@sri_srikrishna 1. No idea. Maybe not significant.
2. Resistance varies by manufacturer, yes, but 4x is always going to be less resistance than 1x
Still, I suspect the filter cost, accounting for replacement, is going to be about the same regardless of the number of filters used.

@sri_srikrishna 1。不知道。也许不重要。
2.电阻因制造商而异，是的，但4x的电阻总是小于1x
尽管如此，我怀疑过滤器的成本，考虑到更换，无论使用多少个过滤器，都将大致相同。

@sri_srikrishna @TySopko I haven't measured but I suspect that four filters will last approximately four times longer than one (one can reason why this is likely), so effectively the same cost. Plus less wear and tear on the fan.

@sri_srikrishna@TySopko我还没有测量过，但我怀疑四个过滤器的使用时间大约是一个过滤器的四倍（可以解释为什么可能会这样），所以实际上成本是相同的。此外，风扇的磨损也更少。

@MichelleBehlen @AlexandraHo19 @beahaven @WikiDocJames Long covid isn't vax injuries. People had it in 2020 before vaxes.

@MichelleBehlen@AlexandraHo19@beahaven@Wikidoc詹姆斯·朗·科维奇不是vax损伤。人们在2020年vaxes之前就有了它。

@berman_allen @MelpomeneMel @SuitsTracey @TySopko 2 million boardings per day in 2019. So roughly 2 per person per year. If typical flight is 2.5 hours that would be about right.
It's skewed because some never travel, some travel very often.

@2019年，berman_allen@MelpomeneMel@SuitsTracey@TySopko每天有200万次食宿。大约每人每年2个。如果典型的飞行时间是2.5小时，那就差不多了。
它是倾斜的，因为有些人从不旅行，有些人经常旅行。

@oltmannd @luckytran Has to be both. If there weren't transmission happening in those other places (work, school, etc.) no one would bring it home.

@oltmannd@luckytran必须两者兼而有之。如果在其他地方（工作、学校等）没有传播，没有人会把它带回家。

@sigurdbordvik @chud_meridian @TheWisestHuman @NateSilver538 An immunity evading virus doesn't need to be that contagious to spread. It could be even less contagious than the original virus, if it entirely evades existing immunity. It would take months to spread around the world (as first did), potentially longer with good mitigations.

@sigurdbordvik@chud_meridian@TheWisestHuman@NateSilver538一种逃避免疫的病毒不需要具有传染性就能传播。如果它完全逃避现有的免疫力，它的传染性甚至可能比原始病毒更低。这将需要数月的时间在全世界传播（就像第一次那样），如果有良好的缓解措施，可能会持续更长的时间。

@sri_srikrishna @TySopko Four filters are going to last longer than one. I don't think you can make the comparison purely based on immediate efficiency.

@sri_srikrishna@TySopko四个过滤器的使用寿命将超过一个。我不认为你可以纯粹基于即时效率来进行比较。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Dark blue is wastewater (aggregate from many sampling locations), light blue is official reports. There's only a small divergence, actually less than in the past.
https://biobot.io/data/ https://t.co/8bLluH7X0e

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY深蓝色是废水（来自许多采样点的骨料），浅蓝色是官方报告。只有很小的差异，实际上比过去小。
https://biobot.io/data/ https://t.co/8bLluH7X0e

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY If escape from immunity to severe disease happens, it'll likely be an accident i.e. numbers game.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY如果发生严重疾病免疫逃逸，很可能是一场意外，即数字游戏。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY It's not really clear that is true at this point because vaccination suppresses spread so little (at least after a few months, and most of the US is well past that). Not much to be gained by escaping immunity that doesn't stop spread.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY目前还不清楚这一点是否正确，因为疫苗对传播的抑制作用非常小（至少在几个月后，我们大多数人已经远远超过了这一点）。逃避无法阻止传播的免疫力并没有什么好处。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY You can deduce roughly that cases have increased moderately relative to official count, but not a whole lot.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY您可以大致推断，与官方统计相比，病例有所增加，但并不是很多。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Deaths are low because of vaccination.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY由于接种疫苗，死亡率较低。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Daily cases right now in VN is 42k, which is more than the US (38k). Not more per capita, but more overall. There are probably differences in testing and counting but still, that's NOT controlling infection.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY目前在越南的每日病例数为42k，高于美国（38k）。不是人均水平更高，而是总体水平更高。检测和计数可能存在差异，但仍然无法控制感染。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Your point makes no sense. Even if we go with the 6.2 million number, the vast majority of these are outside the US. The idea that the US is more likely to export than import variants is wrong.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY你的观点毫无意义。即使我们按照620万的数字计算，其中绝大多数都在美国之外。认为美国出口的可能性大于进口的想法是错误的。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Yes, it controlled infection before vaccination, which is excellent. But not since. So infection spread and variants can form, there as with anywhere else.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY是的，它在接种疫苗之前控制了感染，这非常好。但从那以后就没有了。因此，与其他任何地方一样，感染在那里传播并形成变种。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0... https://t.co/gzPpMMuuEK

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNYhttps://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/gzPpMMuuEK

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Yes, and NOW Vietnam has 42k deaths, not a small number at all. Considering that most of the infections happened after vaccination (meaning much lower fatality rate), this represents a very large number of infections, even if not all officially counted.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY是的，现在越南有4.2万人死亡，一点也不小。考虑到大多数感染发生在接种疫苗后（意味着死亡率要低得多），这代表了一个非常大的感染数量，即使不是所有感染都被官方统计在内。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY That's only the official count. The true count is MUCH larger. WHO says 15 million dead. That's not 15 million dead out of 505 million (would be totally inconsistent with known fatality rate). It is 15 million dead out of billions.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY这只是官方统计。真正的数字要大得多。他说1500万人死亡。这并不是5.05亿人中有1500万人死亡（这与已知的死亡率完全不一致）。数十亿人中有1500万人死亡。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Outside of China and a few other small places. NO ONE HAS EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED spread. The majority of the world has been infected.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY中国境外和其他一些小地方。没有人能有效控制传播。世界上的大多数地区都受到了感染。

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY Where variants come from doesn't depend on political borders. It's all about spread of infection i.e. large majority outside the US (by population; if the US had more to infect, it would).

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY变异的来源并不取决于政治边界。这一切都是关于感染的传播，即大多数在美国以外（按人口；如果美国有更多的感染，它会）。