@denise_dewald That's not his only broken promise. Pretty much every promise made to those all along the left side of the political spectrum (i.e. his supporters) was abandoned. It's no surprise that his biggest loss of support is those under 40 (again, his biggest supporters).
@denise_dewald这不是他唯一一次背信弃义。几乎所有对左翼政治派别（即他的支持者）做出的承诺都被放弃了。毫不奇怪，他失去支持最多的是40岁以下的人（同样是他最大的支持者）。
@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter Seems fine if there is no mandate and you don't care about others (not just the people on the plane, but people farther down the chain of transmission you may be contributing to).
@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter如果没有授权，你也不关心其他人（不仅是飞机上的人，还有你可能参与的传播链下游的人），那就好了。
@SallyBourliakas @dany0sanl @Bob_Wachter Kids can not wear an N95. They don't exist. They can wear a variety of unregulated but allegedly effective masks often of dubious quality, effectiveness, or authenticity. Kids under 2 are not recommended to mask at all.
@Sallybouriakas@dany0sanl@Bob_Wachter儿童不能穿N95。它们不存在。他们可以戴各种不受监管但据称有效的口罩，通常质量、效果或真实性都不可靠。不建议2岁以下的孩子戴口罩。
@Bob_Wachter @sri_srikrishna Yes, but not a substitute for universal masking when you sometimes must remove the mask for hydration, food, or medicine. More vulnerable people, in particular, may have less or no ability to go for extended periods without doing so, but its an issue that affects almost everyone.
@Bob_Wachter@sri_srikrishna是的，但当你有时需要去除面膜以补充水分、食物或药物时，它并不能替代通用面膜。尤其是更易受伤害的人，如果不这样做的话，他们可能没有或没有能力长时间外出，但这是一个几乎影响到所有人的问题。
@LorraineHirsch @kastin83 @JoustingJim @BallouxFrancois @paulkrugman If it fits properly you shouldn't need that. But the situation is very problematic, with free N95s being distributed with no regard to fit and no consistent availability of specific models (if someone knows what fits).
@LorraineHirsch@kastin83@JoustingJim@BallouxFrancois@paulkrugman如果它合适的话，你不需要它。但这种情况是非常有问题的，免费的N95在分发时不考虑合身性，也没有特定型号的一致可用性（如果有人知道什么适合）。
@sigurdbordvik @chud_meridian @TheWisestHuman @NateSilver538 "Normalcy" is what we make, and part of that is an adaptive policy response to changing conditoins. If conditions are different, and they are, the policy should be different, too. That's perfectly normal.
Covering your eyes and ears and pretending to be in 2019 is NOT NORMALCY.
@sigurdbordvik@chud_meridian@TheWisestHuman@NateSilver538“常态”是我们所做的，其中一部分是对不断变化的情况的适应性政策反应。如果条件不同，政策也应该不同。这很正常。
遮住眼睛和耳朵，假装在2019年是不正常的。
@sigurdbordvik @chud_meridian @TheWisestHuman @NateSilver538 Heath services at risk of collapse isn't the only thing that to a longer term strategy. We have all matter of public safety, health, and hygiene regulations and restrictions that we don't lift just because doing so would not cause health systems to collapse.
@sigurdbordvik@chud_meridian@the Wisest Human@NateSilver538面临崩溃风险的医疗服务并不是唯一一个需要长期战略支持的项目。我们有所有关于公共安全、健康和卫生的法规和限制，我们不会因为这样做不会导致卫生系统崩溃而取消这些法规和限制。
@sigurdbordvik @chud_meridian @TheWisestHuman @NateSilver538 "End game" meaning what?
Conditions haven't returned to 2019, why should policy?
Strategy, sure. Not politicians' strong suit generally.
@sigurdbordvik@chud_meridian@TheWisestHuman@natesilve538“游戏结束”意味着什么？
条件还没有回到2019年，政策为什么要这么做？
策略，当然。一般来说，这不是政客的强项。
@lsaldanamd @Bob_Wachter There is little reason to wait. Boosters are good for six months, maybe, and this won't be produced and distributed faster than that. If it is produced at all. This is a beta-derived booster. The omicron-derived one still being tested may do better.
@lsaldanamd@Bob_Wachter几乎没有理由等待。助推器的有效期可能是六个月，而且它的生产和分发速度不会比这更快。如果它是生产出来的。这是一种衍生于beta的助推器。目前仍在测试的omicron衍生产品可能会做得更好。
@chud_meridian @sigurdbordvik @TheWisestHuman @NateSilver538 In part, that's okay. Everything we do in terms of hygiene was once an "intervention".
But it's also faulty logic. This is happening right now. The current magnitude of health burden and current rate of variant generation is not obviously perpetual, and most probably isn't.
@在某种程度上，这没关系。我们在卫生方面所做的一切都曾是“干预”。
但这也是错误的逻辑。这正在发生。目前的健康负担和变异世代的比例显然不是永久性的，而且很可能不是永久性的。
@sri_srikrishna @TySopko It works that way in HVAC systems usually. I haven't see dirty CR box filters yet, so I can't be sure, but my guess is pressure drop across the filter (especially if dirty) is much larger than open air.
@sri_srikrishna@TySopko通常在暖通空调系统中是这样工作的。我还没有看到脏的CR箱过滤器，所以我不能确定，但我猜过滤器的压降（尤其是脏的情况下）比露天大得多。
@chud_meridian @sigurdbordvik @TheWisestHuman @NateSilver538 It's happening all the time to some extent. For example, right now there are some new sub variants largely limited to upstate New York that appear potentially significant. They're not well understood. Slowing down how fast they end up everywhere is very sensible.
@在某种程度上，它一直在发生。例如，目前有一些新的子变种，主要局限于纽约州北部，似乎具有潜在的重要意义。他们没有被很好地理解。放慢它们在任何地方结束的速度是非常明智的。
@hopeful_hoosier @Griffith17431 @xrelaht @AbraarKaran @ZerlinaMaxwell You're right. I believe they updated that chart since I saw it. Now it's only considered non-equivalent in the other direction (going from 9210 to 9205). Interesting.
@希望你是对的。我相信自从我看到那张图表后，他们更新了它。现在，它只在另一个方向被认为是不等效的（从9210到9205）。有趣的
@Griffith17431 @xrelaht @AbraarKaran @ZerlinaMaxwell 3m lists authorized resellers on their web site, but the 9210 only appears to be available by the case.
Also, they're considered by 3M to have different fit (there is an equivalence chart and these are NOT equivalent). If one fits you really well, don't switch to the other one.
@Griffith17431@xrelaht@AbraarKaran@ZerlinaMaxwell 3m在其网站上列出了授权经销商，但9210似乎只在案例中可用。
此外，3M认为它们具有不同的拟合度（有一个等效图，但它们并不等效）。如果其中一个非常适合你，不要换另一个。
@sri_srikrishna Space is different tradeoff, agree.
If by efficiency you mean more total units, then you need to account for the cost of more fans. Total cost (including filter replacement) would then be higher.
@斯里克利希纳空间是不同的权衡，同意吗。
如果效率指的是更多的总单元，那么你需要考虑更多风扇的成本。总成本（包括过滤器更换）将更高。
@mgordonaz @JeromeAdamsMD You would have no way to know about superspreader events involving air travel, since there is no effective contact tracing in the US. Other countries have documented them.
https://paxex.aero/researchers...
@mgordonaz@JeromeAdamsMD由于美国没有有效的联系人追踪，你将无法了解涉及航空旅行的超级传播者事件。其他国家也有记录。
https://paxex.aero/researchers...