Aeon 的最新消息

@ChrisNokeoi721 @Alexmenter @VincentRK Shoes, clothes, hats, sunscreen, hand washing, inspection of food facilities, safety inspections, regulations for cars and other products, etc. None of these are "normal human behavior", we created and adopted them to manage risks.

@ChrisNokeoi721@Alexmenter@VincentRK鞋、衣服、帽子、防晒霜、洗手、食品设施检查、安全检查、汽车和其他产品法规等。这些都不是“正常的人类行为”,我们创建并采用它们来管理风险。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Alexmenter @VincentRK Effective leadership means guiding toward reasonable precautions given reality, not no precautions and not excessive ones. For many people, risk associated with indoor restaurants is significant and avoiding them may be reasonable. Others may choose to roll the dice.

@Alexmenter@VincentRK有效领导意味着在现实情况下采取合理的预防措施,而不是没有预防措施,也不是过度预防措施。对许多人来说,与室内餐厅相关的风险是巨大的,避免它们可能是合理的。其他人可能会选择掷骰子。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ChrisNokeoi721 @Alexmenter @VincentRK What you're calling "restrictions" is just normal human behavior and and function of society. Why do we have rules, customary practice, regulations about food safety, hygiene, etc.? Because there are pathogens in the environment that we mitigate. New pathogen -> adjust behavior.

@ChrisNokeoi721@Alexmenter@VincentRK你所说的“限制”只是正常的人类行为和社会功能。为什么我们有关于食品安全、卫生等方面的规则、习惯做法、法规。?因为我们可以缓解环境中的病原体。新病原体->;调整行为。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Alexmenter @VincentRK None of that is true. Well the part about deaths following hospitalization and cases is true.
If your life has not had joy or meaning in the past two years, you're doing it wrong. Can and must both do both.

@Alexmenter@VincentRK这些都不是真的。关于住院后死亡和病例的部分是正确的。
如果你的生活在过去两年里没有乐趣或意义,那你就错了。两者都可以而且必须兼而有之。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Alexmenter @VincentRK A rational "offramp" to pre-pandemic baseline behavior is morbidity and mortality at pre-pandemic baseline levels. That's not even true for healthy vaccinated people at this point, much less those more vulnerable.

@Alexmenter@VincentRK大流行前基线行为的合理“出口”是大流行前基线水平的发病率和死亡率。在这一点上,健康接种疫苗的人甚至都不是这样,更不用说那些更脆弱的人了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AbraarKaran @denise_dewald The phrase is fine. Unfortunately as used, the word "learning" is just used as decoration.

@AbraarKaran@denise_dewald这个短语很好。不幸的是,“学习”这个词只是用来装饰。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BernieDogs4 Plenty of people want to do it. https://www.dallasnews.com/bus... https://t.co/mpftxPhSWS

@很多人都想这么做。https://www.dallasnews.com/bus...对不起,对不起。https://t.co/mpftxPhSWS

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@phealthsean This is why
https://twitter.com/robinzharl...

@AeonCoin @WhiteHouse Fair point but if you are CNN wouldn’t you pay a lot of money to have someone on your show who has access to the White House?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Robin @robinzharley

这是为什么
https://twitter.com/robinzharl...

@AeonCoin@WhiteHouse Fair point但如果你是CNN,你会不会花很多钱让你的节目中有人可以进入白宫?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@robinzharley @WhiteHouse They're probably paid by the media outlets where they are consulted and portrayed as "experts", and that has issues too.

@robinzharley@WhiteHouse他们可能由媒体支付报酬,在那里他们被咨询并被描绘成“专家”,这也有问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@robinzharley @WhiteHouse Article doesn't say paid. But definitely access.

@robinzharley@WhiteHouse的文章没有说付费。但绝对可以进入。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michellezenner @ai6yrham Might have been talking about the store at the gas station.

@Michelezenner@ai6yrham可能在谈论加油站的商店。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@berman_allen @ai6yrham May 2021 didn't have verification. It might have worked better (at least for a while) if it did.
But this is fighting the last war. A vaccine exemption to a transmission-reducing mitigation when vaccine doesn't stop transmission = dumb.

2021年5月的贝尔曼纳艾伦@艾哈伊姆没有得到证实。如果真是这样的话,它可能会运行得更好(至少在一段时间内)。
但这是在打最后一场战争。当疫苗不能阻止传播时,疫苗对减少传播缓解的豁免=哑巴。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DataDrivenMD It's the same group of mouthpieces who started the influence campaign to sell it to the public a month or so go.

@DataDrivenMD正是这群喉舌发起了影响力运动,在一个月左右的时间里向公众出售它。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LynyrdoV @alexmeshkin It requires some legwork, need to find brokers/exchange at each end. And not necessarily convenient. But when the choice is death, worth the effort.

@LynyrdoV@alexmeshkin需要一些腿部工作,需要在每一端找到经纪人/交易所。而且不一定方便。但当选择死亡时,值得付出努力。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LynyrdoV @alexmeshkin Send her bitcoin.

@LynyrdoV@alexmeshkin向她发送比特币。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@juli_bg_bs @alexmeshkin Nobody knows what = nukes. It's easy to make veiled and ambiguous threats and not so easy to actually push the button.
But the risk is there, yes.

@没有人知道什么是核武器。很容易做出含蓄和含糊不清的威胁,但实际按下按钮却不那么容易。
但风险是存在的,是的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@myrabatchelder @CDCgov "Social" contact with vulnerable person = mask
Work, school, community, etc. contact with vulnerable person = don't mask
🤔

@MyraBatcheld@CDCgov与弱势群体的“社交”接触=口罩
工作、学校、社区等与弱势群体接触=不要戴口罩
🤔

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AndiLou12 @BethPathak @nytimes @CNN Not curious, the reason is documented. They're coordinated by the white house to shape public opinion.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@PoliticsOnMyMnd @caramelcoat8dme She's working for the white house to "shape public opinion". It's never disclosed on the TV, which itself is unethical.
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/mtF77UVgTG

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@AndiLou12@BethPathak@nytimes@CNN不奇怪,原因有记录在案。他们由白宫协调,以塑造公众舆论。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@PoliticsOnMyMnd@caramelcoat8dme她为白宫工作是为了“塑造公众舆论”。它从未在电视上公开,这本身就是不道德的。
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/mtF77UVgTG

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@nohomelikeplace According to CDC criteria, "healthy Americans" is something like 10-30%. 70% is overweight or obese, and the list of high risk conditions goes far beyond that.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@根据CDC的标准,“健康的美国人”大约占10-30%。70%的人超重或肥胖,而高风险的情况远远不止这些。
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情