@mysteriouskat It's bonkers guidance that treats 70-90% of the population as a "high risk" subgroup needing exceptional measures.
Any sane general guidance would be based on the vulnerability reality of the bulk of the population, not a narrow minority of exceptionally low risk.

@神秘行动指南将70-90%的人口视为需要特殊措施的“高危”人群。
任何明智的总体指导都将基于大部分人口的脆弱性现实，而不是极低风险的少数群体。

@mysteriouskat Source https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@神秘之源https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@mysteriouskat FWIW, "increased risk for C-19" according to CDC, is at least 70% of the population (overweight and obese), potentially close to 90% after adding in other risk factors.

@CDC称，“C-19风险增加”至少占总人口的70%（超重和肥胖），加上其他风险因素后可能接近90%。

@Lujan588 @trilnack @JudahWorldChamp @CDCDirector Saw this gambit coming long ago
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Lujan588@trilnack@JudahWorldChamp@CDC总监早就预见到了这一幕
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@AJDelgado13 I'm sure those paratroopers on their way to bring cupcakes as a goodwill gesture for the children of Kiev.

@AJDelgado13我相信那些伞兵会带上纸杯蛋糕，作为对基辅孩子们的友好姿态。

@ryan_landay That space station thing is just odd.

@ryan_landay太空站的事很奇怪。

@ZiemniakKaren @TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder Thats when the current order expires.

@ZiemniakKaren@TheAngryEpi@MyraBatcheld当前订单到期时。

@BoobyJargon @itosettiMD_MBA @vet_dot @megtirrell There was nothing outdated about them. They were based on modeling of delta, which was the dominant circulating variant.
People didn't like the resulting recommendation to mask, but that doesn't make the recommendation epidemiologically wrong. Much world was still masking.

@BoobyJargon@itosettiMD_MBA@vet_dot@megtirrell他们一点也不过时。它们基于delta的建模，delta是主要的循环变量。
人们不喜欢由此产生的戴口罩的建议，但这并不意味着这个建议在流行病学上是错误的。世界上仍有许多地方被掩盖着。

@ChrisWillcoxSTL @jfeldman_epi Like I said, not much but not nothing.

@正如我所说，ChrisWillcoxSTL@jfeldman_epi不多，但也不是什么都没有。

@drlucymcbride @JReinerMD It makes sense to do both.

@drlucymcbride@jrinermd两者都做是有意义的。

@ChrisWillcoxSTL @jfeldman_epi Also 3 masks supposed to last forever. Likewise tests.

@ChrisWillcoxSTL@jfeldman_epi还有3个口罩，应该可以永远戴下去。类似的测试。

@ChrisWillcoxSTL @jfeldman_epi CDC has done nothing helpful for a long time if ever, but some local actions have been (a little) better.

@ChrisWillcoxSTL@jfeldman_epi CDC长期以来没有做任何有益的事情，但一些地方行动（稍微）有所改善。

@BoobyJargon @itosettiMD_MBA @vet_dot @megtirrell If this is supposed to be sustainable guidance, then basing it specifically on Omicron rather than the range of what has been seen (at least current known VoC), or even somewhat wider is foolish. Future variant may be different.

@BoobyJargon@itosettiMD_MBA@vet_dot@megtirrell如果这是一个可持续的指导，那么将其具体基于Omicron，而不是已经看到的范围（至少是目前已知的VoC），甚至是更大的范围是愚蠢的。未来的变种可能会有所不同。

@ChrisWillcoxSTL @jfeldman_epi You got a few mask mandates in places that were very reluctant to implement them despite applicable CDC general masking guidance since July, e.g. NY.
Not much, but not nothing.

@ChrisWillcoxSTL@jfeldman_epi你在一些地方得到了口罩授权，这些地方非常不愿意实施口罩，尽管自7月以来，美国疾病控制与预防中心（CDC）已经发布了适用的一般口罩指导，例如纽约。
不多，但不是一无所有。

@nohomelikeplace If you're a hospital, this CDC guidance is for you.
For everyone else, ignore CDC.

@如果你是一家医院，这个CDC指南是为你准备的。
对其他人来说，忽略CDC。

@BoobyJargon @itosettiMD_MBA @vet_dot @megtirrell "High transmission" is the level at which general masking is recommended, so this is never recommended until after hospitals start to fill.

@BoobyJargon@itosettiMD_MBA@vet_dot@megtirell“高传播率”是建议使用一般遮盖的水平，因此在医院开始填充之前，永远不建议使用这种方法。

@BoobyJargon @itosettiMD_MBA @vet_dot @megtirrell Yes and no. Only triggered at >28/100k reported cases day which is a very high threshold (with no accounting for testing or positivity) and it is impossible to reach "high transmission" until hospitals start to fill no matter how fast or how cases rise.

@BoobyJargon@itosettiMD_MBA@vet_dot@Megtirell是和否。仅在>；每天报告的病例数为28/10万，这是一个非常高的阈值（不考虑检测或阳性），在医院开始填补之前，无论病例增长有多快或多高，都不可能达到“高传播”。

@itosettiMD_MBA @megtirrell It's on this page
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@itosettiMD_MBA@Megtirell在这一页上
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@fitterhappierAJ @IAmDoingTweets May have been stuck

@fitterhappierAJ@IAmDoingTweets可能被卡住了

@dianaberrent @MrYuksSeaShanty @DrEricDing @CDCgov @CDCDirector 3% positivity if testing is uniform or random = 1 kid in each class positive on average, and was probably positive the day before testing too.

@dianaberrent@MrYuksSeaShanty@drericing@CDCgov@cdcedirector如果测试是均匀或随机的，则阳性率为3%=平均每班1个孩子呈阳性，并且可能在测试前一天也呈阳性。