will actually happen.

@617to416@krupali Team blue认为,屈服于红色团队会让红色团队更像他们,而不仅仅是转向另一种愤怒,这才是真正会发生的事情。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wanderer_jasnah @kjoules 72% w/o booster is kind of apocalyptic. 1/3 of unvaxed severe rate (esp death) is still really high.

@流浪者jasnah@kjoules 72%不带推进器有点像世界末日。1/3的无负担严重率(特别是死亡率)仍然很高。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DailyJLee @MarkLevineNYC It was mostly restaurants where people are going to take off masks anyway.

@DailyJLee@marklevineyc大多数餐馆的人们都会摘下口罩。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 @zhang_yueting I think a lot of seat belts would stay on (not all) but that's only due to generational timescale of the mandate being in place. A year or two after seat belt mandates, no.

@LazarusLong13@zhang_yueting我认为很多安全带都会系上(不是全部),但这只是因为代际授权的时间尺度。在安全带授权后一两年,不会。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FelsLeftyTakes @Amber_mom_ @Freeyourmindkid Even more so when it is convenient to what the boss actually wants, if you know what I mean.

@如果你明白我的意思的话,FelsLeftyTakes@Amber_mom_@Freeyourmindkid在老板真正想要的东西方便的时候会更自由。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Bob_Wachter Lower risk of catching virus, but not really "far lower".

@Bob_Wachter降低了感染病毒的风险,但并不是真的“低得多”。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ChaseClark2260 @wsbgnl At least 20,000 were probably vaccinated, although US has terrible data collection so nobody really knows.

@ChaseClark2260@wsbgnl至少有20000人可能接种了疫苗,尽管美国的数据收集非常糟糕,所以没有人真正知道。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@pdubdev The number actually terminated (assuming this even happens) will be far less than 4000 because most will just get vaxed when the mandate is actually enforced, as happened with every other mandate. Some may get exemptions too.

@pdubdev实际终止的数量(假设这种情况发生)将远远少于4000,因为大多数人在实际执行任务时会感到困惑,就像其他所有任务一样。有些人也可能获得豁免。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@VanGennepD When polled back in 2021, largely before this aspect of 'offramping' was politicized, epidemiologists mostly said another year or more, even as widespread vaccination was expected in a few months. Since then, immune escape variants in the wild have increased, so...

@ VanGennepD在2021调查时,主要是在“OfFrAMP”这一方面被政治化之前,流行病学家大多说了一年或更长时间,甚至在几个月内预计会有广泛的疫苗接种。从那时起,野生环境中的免疫逃逸变种增加了,所以。。。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@whstancil It's literally exactly the same decision making, albeit under somewhat different conditions. Making a call to downplay in February motivated by an election in November.

@尽管在不同的条件下,这实际上是完全相同的决策。由于11月的选举,在2月呼吁淡化。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情