@thereal_truther @TheEliKlein I'm going to guess Eli won't be contributing to lengthening your commute any time soon.

@thereal_truther@TheEliKlein我猜Eli不会很快延长你的通勤时间。

@KirinDave @bascule Agree!
Historically it doesn't tend to last long. In both Bitcoin and Monero, miners will often move hash rate off a dominant pool, thus the vulnerability is short-lived. The previous >50% Monero pool is now 38%.
Better that it doesn't happen at all, I agree.

@KirinDave@bascule同意！
从历史上看，它不会持续很长时间。在比特币和Monero中，矿商通常会将散列率从占主导地位的池中移出，因此这种漏洞是短暂的。上一个>；50%的Monero pool现在是38%。
我同意，最好不要发生这种事。

@EricTopol Don't have the tools to provide early effective treatment at these case levels. Not enough supply.

@EricTopol没有在这些病例水平上提供早期有效治疗的工具。供应不足。

@weskerfoot @RealSexyCyborg Not trivial to use correctly. You can just easily cross contaminate yourself or something else you touch again after you take the gloves off (phone, keys, etc.)
Also, there have been shortages, may be again.

@weskerfoot@RealSexyCyborg正确使用并非微不足道。脱下手套（手机、钥匙等）后，你很容易交叉污染自己或你再次接触的其他东西
此外，还出现了短缺，可能再次出现。

@RealSexyCyborg Why does China (and a few other places) continue to spray disinfectant everywhere, including outside?

@RealSexyCyborg为什么中国（和其他一些地方）继续在各地喷洒消毒剂，包括室外？

@mooonchild85 @XBrit4Med @l_farland @TheAngryEpi The trend is pretty clear in fact. https://t.co/FHhDCCe4Vq

@MoonChild85@XBrit4Med@l_farland@TheAngryEpi事实上，这种趋势非常明显。https://t.co/FHhDCCe4Vq

@AdamMantine @AbraarKaran Portraying it as one extreme or the other is both unhelpful, and false.
With due respect to your personal experience. Hope you are doing better.

@AdamMantine@AbraarKaran将其描述为一个极端或另一个极端既没有帮助，也不真实。
尊重你的个人经历。希望你做得更好。

@ColinDotNet @goldnecklace2 @choo_ek A lot of them are not normal anything, they're troll armies. Hard to tell how many if any are delusional and sincere, but it doesn't really matter.

@ColinDotNet@goldnecklace2@choo_ek他们中的很多人都不正常，他们是巨魔军队。很难说有多少人是妄想和真诚的，但这并不重要。

@bascule @KirinDave It's not that simple. There is more than naked trust since pool dominance is fleeting. A pool that produced dishonest blocks would likely lose customers. This is both a self-correcting mechanism as well as an economic motive to not exploit.

@bascule@KirinDave没那么简单。由于游泳池的主导地位转瞬即逝，人们不仅仅是赤裸裸的信任。产生不诚实区块的池可能会失去客户。这既是一种自我纠正机制，也是一种不利用的经济动机。

@KirinDave @bascule Fungibility is better for usability in a circular economy. It's better for usability all around, but with a few dominant exchanges that can decide or be coerced not to accept it at all, that's another problem, potentially worse.

@KirinDave@bascule可替代性在循环经济中的可用性更好。这对所有方面的可用性都有好处，但由于少数主要的交换可以决定或被迫完全不接受它，这是另一个问题，可能更糟。

@KirinDave @bascule That's a reasonable position, which is why I said unclear and arguably. I don't think it's definitive either way.

@KirinDave@bascule这是一个合理的立场，这就是为什么我说的不清楚且有争议。我认为这两种方式都不确定。

@unmaskourfuture @ColinDotNet @jennnloveslove @choo_ek Whether you admit it or not, the guy who made it is better off with less direct exposure to unmasked restaurant customers and less community transmission. Kids and their families are too.

@unmaskourfuture@ColinDotNet@jennloveslove@choo_ek不管你承认与否，通过减少与未经掩盖的餐厅顾客的直接接触和减少社区传播，成功的人会过得更好。孩子们和他们的家人也是。

@KirinDave @bascule An "attack" at least arguably implies some sort of actual harm, like double spending or destabilizing the chain. In both Monero and Bitcoin and most other cases where a pool has had 50%+ this doesn't happen, the chain just continues normally.

@KirinDave@bascule至少可以说，一次“攻击”意味着某种实际伤害，比如双重支出或破坏链条稳定。在Monero和比特币以及大多数其他情况下，如果一个池有50%以上的收益，那么这种情况不会发生，链只是正常地继续。

@bascule @KirinDave Just conceptually it is pretty unclear whether a pool that is commercially successful is actually a "51% attack".
Creates conditions that are more vulnerable to one, sure, but that's not the same thing.

@bascule@KirinDave仅仅从概念上来说，一个商业上成功的泳池是否真的是“51%的攻击”还很不清楚。
当然，这会造成更容易受到攻击的情况，但这不是一回事。

@bascule @KirinDave Shrug, that happened to Bitcoin eight years ago, if not earlier. Clearly was fatal /s.

@bascule@KirinDave耸耸肩，八年前比特币就是这样，如果不是更早的话。显然是致命的。

@KirinDave @bascule I don't understand that question

@KirinDave@bascule我不明白这个问题

@goldnecklace2 @ColinDotNet @choo_ek It's a service job like anything else. Something like half the economy or is people doing service jobs for other people, pandemic or no pandemic.
Good luck with the revolution.

@goldnecklace2@ColinDotNet@choo_ek这是一项服务工作，与其他任何工作一样。大概是经济的一半，或者人们正在为其他人做服务工作，不管是大流行还是没有大流行。
祝革命好运。

@bascule @KirinDave I've yet to see evidence that exchanges care if you there is a quarter of a penny of suspicious funds mixed in there somewhere. Maybe they do, but it's not clear. As I understand it, they generate a risk score, and small amounts may not score meaningfully.

@bascule@KirinDave我还没有看到证据表明交易所关心你是否有四分之一便士的可疑资金混入其中。也许是的，但还不清楚。据我所知，它们会产生一个风险评分，而少量可能不会有意义地评分。

@KirinDave @bascule Assuming the user is knowledgable, no. You lock the suspicious receive and it never gets mixed up with anything legitimate.
If the troublemaker is willing to send meaningful amounts then it becomes less obvious, but that's also less likely to happen for obvious reasons.

@KirinDave@bascule假设用户是知情的，不。你锁定可疑的接收，它永远不会与任何合法的东西混淆。
如果麻烦制造者愿意发送有意义的金额，那么它就会变得不那么明显，但出于明显的原因，这种情况也不太可能发生。

@KirinDave @bascule Those are good points.
Monero (of which AEON is a small offshoot) suggests that it solves the problem, but then some exchanges refuse to accept it at all. Still, from a usability perspective if you're able to create a circular economy, this may be better.

@KirinDave @bascule 这些都是好点。
Monero（AEON 是其中的一个小分支）表示它可以解决问题，但随后一些交易所根本拒绝接受它。不过，从可用性的角度来看，如果您能够创建循环经济，这可能会更好。