@ocnj3 @juliaioffe Can't eat the correspondents' dinner with one on.

@ocnj3@juliaioffe不能在记者的晚餐上开着一个。

@LazarusLong13 @drsiyabmd Is that one of the meds that can be stopped for a few days, or just a disqualified?

@LazarusLong13@drsiyabmd是一种可以停几天的药物，还是一种不合格的药物？

@LazarusLong13 @Infoseepage @IHME_UW @AtomsksSanakan Finally, CDCs measure of seropresence (via blood draws) is dubious. They can't be bothered to try to collect a random sample.

@LazarusLong13@info渗流@IHME_UW@AtomsksSanakan最后，CDC对血清存在的测量（通过抽血）是可疑的。他们不必费心去收集随机样本。

@LazarusLong13 @Infoseepage @IHME_UW @AtomsksSanakan Also, with immunity escape and reinfection this isn't measuring the right thing at all.

@LazarusLong13@info渗流@IHME_UW@AtomsksSanakan同样，在免疫逃逸和再感染方面，这根本不是正确的衡量标准。

@Infoseepage @LazarusLong13 @IHME_UW Also confirmed cases in December were much lower than 26 million.

@Info渗流@LazarusLong13@IHME_UW去年12月的确诊病例也远低于2600万例。

@Infoseepage @LazarusLong13 @IHME_UW It's certainly worse now. In December there was still free testing without insurance coverage and many more public test sites which are now gone.

@现在肯定更糟了。去年12月，仍然有没有保险覆盖的免费测试，还有更多的公共测试点现在已经消失。

@LazarusLong13 @IHME_UW I don't find it implausible. During previous surges ascertainment was never great (maybe 1 in 10 to 1 in 5). It is surely worse now for well-known reasons.

@LazarusLong13@IHME_-UW我并不觉得这难以置信。在之前的激增中，确定性从来都不是很好（可能是十分之一到五分之一）。由于众所周知的原因，现在情况肯定更糟。

@DrLeanaWen There's nothing 'normal' about frequent boosters, virus circulating year-round, widespread viral testing (home or lab), needing to scramble to find treatment within a few days, etc.
It is a new normal at best, not the pre-pandemic normal. That's gone, probably forever.

@Leanawen博士：频繁使用助推器、病毒全年传播、广泛的病毒检测（家庭或实验室）、需要在几天内匆忙寻找治疗等都不是“正常”的。
这充其量只是一种新常态，而不是大流行前的常态。那已经过去了，可能永远都不会了。

@madalynkathrynm @JeromeAdamsMD Around 400k, though that's a significant undercount.

@madalynkathrynm@JeromeAdamsMD大约40万，尽管这是一个显著的低估。

@JeromeAdamsMD "Most under the current administration" is becoming less meaningful with time. After all they've been dealing with the pandemic significantly longer. Let's say Biden hypothetically stays in office 8 years. Will it make sense in 2028 to be comparing 8 years of deaths vs 9 months?

@JeromeAdamsMD“现任政府中的大多数”随着时间的推移变得越来越没有意义。毕竟，他们应对疫情的时间要长得多。假设拜登在白宫任职8年。在2028年比较8年和9个月的死亡率有意义吗？

@DavidM_yeg @BobHump28451784 @LucaFerrettiEvo Zero life expectancy makes no sense. You would have to be dead. The dude making ridiculous arguments about "statistics" should think this through, if able.

@DavidM_yeg@BobHump28451784@LucaFerrettiEvo零预期寿命毫无意义。你肯定死了。如果可能的话，那些对“统计数据”进行荒谬争论的家伙应该好好想想。

@Noahpinion All you need is a pen.

@你只需要一支笔。

@loisrp @sfchronicle Especially true when uninsured have to pay for their own tests

@loisrp@sfchronicle尤其适用于未投保者必须自行支付检测费用的情况

@danaludwig @mliffmann @MIJudy @DrEricDing @whca @maxwelltani What you quoted said that people were contagious before testing positive, but if they're still contagious after testing positive then requiring a negative test would REDUCE risk (i.e. filter out some contagious people). Maybe by not a lot, though.

@danaludwig@mliffmann@MIJudy@drericing@whca@maxwelltani你引用的话说，检测呈阳性之前，人们是有传染性的，但如果检测呈阳性之后，他们仍然有传染性，那么要求进行阴性检测将降低风险（即过滤掉一些有传染性的人）。不过可能不会太多。

@DavidLKeating @LazarusLong13 Impressive sounding big number but that's like 30 cfm per occupant which is not all that different from many indoor spaces.

@Davidlketing@LazarusLong13听上去是一个令人印象深刻的大数字，但这相当于每个居住者30立方英尺（cfm），与许多室内空间没有太大区别。

@phealthsean @wsbgnl There are almost certainly messy and contended policy debates at the local level, such as in Philadelphia, where clarity from CDC would carry significant influence. This isn't about flipping DeSantis.

@phealthsean@wsbgnl几乎可以肯定，在地方层面上，存在着混乱且相互竞争的政策辩论，比如在费城，CDC的明确性将产生重大影响。这不是要把德桑蒂斯翻过来。

@r3nz___ @AdvanceSapiens @Dennis_Porter_ Not with a big enough gap down. But most likely this loan is recourse and the borrower has other assets, so you're ultimately right.

@r3nz___;@AdvanceSapiens@Dennis_Porter_;差距不够大。但很可能这笔贷款是有追索权的，借款人还有其他资产，所以你最终是对的。

@phealthsean @wsbgnl There is no recommendation here that local authorities enact mandates. The court decision and appeal is over CDCs authority to impose a legally binding mandate of its own. But surely it can legally recommend operator mandates, right?

@phealthsean@wsbgnl这里没有建议地方当局制定授权。法院的判决和上诉是针对疾控中心强制执行其自身具有法律约束力的任务的权力。但它肯定可以合法地推荐运营商授权，对吗？

@FinchTH I don't want to look for a quote but the "last wave" predictions go back before delta. I think fall 2020 was supposed to be the "one more wave".

@FinchTH我不想找一句话，但“最后一波”的预测要追溯到delta之前。我认为2020年秋季应该是“又一次浪潮”。

@DailyJLee @BillHanage Definitely poorly phrased.

@DailyJLee@BillHanage的措辞肯定很糟糕。