@StephanieR0721 @LazarusLong13 Just? That started two years ago.

@StephanieR0721@LazarusLong13刚刚？这始于两年前。

@Miss_Mausie @oni_blackstock https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

@Mausie小姐@oni_blackstockhttps://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

@jfeldman_epi https://t.co/zGopvtVvzA

@jfeldman_epihttps://t.co/zGopvtVvzA

@usual_suspect89 @JeromeAdamsMD @scheib_gary Waning immunity may or may not (seems debated) but mutations/variants that evade immunity certainly have. Vaccines (esp 2 doses) are much less effective against serious disease w/Omicron than previous variants.

@通常的怀疑89@JeromeAdamsMD@scheib_gary免疫力减弱可能会也可能不会（似乎有争议），但逃避免疫力的突变/变体肯定会有。与之前的变种相比，疫苗（esp 2剂）对含奥米克隆的严重疾病的效果要差得多。

@Lex_K_Ho @lldiedrich None of the CDC metrics or identified risk factors consider long covid at all.

《疾控中心度量标准》或被识别的危险因素中的任何一个都不考虑长期的贪婪。

@myrabatchelder @ashishkjha @TheLancet Even if vaccinated (though, as you say, most are not) they will still infect vulnerable parents, other family members, and caregivers, adding to that 5 million number.

@MyraBatcheld@ashishkjha@thelance即使接种了疫苗（尽管，正如你所说，大多数人没有接种），他们仍然会感染易受感染的父母、其他家庭成员和看护者，使这500万人增加。

@Bruinsfan523 @illuminatithot1 @InfoSecAlerts1 @marcorubio Nothing good
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... https://t.co/CbwNCmqKLY

@Bruinsfan523@illightathot1@InfoSecAlerts1@marcorubio没什么好的
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/CbwNCmqKLY

@YouAreLobbyLud @meganranney @AndrewMakeTweet @benwakana46 @CDCgov You could both be right, especially on "better than it could have been". Doesn't take much imagination to come up with a plausible worse.

@YouAreLobbyLud@meganraney@andrewmakeetweet@benwakana46@CDCgov你们可能都是对的，尤其是在“比本来更好”这一点上。不需要太多的想象力就能想出一个合理的更糟的方案。

@APazyryk @itosettiMD_MBA Israel PM

@APAzyryk@itosettiMD_MBA以色列总理

@MarvinH2_G2 @murchiston @itosettiMD_MBA @Gab_H_R You can be uncomfortable with pervasive civilian gun ownership but not feel the same way about mandatory military service. Gun knowledge from the latter doesn't bother me at all.

@MarvinH2_G2@murchiston@itosettiMD_MBA@Gab_H_R你可能会对无处不在的平民枪支所有权感到不舒服，但对强制服兵役的感觉却不同。后者的枪械知识一点也不困扰我。

@Filmnoir11 @l985 Um, talk about being down this road, you're literally responding to a thread that a dozen or so tweets ago described a rational and sensible offramp. Here you go again:
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Filmnoir11@l985嗯，说到这条路，你实际上是在回应一条帖子，十几条推特之前描述了一条理性而明智的出口。又来了：
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Filmnoir11 @l985 @ChrisNokeoi721 CDC recommendations are not mask mandates. These are different questions entirely.

@Filmnoir11@l985@ChrisNokeoi721 CDC的建议不是强制要求。这些是完全不同的问题。

@WillBrockman2 @COVIDnewsfast 📅🎯

@WillBrockman2@COVIDnewsfast📅🎯

@Alexmenter @ChrisNokeoi721 @VincentRK Change is a constant, yes, but unless levels of morbidity and mortality are completely at pre-pandemic levels (they're not), it's not rational for behavior to be completely there either.

@Alexmenter@ChrisNokeoi721@VincentRK的变化是恒定的，是的，但除非发病率和死亡率完全处于大流行前的水平（它们不是），否则行为完全处于大流行前的水平也是不合理的。

@jhall251 @Alexmenter @VincentRK If you are a rabid anti-masker yes. Even seeing other people wearing a mask or deciding not to go to restaurants is absolutely life-destroying.

@jhall251@Alexmenter@VincentRK如果你是一个狂躁的反面具者是的。即使看到其他人戴着口罩或决定不去餐馆，也绝对是对生命的毁灭。

@Nutmeg031992 @BernieDogs4 It was an indicator of what people want more than a prediction of whether they will quit.
Many are quitting to change jobs now anyway though (mostly for pay/advancement), so factoring in remote/hybrid options becomes fairly easy.

@肉豆蔻031992@BernieDogs4这是人们想要什么的指标，而不是他们是否会辞职的预测。
不过，现在很多人都辞职换工作了（主要是为了工资/晋升），所以考虑远程/混合选项变得相当容易。

@COVIDnewsfast Ukraine, yes, but also note the specific timing of the announcement. Not a schedule you pick if wanting scrutiny.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@科维德新闻快报乌克兰，是的，但也要注意公告的具体时间。如果你需要仔细检查，就不要选择时间表。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Alexmenter @ChrisNokeoi721 @VincentRK Again, if conditions of morbidity and mortality were similar to baseline, then 2019 behavior would be reasonable. But they are not and it is not.
Deploy more antivirals, better vaccines, environmental controls (ventilation, etc.) and we may get there. Not there now.

@Alexmenter@ChrisNokeoi721@VincentRK再次强调，如果发病率和死亡率与基线相似，那么2019年的行为是合理的。但事实并非如此。
部署更多的抗病毒药物、更好的疫苗、环境控制（通风等），我们可能会达到目的。现在不在那里。

@Alexmenter @ChrisNokeoi721 @VincentRK Rates of cases, illness, death, and long covid, aren't low, antivirals aren't readily available (supply is a tiny fraction of what is needed), and available vaccines are the least effective they have ever been (well if that weren't true rates would be lower)

@Alexmenter@ChrisNokeoi721@VincentRK病例、疾病、死亡和长期新冠肺炎的发病率并不低，抗病毒药物也不容易获得（供应量只是所需量的一小部分），现有疫苗的效力是有史以来最低的（如果这不是真的，发病率会更低）

@ChrisNokeoi721 @Alexmenter @VincentRK Virtually everything about the world you live in is the result of people adjusting to the conditions of the world. When the conditions in the world change, you change with it. Pretending otherwise isn't a healthy or helpful solution.

@ChrisNokeoi721@Alexmenter@VincentRK几乎你生活的世界的一切都是人们适应世界条件的结果。当世界上的条件改变时，你也随之改变。假装不是一个健康或有益的解决方案。