@PoliticsOnMyMnd @caramelcoat8dme She's working for the white house to "shape public opinion". It's never disclosed on the TV, which itself is unethical.
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/mtF77UVgTG

@PoliticsOnMyMnd@caramelcoat8dme她为白宫工作是为了“塑造公众舆论”。它从未在电视上公开，这本身就是不道德的。
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/mtF77UVgTG

@KawasakiKR11 @planetnat @NickytaLeb Blood donors is a terrible sample.

@川崎KR11@planetnat@NickytaLeb献血者是一个可怕的样本。

@DrLeanaWen @Mike_S_Leonard The circumstances are that a majority of people in EVERY SINGLE STATE, a large majority in many, want to keep mask mandates.
Whose interests are being prioritized over that majority and why?
https://twitter.com/bhrenton/s...

@DrLeanaWen@Mike_S_Leonard情况是，每个州的大多数人，许多州的绝大多数人，都希望保留口罩授权。
谁的利益优先于大多数人？为什么？
https://twitter.com/bhrenton/s...

@KaleEmulsions @JuliaRaifman That data is 14 months old. Posting it now without even including a date on it is misinformation.

@Kaleemulons@JuliaRaifman表示数据已经有14个月了。现在发布，甚至连日期都没有，这是错误的信息。

@dcgirl49987458 @bhrenton @NEJM Hospitalization OR death was treated as the endpoint. No deaths occurred, but hospitalizations did. This could be random, with only 2000 patients.

@以dcgirl49987458@bhrenton@NEJM住院或死亡作为终点。没有发生死亡事件，但住院情况确实如此。这可能是随机的，只有2000名患者。

@ChristosArgyrop Think of the mink.

@想想水貂。

@Noahpinion @bending_michael It's not price, but it's still cost.

@Noahpinion@bending_michael这不是价格，但仍然是成本。

@Zoso771 @ZTexas3 @fitterhappierAJ @Pravduh15 You can always sell your soul to get it.

@Zoso771@ZTexas3@fitterhappierAJ@Pravduh15你可以卖掉你的灵魂来获得它。

@jrzygirlinfla @wsbgnl https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jrzygirlinfla@wsbgnlhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl This smells an awful lot like the next episode of "Mission Accomplished". Nature responds to that in a consistent way. Watch and see.

@wsbgnl这闻起来很像《使命完成》的下一集。大自然以一致的方式对此做出回应。看看吧。

@ArtKorenevsky @kstrna62 @tylerblack32 The problem with the US is that some ares maintained more restrictions during most of 2020 (or lifted them only briefly during the summer), even as others didn't. OWID stringency index is a terrible way to measure this.

@ArtKorenevsky@kstrna62@tylerblack32美国的问题是，一些战区在2020年的大部分时间里保持了更多的限制（或者只是在夏季短暂取消了限制），而其他战区则没有。OWID严格性指数是衡量这一点的糟糕方法。

@ArtKorenevsky @kstrna62 @tylerblack32 "If policies vary at the subnational level, the index shows the response level of the strictest
subregion."
This is useless for a large subdivided country like the US. You need to weigh by population or something.

@ArtKorenevsky@kstrna62@tylerblack32“如果政策在国家以下各级有所不同，该指数将显示最严格国家的响应水平
次区域。"
对于像美国这样的大国来说，这是没有用的。你需要按人口或其他什么来衡量。

@Slut_Dragula @phelprya @chrislhayes Chris is claiming the 'entire Senate caucus' agreed to it. 🤷

@Slut_Dragula@phelprya@chrislhayes Chris声称“整个参议院核心小组”都同意了。🤷

@mikejohansenmd @MarkELindsay Population-level protection against death is declining significantly in practice, both due to waning being faster than continued uptake and variant evasion.

@mikejohansenmd@MarkELindsay人群的死亡防护水平在实践中显著下降，这是因为其下降速度快于持续吸收和变异逃避。

@mikejohansenmd @MarkELindsay Yeah, well I have three doses. Many don't. Until there is some way to successful sell that (and then resell it when it wanes), it's not really working at the population level. But I certainly recommend it!

@mikejohansenmd@MarkELindsay是的，我有三剂。很多人不会。除非有办法成功销售（然后在价格下降时转售），否则它在人口水平上并没有真正起作用。但我当然推荐它！

@mikejohansenmd @MarkELindsay Word like "massive" are vague. See numbers in next tweet.

@mikejohansenmd@MarkELindsay像“massible”这样的词很模糊。请参阅下一条推文中的数字。

@mikejohansenmd @MarkELindsay Observe large increase in percentage of vaccinated deaths in January. This is not population data so base rate applies, but percentage vaccinated didn't change much (boosters probably increased a little)
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@mikejohansenmd@MarkELindsay观察到1月份接种疫苗死亡的百分比大幅上升。这不是人口数据，所以基本比率适用，但接种率变化不大（助推器可能增加了一点）
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@mikejohansenmd @MarkELindsay For delta during that time period (but probably not after waning) because there was a large effect of blocking infection (essentially 100% w/booster). No infection -> no severe outcome.
For Omicron, no.

@mikejohansenmd@MarkELindsay在这段时间内（但可能不是在减弱后）为delta提供治疗，因为有很大的阻断感染的效果（基本上100%w/增强剂）。无感染->；没有严重后果。
对于Omicron，没有。

@baekdal https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

Ｔibakelahttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@SueSueCurious @CovidCanada1 @trendless @Mrhockey1231 @Amal4Solutions Try 3M Aura or VFlex.

@SuesueGuirous@CovidCanada1@trendless@Mrhockey1231@Amal4Solutions尝试3M Aura或VFlex。