@JeromeAdamsMD There are examples of this in replies (and you replied to them) but they are a tiny fraction of the influence that CDC has.
To this day people (maybe MOST) poorly informed about risk because of poor CDC info on deep cleaning, plexiglass, 6ft/15m, etc.
First, give good info.

@JeromeAdamsMD在回复中有这样的例子（你也回复了），但它们只是CDC影响力的一小部分。
直到今天，人们（可能是大多数人）对风险知之甚少，因为CDC在深度清洁、有机玻璃、6英尺/15米等方面的信息很差。
首先，提供好的信息。

@JeromeAdamsMD That's not reality. People do follow it. Not all people and not 100% compliance but it's also far from zero.
Also, as with anyone, CDC can't be 'forced' to do something that it can't do. All it is accomplishing by trying is credibility self-immolation.

@杰罗米亚达姆这不是现实。人们确实在关注它。不是所有人，也不是100%遵守，但也远远不是零。
此外，和其他人一样，CDC不能被“强迫”去做它做不到的事情。通过尝试所取得的一切都是自焚。

@zanfr @MatTitoLandry @MeetJess PrEP doesn't really make sense for this virus where everyone can be exposed at any time. PEP might.

@zanfr@MatTitoLandry@MeetJess PrEP对这种病毒来说毫无意义，因为每个人都可以随时接触到这种病毒。佩普可能会。

@Mikeska @JeromeAdamsMD (Exception to 1 is the mask order for transportation, and a few other things, but mostly not)

@Mikeska@JeromeAdamsMD（1的例外是运输的口罩订单和其他一些东西，但大部分不是）

@Mikeska @JeromeAdamsMD 1. CDC just advises and informs, it doesn't make decisions on optional vs. non-optional. Should give sound health and epidemiological advice and others sort out the politics.
2. "Endgame" = unknown because the future is. Offramp:
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Mikeska@JeromeAdamsMD 1。CDC只是提供建议和通知，它不会对可选和非可选做出决定。应该提供健康和流行病学方面的建议，其他人则应该解决政治问题。
2.“结局”=未知，因为未来是未知的。出口：
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JeromeAdamsMD Municipalities aren't the only consumers of CDC guidance. But, more fundamentally, CDC is poorly equipped and not empowered to lead a coordinated response and shouldn't try. It should be giving accurate information about how to prevent and control disease.

@JeromeAdamsMD市政当局并不是CDC指南的唯一消费者。但是，更根本的是，疾控中心装备不良，没有领导协调应对的权力，不应该尝试。它应该提供关于如何预防和控制疾病的准确信息。

@TheSkylineTrail @wsbgnl I'm not saying it's obvious what to do, I'm saying it is obvious that leaders got together and decided to do less to nothing.
That was even explicitly reported, when Biden met with governors a month or so ago.

@TheSkylineTrail@wsbgnl我不是说很明显该做什么，我是说很明显，领导们聚在一起，决定少做一些，什么都不做。
大约一个月前拜登会见州长时，这一点甚至被明确报道。

@xabitron1 @EnemyInAState @DonEford That one could easily go either way. i.e. Not recommending for political reasons even if needed to stop disaster

@xabitron1@EnemyInAState@DonEford，你可以很容易地选择任何一种方式。i、 e.出于政治原因，即使需要阻止灾难，也不推荐

@wsbgnl That is quite obvious from reading the news.

@wsbgnl从新闻中可以明显看出这一点。

@astweetedbyRP @dodgeguy_360 @KyivIndependent There may be some foreign pilots willing to fly as well, in Ukrainian uniform.

@astweetedbyRP@dodgeguy_360@KyivIndependent可能也有一些外国飞行员愿意穿着乌克兰制服飞行。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew There is most definitely improvement needed, all around.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew这是最需要改进的地方。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew Also possible to give graduated advice i.e. this is best, but if you're not going to do that, do this instead, or this, or this.
First, be honest about what keeps people healthy and safe. Then consider offering second best alternatives.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew也可以给出分级建议，也就是说，这是最好的，但如果你不打算这样做，就改为这样做，或者这个，或者这个。
首先，诚实地说出是什么让人们保持健康和安全。然后考虑提供第二好的替代品。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew Should be giving the best sensible health and epidemiological advice and encouraging people to follow, but if they don't they don't. It's the only way to retain credibility, lest every statement later will be second guessed as political or underhanded.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew应该提供最明智的健康和流行病学建议，并鼓励人们遵循，但如果他们不这样做，他们就不这样做。这是保持可信度的唯一途径，以免以后的每一个声明都会被事后猜测为政治或卑鄙。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew The problem FOR THE FUTURE, is that the CDC giving nonsensical guidance for political/maniputative purposes only undermines its own credibility later. See "don't wear masks", etc.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew未来的问题是，疾控中心为政治/假设目的提供无意义的指导，只会损害其自身的信誉。参见“不要戴口罩”等。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew Schools, a few more, but even a few of those were rejected in court, or not enforced. Tradition of local control of schools is strong.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew学校，还有一些学校，但即使是其中的一些学校也在法庭上被驳回，或没有得到执行。当地控制学校的传统很强。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew Very few prohibited businesses from anything and the majority of those were prohibiting vaccine mandates, which was never a CDC recommendation anyway. Future, who knows.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew几乎没有禁止任何业务，其中大多数是禁止疫苗授权，这从来都不是疾控中心的建议。未来，谁知道呢。

@Loretta_Torrago @SixandLaura @LolaMotz @boggleknits @BernieDogs4 @nohomelikeplace @wsbgnl I don't know about the whole theory but #4 is certainly plausible. May have been less transmissible and/or less severe, resulting in only small, low-impact and often self-limiting outbreaks that wouldn't necessarily be noticed.

@Loretta_Torrago@SixandLaura@LolaMotz@boggleknits@BernieDogs4@nohomelikeplace@wsbgnl我不知道整个理论，但#4确实是合理的。可能传播性较低和/或严重程度较低，只会导致小规模、低影响且通常自我限制的暴发，不一定会被注意到。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew Now we're well into ideal (unified response) vs. actual. Ideal would be great but is rarely achievable in any setting.
Also, not top concern doesn't mean not a concern. It's easy to try to approach it as extremes but usually not that. Vast majority still express some concern.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew现在我们已经进入了理想（统一响应）与实际的对比。理想很好，但在任何环境下都很难实现。
此外，不是最高关注点并不意味着不是关注点。很容易将其视为极端，但通常并非如此。绝大多数人仍然表达了一些担忧。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew Many companies that operate in GOP states as well as federal facilites follow (at least partially) CDC guidance.

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew许多在共和党州以及联邦机构运营的公司都遵循（至少部分）CDC的指导。

@NancyK07312478 @JeromeAdamsMD @drsajumathew It's not just masks. The tier levels and other recommendations matter too. Some companies change policy based on whether CDC defines risk in an area as "high".

@NancyK07312478@JeromeAdamsMD@drsajumathew不仅仅是面具。层级和其他建议也很重要。一些公司会根据CDC是否将某个地区的风险定义为“高”而改变政策。